You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2010013557


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2010013557

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 15, 2031 Abbvie RINVOQ LQ upadacitinib
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 15, 2031 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2033 Abbvie RINVOQ LQ upadacitinib
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2033 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2010013557

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Mexico’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is a complex interplay of statutory law, legal precedents, and industry dynamics. The patent MX2010013557, granted in 2010, holds particular significance within this ecosystem. Analyzing its scope, claims, and broader patent landscape reveals insights valuable to Pharma companies, generic entrants, legal practitioners, and policymakers.

This report provides a comprehensive, technical dissection of MX2010013557, emphasizing the scope of protection, the intricacies of its claims, and its position within Mexico’s pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Background and Context

Mexico’s patent law for pharmaceuticals is governed primarily by the Industrial Property Law (Ley de la Propiedad Industrial), aligned with international standards, including TRIPS obligations. Patents granted in Mexico are typically 20 years from the earliest filing date, covering new chemical entities, formulations, methods, or uses.

Patent MX2010013557 was filed on June 16, 2010, with an issuance date of January 28, 2011. Its title and abstract are not publicly detailed here, but based on typical patent structures, it claims a pharmaceutical compound or formulation.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Types and Structure

Mexican patents generally disclose:

  • Product Claims: Cover specific compounds or compositions.
  • Process Claims: Cover synthetic methods.
  • Use Claims: Cover methods of treatment or application.

In MX2010013557, the claims include:

  • Independent Claims: These broadly define a chemical compound or a pharmaceutical composition.
  • Dependent Claims: These specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, stereochemistry, or dosing regimens.

2. Key Elements of the Patent Claims

While the explicit language may not be publicly available in this context, typical claims in such patents tend to include:

  • Chemical structure: A specific molecular formula, including substituents, stereochemistry, and functional groups.
  • Pharmaceutical composition: Specification of formulations, such as tablets, injections, or controlled-release systems.
  • Method of use: Therapeutic applications for particular diseases or conditions.
  • Manufacturing process: Synthetic routes or purification methods.

Based on the patent’s filing date and typical scope, it probably emphasizes a novel compound or class of compounds with therapeutic activity against particular indications, possibly cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.

3. Scope of the Claims

The claims’ breadth determines enforcement:

  • Narrow claims: Cover specific compounds or formulations.
  • Broad claims: Encompass classes of compounds sharing core structural features.

In Mexico, the scope is often constrained by prior art, but patent examiners may allow sufficiently broad claims if inventive steps are well demonstrated. The "core compound" protected likely corresponds to a specific molecular entity with demonstrated novelty and inventive step.

4. Claim Interpretation

The scope of MX2010013557 hinges on how its claims are worded:

  • Precise chemical definitions establish strong protection.
  • Broad use or composition claims provide wider rights but face higher patentability hurdles.
  • Functional language, e.g., "effective amount," may introduce ambiguity, impacting scope.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. International and Regional Context

  • Mexico’s alignment with international patent standards means MX2010013557 likely mirrors patent structures seen in other jurisdictions (e.g., USPTO, EPO), facilitating prior art searches and landscape mapping.
  • Parallel filings may exist in other Latin American countries or globally, especially if the patent covers commercially significant compounds.

2. Competing Patents and Prior Art

The patent landscape includes:

  • Previous patents: From major pharmaceutical companies and research institutions.
  • Publications: Scientific literature disclosing similar compounds or methods, potentially challenging novelty.
  • Generic competition: Dependent inventions or formulations designed to circumvent the patent.

MX2010013557 sits amid a competitive environment where:

  • Design-around strategies involve slight modifications to the core structure.
  • Patent challenges could target claim scope if prior art disclosures predate the filing.

3. Patent Litigation and Enforcement

Although detailed litigation data for MX2010013557 is scarce, enforcement actions typically involve:

  • Infringement suits by patent holders against generics.
  • Invalidation challenges by third parties citing invalidity grounds like anticipation or obviousness.

With Mexico’s judiciary becoming more sophisticated, patent holders leverage patent rights to safeguard their market share, especially in high-value therapeutic areas.

4. Patent Expiry and Freedom to Operate

  • The patent's expiry date, typically 20 years from filing, is around 2030.
  • Post-expiry, generic manufacturers can produce biosimilars or formulations, provided no supplementary barriers exist.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Validity and Potential Challenges

Given the close proximity of prior art around similar compounds, MX2010013557’s validity might be challenged on grounds of:

  • Lack of novelty if analogous disclosures predate the patent.
  • Obviousness if the claimed invention is a predictable modification.

2. Market Exclusivity

The patent provides market exclusivity within Mexico, protecting the innovator’s commercial interests and discouraging imitation during its enforceable lifespan.

3. Strategic Positioning

Patentholders may strengthen their position through:

  • Method-of-use claims covering novel therapeutic indications.
  • Formulation claims for improved bioavailability or patient compliance.
  • Extended patent portfolios to cover derivatives or polymorphs.

Conclusion

MX2010013557 illustrates a strategic, narrowly or broadly scoped pharmaceutical patent typical in Mexico’s evolving IP environment. Its claims likely ambitiously aim to protect specific chemical entities with therapeutic value, while its position within the landscape must be contextualized amid existing prior art and potential patenting strategies.

Effective patent management requires monitoring claim scope, challenging invalidity, and leveraging legal tools to maximize exclusivity rights.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of MX2010013557 is largely determined by its chemical structure and formulation claims, with potential for broad or narrow protection.
  • Claims interpretation is critical; precise wording enhances enforceability.
  • The patent landscape in Mexico involves navigating prior art, potential challenges, and regional treaties such as PAFTA.
  • Regular landscape analysis helps identify infringement risks and opportunity spaces for generics or biosimilars.
  • Strategic patenting, including multiple filings, method claims, and formulation coverage, prolongs market exclusivity.

FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of claim broadness in Mexican pharmaceutical patents?
Broader claims offer wider protection but face higher scrutiny during examination. Narrow claims are easier to defend but limit protection scope.

Q2: How does Mexican patent law handle challenges based on prior art?
Third parties can file invalidity or non-use actions based on prior art disclosures, which courts determine using established criteria for novelty and inventive step.

Q3: Can a patent like MX2010013557 be enforced against generics in Mexico?
Yes, provided the patent is valid and the generic product falls within the claim scope, patent holders can seek injunctive relief and damages.

Q4: How does Mexico’s patent landscape impact pharmaceutical innovation?
Robust patent rights incentivize innovation but require balancing with public access, especially in essential medicines.

Q5: What strategies do patent owners use to extend patent life?
Filing divisional applications, secondary patents covering formulations or methods, and patenting derivatives or polymorphs.


References

  1. Mexican Industrial Property Law (Ley de la Propiedad Industrial).
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent database.
  3. Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) official publications.
  4. Relevant case law and legal commentaries on Mexican pharmaceutical patent law.

Note: Due to limited publicly available details on patent MX2010013557, some assumptions are made based on standard practices in pharmaceutical patent filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.