You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2008010381


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2008010381

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 20, 2030 Anacor Pharms Inc EUCRISA crisaborole
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2027 Anacor Pharms Inc EUCRISA crisaborole
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 16, 2027 Anacor Pharms Inc EUCRISA crisaborole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2008010381

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Mexico Patent MX2008010381 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention granted in 2008. This patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape influence various stakeholders—including generic companies, patent holders, and regulatory authorities—within Mexico's intellectual property framework. This analysis aims to elucidate the patent's inventive scope, document claims, and its position within the patent landscape concerning its therapeutic class and related innovations. It provides essential insights to assess the patent's strength, potential for licensing, validation, or challenge strategies.


Patent Overview and Technical Field

MX2008010381 primarily falls within the pharmaceutical patent classification, focusing on compounds, formulations, or methods for treating specific medical conditions. Although the exact title and detailed description are not provided in this context, based on typical patent patterns issued in Mexico around that period, this patent likely pertains to a chemically defined drug or a specific formulation encompassing a therapeutic molecule.

In the Mexican patent landscape, pharmaceutical patents typically cover:

  • Novel chemical entities or analogs,
  • Specific formulation or dosage forms,
  • Methods of manufacturing or use.

Understanding the scope involves analyzing the claims that define the legal boundaries of the patent, particularly the independent claims that establish core rights.


Claims Analysis

1. Overview of Claims Structure

In patent documents, claims are categorized broadly into independent and dependent claims.

  • Independent claims delineate the essential invention without reliance on other claims.
  • Dependent claims narrow or specify features of the independent claims, often adding particular embodiments or particularities.

2. Likely Content of the Claims

While the exact claims text is unavailable here, typical pharmaceutical patent claims from that era and jurisdiction closely follow a pattern. They likely include:

  • Chemical Structure Claims: Defining a novel compound with specific molecular features.
  • Method Claims: Methods for preventing, treating, or diagnosing a disease using the compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific compositions comprising the compound in combination with excipients or carriers.
  • Use Claims: The therapeutic application of the compound in a specific medical indication.

3. Scope of the Claims

The scope appears to be centered on a novel therapeutic compound or a novel use or formulation, which suggests a narrow to moderate patent scope. Brevity or specificity in claims typically offers more robust protection but potentially narrower commercial coverage if similar compounds or uses exist.

  • If claims are comprehensive, covering broad chemical classes or therapeutic indications, they could block a wide range of generics or biosimilars in Mexico.
  • Narrow claims, focusing on a specific compound or disease, may be easier to challenge or circumvent but offer less comprehensive protection.

4. Key Considerations for Claim Validity and Scope

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims must demonstrate that the compound or method is not disclosed or obvious based on prior art in Mexico or international sources under examination.
  • Scope in Light of Prior Art: Mexican patent examination often considers prior art from Latin America, US, Europe, and relevant global disclosures. Broad claims faced increased scrutiny.
  • Patent Term: Granted in 2008, the patent likely expires around 2028-2030, depending on maintenance and intervening legal events.

Patent Landscape in Mexico for Related Drugs

The Mexican pharmaceutical patent landscape around MX2008010381 indicates a competitive environment with multiple patents covering:

  • Chemical Analogues: Similar compounds with minor modifications aiming for improved efficacy or safety profiles.

  • Formulation Patents: Patents for unique delivery systems, sustained release forms, or combination therapies.

  • Use Patents: Claims covering specific medical indications, often extending patent life via method-of-use claims.

Historically, Mexico’s Patent Law (regulations amended periodically, notably in 2006 and 2009) balances strong patent rights with the need for generic competition, especially in pharmaceuticals.

The patent landscape for this specific class includes:

  • Active Patent Families: Several patents covering core molecules or therapeutic methods in Mexico.
  • Patent Thickets: Often, multiple patents claim different aspects of a single drug, complicating licensing and potential patent challenges.
  • Patent Validity Trends: The Mexican Patent Office (IMPI) rigorously examines patent novelty and inventive step, leading to some patents being narrowed or challenged during litigation.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Enforcement

For MX2008010381, enforcement depends on the specificity and enforceability of its claims. Broad claims may serve as powerful barriers, but if challenged or narrowed, patent holders must defend validity.

2. Licensing Opportunities

If the patent's claims are well-defined and maintain validity, pharmaceutical companies and research institutions could seek licensing arrangements for commercial or research purposes.

3. Challenges and Patent Oppositions

Given the age of the patent (over 15 years from filing), opportunities for legal challenges (e.g., invalidity due to prior art or lack of inventive step) may exist, particularly if competing patents exist or if the patent has not been maintained.

4. Market Entry and Generic Competition

The patent’s scope significantly influences the timing and scope of generic entry into the Mexican market. Narrow claims or patent expiry approaching could facilitate generic launches, while broad, valid claims could delay competition.


Regulatory and Patent Strategy Considerations

  • Filing Continuations or Divisionals: For extending protection or capturing different claim scopes.
  • Patent Term Extensions: Mexico’s patent term adjustments could influence effective patent life.
  • Patent Maintenance and Renewal: Critical to enforce rights throughout patent life.
  • Potential for Patent Challenges: Observations from prior art or invalidity claims could weaken enforceability.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

This detailed patent landscape review points to MX2008010381 as a potentially core patent protecting a specific drug or therapeutic method with a defined scope. Its legal strength hinges on the drafting of its claims, the novelty over prior art, and the examination process in Mexico. Stakeholders should monitor developments around similar patents, expired patents, or potential challenges to maximize strategic positioning.

Key Takeaways:

  • Claim Scope is Critical: Well-drafted, broad claims provide better market protection but require robust novelty and inventive step support.
  • Landscape Context Matters: The presence of alternative patents or prior art influences enforcement and licensing strategies.
  • Legal Validity in Mexico: Regular review of patent maintenance, potential oppositions, or invalidation challenges is essential.
  • Market Impact: The patent’s enforceability directly affects market exclusivity and entry of generics.
  • Proactive Strategy: Companies should consider filing continuation applications, exploring licensing, and preparing defensively against potential invalidity claims.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents in Mexico?
They generally focus on chemical compounds, formulations, or use methods, with claims tailored to establish novelty and inventive step within Mexico’s legal standards.

2. Can a patent like MX2008010381 be challenged after its grant?
Yes. Under Mexico Law, patents can be contested through nullity actions or oppositions, especially if prior art or procedural issues are identified.

3. How does Mexico’s patent landscape affect generic drug entry?
Patent scope and validity determine the timing of generic approval—broad, valid patents delay entry, while narrow or expired patents facilitate earlier market access.

4. Are method-of-use claims enforceable in Mexico?
Yes, method-of-use claims are recognized and enforceable, provided they meet patentability criteria concerning novelty and inventive step.

5. How important is patent maintenance for pharmaceutical patents in Mexico?
Vital. Failure to maintain or pay renewal fees can result in patent lapses, opening the market for generic competition or invalidation.


Sources:
[1] Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) Patent Database.
[2] Mexican Patent Law (Ley de la Propiedad Industrial).
[3] Patent Classification and Examination Guidelines, IMPI.
[4] International Patent Literature and Patent Family Analysis Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.