You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Lithuania Patent: 3371171


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Lithuania Patent: 3371171

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 1, 2036 Rigel Pharms GAVRETO pralsetinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Lithuania Drug Patent LT3371171: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 21, 2025

Introduction

The Lithuanian patent LT3371171 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, representing a strategic asset within the scope of intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis provides an in-depth review of the patent's claims and scope to evaluate its market exclusivity, potential infringement risks, and position within the broader patent landscape. Lithuania, as a member of the European Patent Convention (EPC), provides a jurisdictional perspective, with implications for regional and global patent strategy.

Patent Overview and Context

Patent LT3371171 was granted within Lithuania, potentially as a national phase application based on a European or international application. Its designation suggests an inventive step relating to a drug or therapeutic method. The patent's enforcement, scope, and patent landscape interpretation depend on its claims, description, and the technological field.

While specific details of the patent application are not available here, typical pharmaceutical patents encompass claims related to novel compounds, formulations, methods of synthesis, delivery systems, or therapeutic uses. The scope restriction or breadth depends on how explicitly the claims are drafted, which directly influences market exclusivity and licensing opportunities.


Scope of the Patent

1. Claims Analysis

The claims define the legally enforceable bounds of a patent. They typically follow a hierarchy: independent claims delineate the broadest protection, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments or features.

For LT3371171, without access to the full patent text, a general assessment assuming standard pharmaceutical claim structures suggests:

  • Composition Claims: Covering specific drug compounds, often with unique structural features, stereochemistry, or salt forms.
  • Method Claims: Covering therapeutic methods, such as specific dosing regimens or treatment protocols.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering novel formulations, delivery mechanisms, or combination therapies.

The breadth of these claims influences how easily competitors can design around the patent. Broad compound claims potentially block a wide array of similar molecules, whereas narrow claims offer limited coverage.

2. Protective Scope and Limitations

Given the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents, the scope likely includes:

  • Chemical structure or class of compounds or derivatives.
  • Specific pharmaceutical formulations or delivery systems.
  • Therapeutic applications for certain medical conditions.
  • Synthesis methods or manufacturing processes.

Limitations or exclusions may specifically carve out common variants or prior art references, thus constraining the scope.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Position

1. Regional and International Patent Considerations

Lithuania being part of the EPC makes this patent potentially extendable via the European Patent Convention, granting coverage across multiple European countries through a centralized application process. Analyzing whether the applicant filed for expanded European or international patent protection is essential for strategic positioning.

2. Overlap with Existing Patents

Key to understanding the patent landscape is assessing:

  • Prior Art: Existing patents, published applications, or scientific publications that may overlap.
  • Patent Family: Whether this patent is part of a broader family, including counterpart applications in other jurisdictions.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Investigations to ensure the patent does not infringe or is not infringed upon by others.

In drug development, these assessments influence licensing, partnering, or potential patent challenges.

3. Competitor and Innovation Landscape

The pharmaceutical innovation space in Lithuania and the broader EU often involves:

  • Orphan drug designations
  • Biosimilar entries
  • Stepped-out patent families covering first-in-class compounds
  • Patent thickets around flagship drugs

Understanding whether LT3371171 knots into this landscape with similar or novel compounds is crucial for strategic advantage.


Analysis of Patent Protection and Enforcement

1. Durability and Patent Life

Standard patent lifespan calculations indicate protection typically lasts 20 years from the filing date, provided maintenance fees are paid. Given Lithuania's adherence to EPC guidelines, patent term extensions are possible for drugs, compensating for regulatory delays.

2. Patent Challenges and Defense

Pharmaceutical patents are often challenged via:

  • Opposition procedures within the patent office.
  • Legal infringements in courts or through infringement suits.
  • Invalidity actions based on prior art or lack of inventive step.

The strength of LT3371171 depends on the clarity and novelty of its claims, the robustness of disclosure, and the patent’s opposition history.


Key Factors Impacting Patent Scope and Landscape

Factor Description Implication for Patent Scope and Landscape
Claim Breadth Broader claims cover more variants; narrower claims are easier to defend Broader claims increase exclusivity but face higher invalidation risk
Patent Family Multiple jurisdictions expand protection Facilitates regional commercialization strategies
Prior Art Known compounds or methods limit claim scope Necessitates continuous innovation to maintain exclusivity
Patent Quality Clarity, support, and inventive step Affects enforceability and resistance to challenges
Technological Field Competitive landscape and existing patents Guides strategic positioning and R&D focus

Conclusion and Strategic Insights

The Lithuanian patent LT3371171, assuming typical pharmaceutical patent characteristics, likely encompasses a selective scope aimed at protecting specific compounds or therapeutic methods relevant to the applicant’s innovative focus. The scope, governed by the claims' breadth, influences the patent’s enforceability and market exclusivity.

Strategically, firms should:

  • Conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses in Lithuania and Europe.
  • Monitor overlapping patents in the same therapeutic domain.
  • Consider expanding regional patent coverage through European and international filings.
  • Be vigilant about potential patent challenges, particularly if claims are broad.

In the evolving pharmaceutical patent landscape, positioning trade secrets, supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), and lifecycle management strategies enhance the patent’s commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth Determines Market Control: Broader patent claims offer higher competitive barriers but may face higher invalidation risks.
  • Regional and International Extension Is Vital: Leveraging the EPC distinguishes this patent’s scope across multiple jurisdictions.
  • Landscape Awareness Is Critical: Monitoring overlapping patents and prior art ensures freedom to operate.
  • Lifecycle Management Matters: Patent term extensions and supplementary protections can maximize exclusivity.
  • Continual Innovation Is Necessary: Staying ahead requires ongoing R&D aligned with the evolving patent landscape.

FAQs

Q1: Can LT3371171 be challenged or invalidated by competitors?
A: Yes. Competitors can challenge the patent through opposition procedures or invalidity actions based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, particularly if the claims are broad.

Q2: Does Lithuania’s membership in the EPC facilitate broader patent protection?
A: Absolutely. The European Patent Convention allows validation of patents across multiple European countries, expanding geographical protection through a single application process.

Q3: How does claim scope influence enforcement strategies?
A: Broader claims provide wider protection but are more susceptible to validity challenges. Narrow claims are easier to defend but may offer limited exclusivity.

Q4: What is the significance of patent families in the pharmaceutical sector?
A: Patent families help extend protection internationally, create blocking positions, and facilitate licensing opportunities, thereby enhancing market exclusivity.

Q5: What role do supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) play for drugs in Lithuania?
A: SPCs extend patent protection beyond the usual 20-year term to compensate for regulatory approval delays, preserving market exclusivity.


References:
[1] European Patent Office. “Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office.” 2022.
[2] Lithuanian State Patent Bureau. Patent Law. 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.