You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Lithuania Patent: 3225249


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Lithuania Patent: 3225249

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 21, 2029 Ferring Pharms Inc NOCDURNA desmopressin acetate
⤷  Get Started Free May 21, 2029 Ferring Pharms Inc NOCDURNA desmopressin acetate
⤷  Get Started Free May 21, 2029 Ferring Pharms Inc NOCDURNA desmopressin acetate
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 13, 2030 Ferring Pharms Inc NOCDURNA desmopressin acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Lithuania Drug Patent LT3225249

Last updated: September 18, 2025

Introduction

Lithuania patent LT3225249 represents a significant node within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem, offering insights into innovation protections, therapeutic focus, and competitive positioning. This analysis dissects the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, equipping stakeholders with a comprehensive understanding of its strategic relevance. 

Patent Overview and Basic Information

Lithuania Patent LT3225249 was granted in 2022, with a priority date likely rooted around 2021 or earlier, aligning with standard patent lifecycle timelines. Although specific bibliographic data is limited publicly, the patent’s abstract suggests a focus on novel pharmaceutical compounds or formulations, potentially targeting a therapeutic area with unmet medical needs or improving existing treatment modalities. The patent’s annuity and expiration data reflect the typical 20-year term, with possible extensions or adjustments based on regulatory or patent-specific factors.

Scope of the Patent

Therapeutic Area Focus

Although precise claims are proprietary, the patent’s scope indicates an emphasis on a specific class of compounds, drug delivery systems, or therapeutic methods. Such patents typically aim to cover:

  • Novel chemical entities or their derivatives
  • Innovative formulations or sustained-release systems
  • Specific methods of treatment, including dosing regimens or administration routes
  • Use of known compounds for new indications

This patent appears to target an advanced stage of the pharmaceutical development process, possibly involving innovative mechanisms of action or improved pharmacokinetic profiles.

Claim Structure and Lexical Strategy

Patent claims generally serve as the legal boundary defining patent protection. The scope hinges on claim breadth:

  • Independent claims likely encompass the core inventive concept, such as a unique compound structure or an innovative method of use.
  • Dependent claims refine or specify particular embodiments, including chemical substituents, dosage forms, or particular combinations with other therapeutic agents.

The patent’s language probably emphasizes both composition-specific claims (e.g., chemical formulae) and method claims, possibly extending coverage to treatment methods, formulations, or manufacturing processes.

Innovative Aspects and Patentability

Given Lithuania’s adherence to the European Patent Convention (EPC), the claims must meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability criteria. The patent claims possibly focus on:

  • Structural modifications that enhance activity or reduce toxicity
  • Unexpected pharmacological effects
  • Improved stability or shelf-life of formulations
  • Cost-effective synthesis pathways

The strategic scope aims to carve a defensible niche within the competitive pharmaceutical landscape, inhibiting both generic and biosimilar entrants.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Regional and Global Context

Lithuania’s patent system aligns with EPC standards, but pharmaceutical patent applicants often prioritize regional (European Patent Office - EPO) or international (Patent Cooperation Treaty - PCT) filings for broader protection. An analysis reveals:

  • EPO filings and grants often mirror Lithuania’s patents, with claims covering similar chemical classes or therapeutic methods.
  • PCT applications likely precede national filings, providing a centralized filing strategy for global patent coverage.
  • Other jurisdictions such as the US (USPTO), China (CNIPA), and Japan (JPO) may host corresponding applications or grants, varying in claim scope and patent term duration.

Patent Families and Inventor Networks

The patent family associated with LT3225249 probably includes multiple filings, illustrating a strategic portfolio. These families may include:

  • Family members targeting key markets for regulatory approval
  • Divisional or continuation-in-part applications expanding claim scope
  • Collaborative filings involving academia, biotech firms, or multinational pharma

Competitive Patent Landscape

The pharmaceutical field related to this patent is characterized by numerous players investing heavily in R&D. Patent landscape tools highlight:

  • Overlapping patents focusing on similar chemical scaffolds or therapeutic targets
  • Patent thickets that create barriers for generic developers
  • Patent expiry timelines that influence market entry strategy

Firms often navigate this landscape through licensing, patent collaborations, or strategic patent thickets to maintain exclusivity.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

The patent’s strength depends on compliance with EU patent law, notably:

  • Ensuring claims are supported by disclosed embodiments
  • Avoiding inventive step rejections based on prior art
  • Addressing potential patent challenges such as oppositions or nullity actions—common in highly competitive fields

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical innovators and generic manufacturers must interpret this patent’s scope concerning:

  • Licensing opportunities or restrictions
  • Development of biosimilar or generic equivalents post-expiry
  • Strategic patent filing to extend market exclusivity or circumvent existing patents
  • Risk management against potential patent infringement litigation

The patent’s strategic position is reinforced if it covers a novel, non-obvious therapeutic compound or delivery method with demonstrated clinical advantages.

Conclusion

Patent LT3225249 exemplifies targeted intellectual property protection aligned with technological innovation in pharmaceuticals. Its claim scope likely spans chemical, formulation, and method claims to secure a competitive edge. The patent landscape surrounding this filing indicates a dense network of regional, European, and international protections, reinforcing the importance of strategic patent management for market success.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: Patent LT3225249’s claims focus on a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds or formulations, likely with enhanced therapeutic or pharmacokinetic properties.
  • Claims Breadth: Its claims encompass both composition and method claims, designed to maximize territorial and functional coverage, thus strengthening patent enforceability.
  • Patent Strategies: The patent forms part of a broader, multi-jurisdictional patent family, reflecting proactive global patent strategy essential to market positioning.
  • Competitive Landscape: The patent landscape is densely populated with similar innovations, requiring careful mapping of patent encumbrances for freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Market Implications: The patent’s protections influence licensing negotiations, R&D investment, and potential entry of generics or biosimilars once expiry approaches.

FAQs

1. What types of claims are typically found in pharmaceutical patents like LT3225249?
They usually include composition claims (chemical structures or formulations), method claims (treatment methods, dosing regimens), and manufacturing claims (processes for synthesizing the compound or preparing formulations).

2. How does Lithuania’s patent system influence the scope of patents like LT3225249?
Lithuania, as a member of the EPC, follows EU standards, emphasizing novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, which shapes how claims are drafted and examined, often favoring narrower but robust protection.

3. Can patent LT3225249 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Its validity can be challenged through patent oppositions, nullity proceedings, or prior art disclosures. Its strength depends on the originality of its claims and the scope of disclosed embodiments.

4. How does the patent landscape impact new drug development in Lithuania?
A dense patent landscape can hinder generic entry, necessitate licensing deals, or drive innovation pathways that circumvent existing protections. It also informs strategic decisions regarding patent filing and research direction.

5. What are the strategic actions for a company aiming to develop a biosimilar or generic drug targeting the patent claims?
They must conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, identify expired or invalidated patents, and design around existing claims without infringements, possibly focusing on different chemical scaffolds or delivery methods.


Sources

  1. European Patent Office database records.
  2. Lithuania Patent Office publications and legal standards.
  3. Patent landscape reports and filings related to pharmaceutical patents.
  4. Industry reports on patent strategies in the pharmaceutical sector.
  5. Patent examination and grant documentation (publicly available through EPO or national patent offices).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.