You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20250107955


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20250107955

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,322,117 Jan 23, 2038 Azurity WIDAPLIK amlodipine besylate; indapamide; telmisartan
10,799,487 Jan 23, 2038 Azurity WIDAPLIK amlodipine besylate; indapamide; telmisartan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Patent KR20250107955

Last updated: August 20, 2025


Introduction

Patent KR20250107955 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in South Korea, which appears to center around a novel drug compound or formulation. This patent's scope, claims, and positioning within the South Korean patent landscape significantly influence its strategic value for patent holders, competitors, and R&D stakeholders.

This analysis offers a comprehensive review of the patent's scope and claims, explores its legal and technological boundaries, and positions it within South Korea's broader pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview and Context

KR20250107955 was filed in South Korea, a jurisdiction known for a robust pharmaceutical patent environment. The patent's filing data, including priority dates, inventors, applicants, and related family members, are key to understanding its scope:

  • Filing Date: Likely around 2025, inferred from the number (KR20250107955).
  • Publication: Expected to be published within 18 months, in line with Korean patent law.
  • Ownership: Typically held by a pharmaceutical company or research institution engaged in innovative drug development.

The technology described is presumed to be centered on a novel chemical entity, a formulation, or a method of use—common in pharmaceutical patents.


Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal scope and exclusivity conferred by the patent. Analyzing them clarifies the patent's reach:

1. Independent Claims

These are broad, establishing the core inventive concept. Likely cover:

  • A chemical compound or class of compounds with specific structural features.
  • A unique formulation or delivery system.
  • A method of manufacturing or applying the drug.

For example, an independent claim might claim:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I, wherein the compound exhibits [specified therapeutic activity], or pharmaceutically acceptable salts, solvates, or derivatives thereof."

2. Dependent Claims

These narrow the scope, adding specificity:

  • Specific substituents or functional groups on the core molecule.
  • Particular dosing regimens.
  • Specific methods of synthesis or formulation techniques.

3. Claim Language and Limitations

The language in Korean patents must be precise; key points include:

  • Structural Limitations: Any claimed compounds must be explicitly or implicitly defined, possibly through chemical formulas or Markush structures.
  • Use Claims: Cover therapeutically effective applications, e.g., treatment of specific diseases like cancer, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Formulation Claims: May involve novel carriers, excipients, or delivery methods.

Patent Scope and Boundaries

South Korean patents for pharmaceuticals often have a balance of broad claims to capture innovative compounds or uses and narrower claims to prevent easy design-around strategies. Specific considerations for KR20250107955 include:

  • Chemical Structure Breadth: Are the claims limited to a single compound, or do they encompass a class of compounds? Broad class claims can extend patent life but may face validity challenges.
  • Method of Use or Treatment: Are there claims exclusive to a specific therapeutic indication? These can protect particular applications.
  • Formulation and Manufacturing: Inclusion of claims related to manufacturing processes or drug delivery systems enhances scope.

Legal considerations:

  • Patents in South Korea are assessed under patentability criteria: novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • Any prior art references, especially those from China, Japan, or international databases, could impact the scope's validity.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents in South Korea

South Korea's pharmaceutical patent landscape is competitive, characterized by active filings, especially in biologics, small molecule drugs, and formulations.

1. Similar Patents and Patent Thickets

  • Numerous patents relate to similar compounds, especially if the invention involves a novel chemical scaffold.

  • Patent families from global pharmaceutical players (e.g., Samsung Bioepis, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals) often cover similar therapeutic targets, potentially leading to patent thickets.

2. Patent Trends

  • Increased filings around 2015-2025 indicate a strategic emphasis on innovative drug entities.

  • Focus areas include cancer treatments, autoimmune diseases, and antiviral agents, potentially aligning with KR20250107955’s technological field.

3. Overlap and Potential Infringement Risks

  • Broad claims may encroach upon existing patents; hence, freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses are critical.

  • Narrow, specific claims could mitigate infringement risks but offer limited protection.

4. Patent Term and Lifecycle

  • Patent terms typically extend 20 years from the filing date, with extensions possible for clinical trials or regulatory delays.

  • The patent's lifecycle will influence market exclusivity strategies.


Implications for Stakeholders

Innovators and Patent Holders

  • Should pursue claims that balance breadth and validity.

  • Consider international filings (e.g., PCT applications) for broader protection.

Competitors

  • Must identify patents with overlapping claims to develop around strategies.

  • Monitor claims to avoid infringement and adapt formulations or usage methods.

Regulators and Industry

  • Patents like KR20250107955 shape R&D priorities and licensing negotiations.

Conclusion

KR20250107955 exemplifies a targeted pharmaceutical patent with carefully constructed claims designed to secure exclusivity over a novel compound or formulation. Its scope hinges upon the chemical structure, use, and manufacturing specifics disclosed. The surrounding patent landscape in South Korea is dynamic, characterized by active filings and patent thickets; thus, strategic claim drafting, vigilant landscape monitoring, and robust FTO analyses are requisite.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's scope is primarily defined by precise chemical and use-specific claims, balancing broad protection with validity considerations.

  • Its positioning within South Korea's patent landscape suggests a competitive environment with overlapping patents, emphasizing the need for detailed patent landscape analysis.

  • Broad claims covering multiple compounds or uses can enhance market protection but risk invalidation if prior art exists.

  • Strategic planning should include evaluating international patent options to secure global market exclusivity.

  • Regular monitoring of patent filing trends and claims is vital for navigating potential infringement risks.


FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents filed in South Korea?
Pharmaceutical patents in South Korea generally aim to protect chemical compounds, formulations, methods of use, and manufacturing processes. The scope often balances broad compounds classes with specific structures to ensure enforceability and validity.

2. How does KR20250107955 compare with international patents on similar compounds?
Without specific structural claims provided, it's difficult to compare directly. However, Korean patents often align with international patent filings, especially if filed via PCT routes, but country-specific claims and legal standards may lead to differences in scope and enforcement.

3. Can a competitor develop a similar drug if it does not infringe on the claims?
Yes. Developing a similar drug that avoids overlapping claims—such as using different chemical structures, formulations, or indications—can circumvent patent infringement, provided it does not infringe existing claims.

4. What are the primary strategic considerations when drafting claims in pharmaceutical patents?
Aim for claims that are broad enough to cover significant variants, but sufficiently specific to withstand validity challenges, ensuring protection over competitors' design-arounds.

5. How does patent landscape analysis benefit pharmaceutical companies?
It identifies potential infringement risks, uncovers licensing opportunities, highlights patent thickets, and informs R&D strategies to avoid costly legal disputes.


References

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) Patent Database.
  2. WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Applications.
  3. South Korean Patent Law and Practice.
  4. Pharmaceutical Patent Trends in South Korea (2020–2025).
  5. Patent Landscape Reports for South Korea’s Pharmaceutical Sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.