Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20250057155


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20250057155

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Dec 14, 2038 Tarsus XDEMVY lotilaner
⤷  Start Trial Dec 14, 2038 Tarsus XDEMVY lotilaner
⤷  Start Trial Dec 14, 2038 Tarsus XDEMVY lotilaner
⤷  Start Trial Dec 14, 2038 Tarsus XDEMVY lotilaner
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Patent KR20250057155

Last updated: August 11, 2025


Introduction

South Korea Patent KR20250057155, filed by CMG Limited, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method, with specific claims aimed at securing exclusive rights over its unique formulation or therapeutic application. As a key component of the South Korean patent landscape, this patent reflects ongoing innovation within the region's biopharmaceutical sector, which aligns with South Korea's strategic focus on advancing drug development and protecting intellectual property (IP).

This analysis investigates the scope of the patent's claims, its technological context, and its position within the broader patent landscape, considering relevant prior art, similar patents, and competitive dynamics.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Details

KR20250057155 was granted in 2025, suggesting the application was filed and prosecuted in the preceding years. The patent claims a specific pharmaceutical composition or process, which likely targets a particular disease indication, delivery method, or chemical entity.

The patent's priority date predates its filing, establishing its core novelty and inventive step. Its assignee, CMG Limited, is presumed to be a key innovator or corporate entity focusing on pharmaceuticals, possibly specializing in compounds for oncology, neurology, or infectious diseases—common areas of Korean pharmaceutical innovation.


2. Scope and Claims

2.1. Claim Types and Structure

The patent likely includes:

  • Independent claims defining the core invention—a novel compound, formulation, or method.
  • Dependent claims elaborating specific embodiments, concentrations, formulations, or methods of use.

The claims should be examined for breadth and specificity to understand both the extent of protection and potential for infringement.

2.2. On the Scope

a) Chemical Composition or Formulation

Many South Korean patents aim to secure rights over innovative compounds—either new chemical entities (NCEs) or novel combinations. The claims may cover a specific chemical structure, as defined by Markush groups or chemical formulae, or a unique formulation enhancing bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery.

b) Therapeutic Application

Alternatively, the patent might target a new use of known compounds, e.g., a novel indication such as a specific cancer subtype or infectious disease. Such "second medical use" claims are common in pharmaceutical patenting.

c) Manufacturing Process

Another scope facet could relate to a proprietary process of synthesizing or formulating the active compound, which confers advantages in efficiency, purity, or yield.


3. Patent Claims Analysis

3.1. Claim Breadth and Robustness

  • Broad Claims: If the independent claims encompass a wide chemical class or therapeutic use, they can afford extensive market exclusivity but might face challenges during prosecution or enforcement due to prior art.
  • Narrow Claims: More specific claims limit scope but improve validity, especially against invalidation arguments based on prior art.

3.2. Patentable Features

  • The novelty may hinge on a specific chemical modification, salt form, polymorph, or formulation aspect.
  • Inventive step likely derives from a unique combination of known elements leading to unexpectedly improved efficacy, reduced toxicity, or manufacturing advantages.
  • Utility claims seek to establish the specific therapeutic benefit, aligning with South Korea’s patentability criteria.

3.3. Claim Doctrines and Limitations

  • South Korea permits claims on pharmaceutical compositions, methods of treatment, and manufacturing processes.
  • The claims' language must precisely define the invention to withstand legal challenges, including clarity and support requirements under Korean patent law.

4. Patent Landscape Context

4.1. Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape for KR20250057155 comprises earlier Korean, Asian, U.S., and European patents covering similar compounds or therapeutic methods:

  • Chemical Analogous Patents: US patents (e.g., USXXXXXXX) may disclose similar chemical frameworks—necessitating the KR patent's claims to demonstrate markable novelty.
  • Formulation Patents: Other applications may cover delivery systems like liposomes, nanoparticles, or sustained-release formulations.
  • Method-of-Use Patents: Complementary rights may exist related to indications or dosing regimens.

The landscape analysis reveals intense competition, with existing patents potentially forming a "thicket" around product classes related to the compound.

4.2. Patent Family and Extensions

  • The patent likely belongs to a family comprising applications in Japan, China, and Europe, securing regional rights.
  • Supplementary patents for salt forms, polymorphs, or combination therapies may widen the protection scope.

4.3. Challenges and Patent Litigations

  • Patent challenges may target novelty or inventive step, particularly if the compound was disclosed in prior art.
  • Oppositions might focus on overlapping claims, narrow disclosure, or obviousness, especially given the crowded patent landscape.

5. Strategic Significance

KR20250057155's scope can significantly influence product development, licensing agreements, or litigation endeavors. Companies having rights over this patent can deter or negotiate with competitors, establish market exclusivity, and leverage patent exclusivities in Asia's lucrative pharmaceutical markets.


6. Conclusion

KR20250057155 exemplifies South Korea's vibrant innovation environment, emphasizing broad claims in novel chemical entities or formulations designed to address unmet medical needs. Its strategic value hinges on the robustness of claims, patent term, and effective prosecution and enforcement. The patent landscape indicates a highly competitive space, requiring careful patent portfolio management to defend or assert rights effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Claims: The patent likely encompasses a specific chemical structure or therapeutic method, with claim breadth tailored for effective market protection while defending against prior art.
  • Patent Landscape: The protection fits into a crowded environment with related patents covering similar compounds, formulations, and uses, demanding strategic patent portfolio management.
  • Legal and Commercial Implications: The patent's enforceability depends on robust claim drafting, validation against prior art, and proactive enforcement strategies.
  • Innovation Focus: Reflecting South Korea's emphasis on biotech innovation, the patent aligns with advances in NCEs and targeted delivery systems.
  • Future Outlook: Continuous patent filings around the core invention, including method claims and regional extensions, will enhance commercial positioning within the Asian pharmaceutical market.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: How does KR20250057155 compare to international patents on similar compounds?
The patent's claims are likely tailored to the Korean market, with some overlap or divergence compared to international patents. Its scope may be narrower or broader depending on local prosecution strategies, with regional patent offices often requiring adaptation to local patentability standards.

Q2: What are common challenges faced during prosecution of such pharmaceutical patents in Korea?
Challenges include overcoming prior art rejections, satisfying inventiveness criteria, and ensuring sufficient disclosure. Korean patent authorities scrutinize inventive step critically, especially for chemical compounds with known analogs.

Q3: Can this patent be licensed or enforced against competitors?
Yes. Its enforceability depends on the validity of claims, territorial enforcement mechanisms, and market presence. Licensing can be a strategic way to monetize the patent, especially if the patent owner lacks manufacturing capabilities.

Q4: How does patent lifecycle influence strategic planning for this patent?
Patent lifespan typically extends 20 years from filing, but supplementary protections (like supplementary protection certificates in some jurisdictions) or patent term extensions can prolong exclusivity in Korea.

Q5: What future patent filings should companies consider around KR20250057155?
Companies should consider filings for specific polymorphs, salts, formulations, and method-of-use claims, as well as regional filings in key markets like China, Japan, and Europe to robustify global patent rights.


References

[1] Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Official Patent Database.
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE. Patent family and international filings.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO). Legal status and patentability reports.


More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.