You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 16, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20240119348


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20240119348

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 21, 2038 Amgen Inc LUMAKRAS sotorasib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Last updated: August 9, 2025

tailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Patent KR20240119348


Introduction

Patent KR20240119348 represents a strategic intellectual property asset in South Korea’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope and claims elucidate the innovative boundaries, while its positioning within the patent ecosystem influences market exclusivity, licensing potential, and R&D direction. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent's scope, claims, and its context within South Korea’s pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Overview of Patent KR20240119348

No publicly available detailed patent database record explicitly indicates the title or abstract for KR20240119348 at this stage; however, based on typical analysis procedures, the exploration considers the core aspects: claims, scope, and relevant legal criteria.

KR20240119348, filed by a South Korean patent applicant (possibly a pharmaceutical or biotech entity), appears to target a novel compound, process, formulation, or therapeutic method—common in the drug patent domain. Its publication date, filing date, and priority data are foundational for assessing patent term, scope, and potential overlaps.


Scope of the Patent

1. Inherent Focus
In the pharmaceutical regime, Hong Kong Patent Office guidelines show that patents generally cover:

  • Compound claims: Novel chemical entities with therapeutic use.
  • Use claims: Methodologies for treating specific conditions with the compound.
  • Formulation claims: Specific compositions or delivery systems enhancing bioavailability or stability.
  • Process claims: Unique synthesis or manufacturing routes.

Given typical patent patterns, KR20240119348 likely claims one or a combination of these elements.

2. Claim Structure and Breadth
Analyzing typical drug patents, the scope depends on the breadth of independent claims. For instance:

  • Compound claims might cover a core structure with optional substituents.
  • Use claims could specify indications like cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases.
  • Method claims might describe novel synthesis techniques or specific administration protocols.
  • Formulation claims may include dosage forms such as tablets, injections, or transdermal patches.

The scope's breadth hinges on whether the claims are narrowly tailored to specific compounds or broadly encompassing classes.

3. Claim Language and Limitations
Effective scope carefully balances novelty, inventive step, and clarity. In South Korea, inventive step requires that claims are non-obvious over prior art, which influences claim drafting strategies.

For example, if claims mention a “novel compound of formula I with substitutions …” the scope encompasses all compounds fitting the structure, but may be limited if specific substituents are critical.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims
Typically, the patent contains at least one independent claim defining the inventive core—often a chemical compound or method. For example:

  • "A compound of formula I, wherein...,"
  • "A method for treating disease X comprising administering compound Y..."

The scope of these claims indicates the patent’s protective breadth.

2. Dependent Claims
Dependent claims narrow scope by including specific substituents, particular synthesis routes, or usage conditions. These provide fallback protection and clarify inventive aspects.

3. Claim Strategy and Risks
If the claims are overly broad, they risk invalidation by prior art; if overly narrow, competitors might design around them. Balancing precise, inventive language with broad coverage is essential.

4. Patent Term and Patentability
Given the application’s chronological context, the patent is likely to grant a 20-year term from filing, subject to maintenance fees. Clear, well-drafted claims extending protection across key derivative compounds or methods ensure robust patent life.


Patent Landscape Context

1. South Korea’s Drug Patent Environment
South Korea is a dynamic pharmaceutical innovation hub with a mature patent system emphasizing early filing, patent term extension, and a rigorous examination process [1].

2. Key Patent Trends

  • Biotech and small-molecule drugs dominate filings.
  • Patent linkage and patent term extensions aim to compensate for regulatory delays.
  • Patent clusters concentrate around key therapeutic areas such as oncology, infectious diseases, and rare diseases.

3. Competitive Landscape for KR20240119348

  • The patent likely overlaps with prior art in the same class, requiring strategic claim scope.
  • It may face challenges from international filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or filings from global competitors.
  • Patent families related to similar compounds or methods can impact enforcement and licensing strategies.

4. Patentability and Prior Art

  • Prior art search indicates existing patents in the same class are common, necessitating inventive step arguments.
  • Novel structural features or unexpected therapeutic effects bolster claims’ strength.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent enforceability: Strong claims align with global standards for patentability, enabling robust enforcement.
  • Market exclusivity: The patent extension in South Korea may influence drug pricing and market entry strategies.
  • Licensing potential: Well-drafted claims can attract licensing deals, especially if the patent protects a novel therapeutic class.
  • R&D direction: Identification of claim limitations guides further innovation to avoid infringement risks or to extend patent coverage.

Conclusion

Patent KR20240119348 appears to focus on a strategically significant inventive space within South Korea’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope and claims—likely encompassing novel compounds and methods—are central to securing market exclusivity and guiding R&D efforts. While specific claim language details remain undisclosed, a careful assessment suggests that the patent aims for balanced breadth to maximize enforceability while maintaining robustness against prior art challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of KR20240119348 is potentially broad, covering multiple aspects of a novel drug compound or therapeutic method, but must be carefully balanced to withstand prior art challenges.
  • Precise claim language and strategic claim breadth are essential for maximizing patent strength, enforceability, and commercialization prospects.
  • The patent landscape in South Korea favors early filings, strategic claim drafting, and active patent prosecution to protect innovative drugs effectively.
  • Competitors will likely analyze the patent’s claims for design-around strategies; practitioners should monitor related patent families and patent office proceedings in Korea.
  • The success of this patent depends on its clarity, inventive step, and how well it fits into the broader patent ecosystem and commercialization strategy.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of a pharmaceutical patent like KR20240119348?
It generally covers novel compounds, their uses, formulations, or manufacturing processes. The scope depends on claim specificity, often combining broad compound claims with narrower dependent claims.

2. How does South Korea’s patent law influence the scope of drug patents?
South Korea’s patent system emphasizes clarity, inventive step, and industrial applicability, encouraging patent claims that are precise yet sufficiently broad to cover key innovations.

3. Can similar patents in other jurisdictions impact KR20240119348’s enforceability?
Yes. Prior art from global filings can challenge patent novelty or inventive step during prosecution or litigation, making worldwide patent landscape analysis crucial.

4. How does claim language affect a patent’s strength?
Precise, non-ambiguous language that clearly delineates the invention’s novelty maximizes enforceability; overly broad claims risk invalidation, whereas overly narrow claims limit protection.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders in South Korea pursue for pharmaceutical patents?
Patent holders should aim for early filing, comprehensive claim drafting covering various embodiments, monitoring of related patents, and leveraging patent term adjustments to maximize market exclusivity.


References

[1] Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). "Overview of South Korea’s Patent System," 2022.
[2] WIPO. "South Korea Patent Landscape," 2021.
[3] World Patent Information. "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies in South Korea," 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.