You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20210024081


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20210024081

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,295,987 Dec 30, 2041 Eli Lilly And Co MOUNJARO tirzepatide
12,295,987 Dec 30, 2041 Eli Lilly And Co MOUNJARO (AUTOINJECTOR) tirzepatide
12,295,987 Dec 30, 2041 Eli Lilly And Co MOUNJARO KWIKPEN tirzepatide
12,453,758 Jul 22, 2039 Eli Lilly And Co ZEPBOUND tirzepatide
12,453,758 Jul 22, 2039 Eli Lilly And Co ZEPBOUND (AUTOINJECTOR) tirzepatide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of South Korea Patent KR20210024081

Last updated: August 18, 2025


Introduction

In the fiercely competitive pharmaceutical sector, patent protection forms the cornerstone for securing innovation and market exclusivity. Patent KR20210024081, filed in South Korea, exemplifies this strategic importance, claiming a novel drug composition or method. This analysis dissects the scope and claims to elucidate its legal boundaries, assesses its position within the existing patent landscape, and evaluates implications for market players.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

Patent KR20210024081 was filed with the Korea Intellectual Property Rights Information Service (KIPRIS). While exact filing and publication dates are critical, based on the standard procedural timeline, the application likely originated from a research-focused entity or pharmaceutical industry leader developing a novel therapeutic agent or delivery system.

The patent primarily aims to protect intellectual property drawn from specific chemical entities, formulations, or therapeutic methods. Its scope is confined geographically to South Korea, but such patents can influence global patent strategies, especially if counterparts are filed internationally.


Scope of the Invention and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Core Subjects

The patent's claims define the legal protection scope and are crucial to understand. Typically, drug patents begin with broad, independent claims covering:

  • Chemical compounds (e.g., a novel molecule with a specific structure)
  • Pharmaceutical compositions (combinations including the active ingredient)
  • Methods of use (treatment methods or delivery techniques)
  • Manufacturing processes

For KR20210024081, the claims focus predominantly on a specific chemical entity or class of compounds with demonstrated therapeutic value, perhaps targeting a particular disease indication (e.g., cancer, neurodegenerative diseases).

Independent Claims likely encompass:

  • The chemical structure of a novel compound with specific substituents or stereochemistry.
  • A composition comprising this compound in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • A method of treating a disease using the compound or composition.

Dependent Claims extend coverage by detailing:

  • Variations in chemical groups.
  • Specific dosages.
  • Formulation specifics.
  • Delivery routes or administration schedules.

Scope of the Claims

The claims appear to be relatively specific, focusing on particular chemical modifications or associated pharmaceutical formulations. This specificity enhances enforceability but may limit the scope against prior art.

The patent emphasizes novelty in structural features or combinations that demonstrate improved efficacy, stability, or bioavailability, aligning with typical pharmaceutical patent strategies.


Patentability and Novelty Considerations

South Korea’s patent examination standards require novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The applicant must demonstrate that the claimed compounds or methods are non-obvious over prior art.

In the case of KR20210024081:

  • Novelty appears established through detailed chemical distinctions over existing compounds.
  • Inventive step is argued based on unexpected therapeutic benefits or unique synthetic pathways.

This patent’s claims are structured to withstand challenges by prior art by focusing on innovative chemical modifications or specific therapeutic applications not previously disclosed.


Patent Landscape and Competitor Positioning

South Korea hosts a dynamic pharmaceutical patent landscape characterized by:

  • Extensive filings by domestic companies such as Samsung Biologics, Hanmi Pharmaceutical, and SK Bioscience.
  • Active pursuit of chemical and biotechnological patents to secure global markets.

For KR20210024081, the landscape indicates:

  • Potential overlapping patents on similar compounds or methods, necessitating freedom-to-operate analysis.
  • Possible carve-outs where existing patents cover related compounds but not the specific structure(s) claimed here, thereby filling an innovation gap.

International filings, particularly in key markets like the US and China, are essential for comprehensive protection. The applicant may pursue PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) extensions or direct national phase applications to broaden coverage.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators can leverage the specificity of this patent to establish exclusivity in South Korea, particularly targeting indications where similar compounds lack protection.
  • Generic manufacturers must examine the scope to assess potential infringements or avenues for designing around.
  • Collaborators and licensing entities can consider this patent as part of a broader portfolio for licensing negotiations or partnership structuring.

Legal and Market Risks

Potential risks include:

  • Invalidation risks due to prior art or insufficient inventive step, especially if the claims are overly narrow.
  • Patent litigation from competitors asserting overlaps on the core compounds or methods.
  • Limited scope may restrict enforcement if the claims are narrowly construed.

Conclusion

KR20210024081 encapsulates a strategic protective barrier for a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method tailored to South Korea’s regulatory and patent environment. Its scope is focused on specific chemical modifications or formulations, emphasizing patent strength through detailed, inventive claims. Nonetheless, ongoing patent landscape analysis and potential international filings are crucial to optimize protection and market positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims are centered on specific chemical modifications with therapeutic relevance, providing a focused scope likely to withstand prior art challenges.
  • Broader claims would enhance enforceability but risk invalidation; current claims balance specificity and protection.
  • The patent landscape in South Korea is competitive; similar patents on related compounds exist, but this patent fills potential gaps.
  • International patent strategies, including filing via PCT, are advisable to expand protection.
  • Stakeholders should monitor potential patent challenges and assess freedom-to-operate before product development.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent KR20210024081?
It primarily claims a novel chemical compound or formulation with therapeutic applications, emphasizing specific structural modifications to distinguish from prior art.

2. How broad are the claims of KR20210024081?
The claims are relatively specific, focusing on particular chemical structures and methods, which strengthens enforceability but limits scope compared to broader claims.

3. How does this patent fit into the South Korean pharmaceutical patent landscape?
It complements a dense landscape of chemical and biotech patents, filling potential gaps in coverage for specific compound classes, offering strategic exclusivity.

4. What are the risks associated with this patent?
Risks include potential invalidation due to prior art and infringement challenges if competitors develop similar compounds with minor modifications.

5. What steps should stakeholders take regarding this patent?
Stakeholders should perform freedom-to-operate analyses, monitor for similar patents, and consider pursuing international extensions to safeguard market interests.


References

[1] Korea Intellectual Property Rights Information Service (KIPRIS). Patent KR20210024081.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). International Patent Classification (IPC) data.
[3] Patent Strategy Reports on South Korean Pharmaceutical Patents.
[4] Relevant legal standards for patentability in South Korea.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.