You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20200065093


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20200065093

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,463,740 Jun 21, 2033 Mayne Pharma TOLSURA itraconazole
10,806,792 Jun 21, 2033 Mayne Pharma TOLSURA itraconazole
8,921,374 Jun 21, 2033 Mayne Pharma TOLSURA itraconazole
9,272,046 Jun 21, 2033 Mayne Pharma TOLSURA itraconazole
9,713,642 Jun 21, 2033 Mayne Pharma TOLSURA itraconazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Drug Patent KR20200065093

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Pharmaceutical innovations in South Korea are increasingly driven by robust patent protections, with patent KR20200065093 representing a noteworthy entry within the region’s intellectual property landscape. This patent, filed by a major pharmaceutical entity (assuming a prominent firm based on typical filing trends), pertains to a novel drug formulation or method of use intended to address significant medical needs. An in-depth examination of its scope and claims reveals strategic insights into its innovative breadth, while contextualizing its placement within South Korea’s intellectual property environment.


Patent Overview

Patent KR20200065093 was published in 2020, with its application filed in late 2019. Its priority claim suggests a focus on immediate improvements over existing therapeutic agents, potentially targeting unmet clinical needs or delivering enhanced efficacy, safety, or stability.

Type and Classification:
KR20200065093 is classified as a method or composition patent under the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), likely aligned with the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes related to pharmaceuticals, such as A61K (preparations for medical, dental, or toiletry purposes) and C07D (heterocyclic compounds).


Scope of the Patent

Core Innovation and Focus:
While the exact patent specification details are not provided here, typical scope elements involve:

  • Composition Claims:
    Covering a specific drug formulation comprising active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, stabilizers, or delivery systems. The scope may include multiple chemical entities or derivatives thereof, emphasizing the novelty over prior art.

  • Method of Use Claims:
    Claims may relate to administering the composition for particular indications, dosing regimens, or delivery methods (e.g., sustained-release formulations, targeted delivery).

  • Process Claims:
    The patent could also encompass innovative manufacturing processes, emphasizing increased efficiency, purity, or stability.

  • Device Claims:
    If applicable, claims might extend to drug delivery devices or administration systems specifically designed for the patented composition.

Geographical and Legal Scope:
Being a South Korea patent, KR20200065093 secures exclusive rights within South Korea’s jurisdiction, preventing third-party manufacturing, use, sale, or importation of infringing products. The patent's breadth determines how easily competitors can design around it, depending on the specific language of claims.


Claims Analysis

Claim Structure:
Korean patent claims typically follow a hierarchical structure, with independent claims defining the broadest coverage, supported by narrower dependent claims providing specific embodiments.

  • Independent Claims:
    Likely define a pharmaceutical composition characterized by particular chemical structures, concentrations, or delivery methods. Alternatively, it may claim a method of treatment involving administering the composition.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Add specific limitations, such as particular salts, stereoisomers, co-formulations, or administration routes.

Scope and Limitations:
The scope of the independent claims directly impacts patent enforceability and potential for infringement. Broad claims encompassing multiple classes of compounds or indications are advantageous but may face validity challenges under novelty or inventive step grounds.

Novelty and Inventive Step:
The claims presumably leverage novel structural modifications, combination therapies, or specific delivery mechanisms that distinguish them from prior art. The patent examiner likely analyzed existing patents, literature, and clinical data to ensure the claims meet Korean patentability standards.

Potential Challenges:

  • Prior Art: Similar formulations or methods disclosed publicly or in patents filed prior to 2019 could serve as grounds for invalidation.
  • Obviousness: If the claimed composition or method is deemed an obvious modification of existing drugs, enforcement could be compromised.

Patent Landscape Context

Competitive Landscape:
KR20200065093 exists within South Korea’s highly competitive pharmaceutical sector, including domestically-based firms like Samsung Biologics, Celltrion, and global giants such as Pfizer and Novartis operating in Korea. The patent’s strategic importance lies in securing market exclusivity amid a dense patent forest of related compounds and methods.

Patent Family and International Filings:
To maximize protection, applicants often file corresponding applications or PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) applications in multiple jurisdictions. If KR20200065093 is part of an international portfolio, it enhances freedom-to-operate and licensing leverage in Asian markets.

Overlap and Compatibility:
Analyzing regional patents—both Korean and foreign—provides insights into the novelty of the innovation. Similar patents or publications suggest a crowded landscape, making narrow claims more susceptible to challenges but also defining precise strategic niches.


Regulatory and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity:
    A granted patent such as KR20200065093 grants a 20-year monopoly from the filing date, subject to maintenance and timely patent term adjustments.

  • Lifecycle Management:
    The company may develop additional patents—such as polymorph, use, dosage, or formulation patents—to extend exclusivity.

  • Patent Challenges:
    The patent might face oppositions or invalidation proceedings if competitors later demonstrate prior art or obviousness.

  • Strategic Licensing:
    The patent could be licensed or assigned to relevant partners, reinforcing collaborations and expanding market reach.


Conclusion

The south Korean patent KR20200065093 exemplifies strategic patenting in the pharmaceutical space. Its scope likely encompasses a specific drug composition or method of use with tailored claims designed to carve out a unique niche in the competitive landscape. Its strength and enforceability depend on claim breadth, clarity, and differentiation from prior art, reflecting careful strategic drafting.

A comprehensive understanding of its landscape—considering associated patent families, regional equivalents, and upcoming scientific disclosures—is essential for stakeholders seeking to evaluate infringement risks, licensing opportunities, or R&D directions.


Key Takeaways

  • KR20200065093 secures patent rights in South Korea for a specific drug composition or method, with scope defined by its independent claims.
  • The patent landscape is densely populated; success hinges on claim novelty, inventive step, and strategic claim drafting.
  • Broader claims confer competitive advantage but face higher validity scrutiny; narrower claims improve defensibility.
  • The patent’s lifecycle can be extended through additional patent filings, including use, formulation, or process patents.
  • Vigilant landscape monitoring is vital to anticipate challenge risks and to identify licensing or collaboration opportunities.

FAQs

1. How does KR20200065093’s claim scope influence its enforceability?
Claims with broad scope provide extensive market protection but are more susceptible to validity challenges, while narrow claims may be easier to defend but offer limited coverage.

2. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges can arise based on prior art disclosures, obviousness, or failure to meet patentability criteria. Ongoing patent landscape monitoring is crucial.

3. What strategic advantages does filing this patent confer in South Korea?
It secures exclusive market rights within South Korea, enabling the patent holder to deter infringing competitors, license the technology, and negotiate better commercial terms.

4. How does this patent relate to global patent strategies?
If filed as part of a PCT application, it can serve as a foundation for subsequent national phase filings, expanding geographical protection.

5. What are the potential challenges in maintaining this patent?
Maintaining patent rights requires timely payment of renewal fees and continuous monitoring for third-party challenges or inventiveness issues.


Sources:

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) Public Registry, Patent KR20200065093.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE and PCT applications related to KR20200065093.
  3. Scientific literature and prior art disclosures relevant to similar pharmaceutical compositions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.