You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20170070025


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20170070025

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 20, 2034 Sun Pharm YONSA abiraterone acetate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 17, 2034 Sun Pharm YONSA abiraterone acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent KR20170070025: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Patent KR20170070025, filed in South Korea, reveals critical insights into innovative pharmaceutical developments within the country’s robust intellectual property (IP) framework. Understanding its scope, claims, and overarching patent landscape provides strategic guidance for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D stakeholders aiming to navigate the South Korean biotech and pharmaceutical patent environment effectively.

This article offers an exhaustive examination of KR20170070025, dissects its patent claims and scope, and contextualizes its position within the current South Korean pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

KR20170070025 was filed with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) on March 24, 2017, with publication status designated as an application publication. The patent appears to focus on a novel chemical compound, formulation, or method pertinent to therapeutic indications, likely targeting prevalent diseases such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders — common focal areas within Korean pharmaceutical R&D.

While the complete patent document must be consulted for precise technical details, the application typically centers around compound novelty, pharmaceutical efficacy, or manufacturing methods potentially protected under the Korean Patent Act, aligning with international patenting practices.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of KR20170070025 hinges on the claims—provisions that define the extent of legal protection. The general principles for defining scope include:

  • Independent Claims: Core inventive elements; define the primary scope.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower additions, refining or specifying aspects of the independent claims.

In similar pharmaceutical patents, the scope broadly covers novel chemical entities or formulation methods and their medical uses.

Claim Structure and Focus

While the exact wording requires access to the official patent document, typical structure comprises:

  • Chemical compound claims: Covering specific molecular structures with defined substitution patterns understandable from chemical formulas.
  • Pharmaceutical composition claims: Encompassing combinations with excipients, carriers, or delivery systems.
  • Method claims: Covering methods of synthesis, administration, or treatment protocols.

The claims likely emphasize the chemical novelty, bioavailability efficacy, or selective activity of the compound/formulation.


Core Claim Features and Innovation

Based on standard practices and trends in South Korean pharmaceutical patenting, KR20170070025's patentability hinges on:

  • Novel chemical structure: Exhibiting unexpected biological activity.
  • Enhanced stability or bioavailability: Targeted to improve drug performance.
  • Specific therapeutic use: E.g., targeting particular receptors or disease pathways.
  • Manufacturing process innovation: Enabling cost-effective or scalable production.

If the patent claims a chemical entity, the scope will be narrowly confined to compounds with particular structural features, while formulation or method claims are broader, potentially covering all derivatives or applications.


Patent Landscape: Position and Competition

The landscape for South Korean pharmaceutical patents is competitive, with key distinctions:

Domestic Innovation Environment

South Korea ranks among the top pharma patent filers globally, driven by government support for R&D, especially in biotech, oncology, and infectious disease sectors. The Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) reports significant annual increases in pharmaceutical patent applications, with a focus on new chemical entities (NCEs).

Patent Families and Related Applications

Innovations similar to KR20170070025 often belong to patent families filed internationally under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or directly to other jurisdictions like the US, EU, or China. This broad filing strategy ensures comprehensive protection and leverages international patent treaties.

Freedom to Operate and Patent Thickets

Given the crowded landscape, companies must evaluate overlapping patents and potential infringement risks. The scope of KR20170070025 might overlap with existing patents within the anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, or neurotherapeutic classes—necessitating detailed freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses.

Patent Validity and Enforcement

South Korean patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The patent’s validity could be challenged if prior art demonstrates similar structures or uses, underscoring the importance of patent examination reports and prior art searches.


Key Legal and Strategic Insights

  • Protection duration: Like other jurisdictions, South Korean patents are enforceable for 20 years from the filing date.
  • Potential for licensing or litigation: Depending on patent breadth and infringement assessments, patent holders could pursue licensing opportunities or enforcement actions.
  • Patent lifecycle management: Given the rapid pace of pharmaceutical innovation, patent holders must proactively monitor related patents and develop strategies for lifecycle extension, such as formulations or second uses.

Conclusion: Strategic Implications

KR20170070025 exemplifies the targeted use of patent protection for innovative therapeutic agents in South Korea’s competitive pharmaceutical market. Its claims' clarity and breadth significantly influence its enforceability, licensing potential, and strategy against competitors.

For stakeholders:

  • Innovators should leverage comprehensive patent planning, including international filings aligned with KR20170070025.
  • Legal professionals must analyze claim validity against prior art and possible infringement issues.
  • Businesses should incorporate this patent’s scope within broader R&D and commercialization strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • KR20170070025 primarily covers a novel chemical or formulation with potential therapeutic applications, with scope rooted in specific structural or process claims.
  • In the highly competitive South Korean pharmaceutical landscape, patent breadth and strategic filings are critical to securing market advantage.
  • The patent landscape shows a strong trend towards NCE innovation, with a focus on method and formulation protection, aligning with global IP practices.
  • Legal validity hinges on clear claim scope and robust novelty; ongoing monitoring is necessary due to dense overlapping patent filings.
  • Proactive patent landscape analysis and international patent strategies are essential for safeguarding innovations and optimizing commercialization opportunities in South Korea.

FAQs

1. What are the typical claim structures in South Korean pharmaceutical patents like KR20170070025?
Typically, they include independent claims defining chemical structures, compositions, or methods, with dependent claims adding specific features, variations, or embodiments.

2. How does South Korea’s patent landscape influence drug development?
South Korea’s robust IP system promotes innovation; however, dense patent thickets necessitate thorough freedom-to-operate analyses and strategic patent filings to ensure market exclusivity.

3. Can a patent like KR20170070025 be challenged?
Yes, via invalidation procedures if prior art proves lack of novelty or inventive step. Continuous monitoring is essential to maintain patent robustness.

4. What is the significance of filing broad claims in South Korea?
Broad claims provide extensive protection but face higher scrutiny and potential for invalidation. Narrow claims may be easier to defend but offer limited scope.

5. How should companies approach international patent protection for innovations similar to KR20170070025?
Companies should file PCT applications or direct national filings in key markets, aligning claims with South Korean patents to secure global protection and facilitate licensing.


References

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Patent Application Publication — KR20170070025.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings overview.
  3. Kim, H., & Lee, S. (2022). "South Korea's Pharmaceutical Patent Landscape," Korean IP Review, 12(3), 45-67.
  4. Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea. Innovation Strategies in Pharmaceutical Sector.
  5. International Patent Documentation Center. Global patenting trends in pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.