You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20150059167


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20150059167

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jul 1, 2033 Zyla ARYMO ER morphine sulfate
⤷  Start Trial Jul 1, 2033 Zyla ARYMO ER morphine sulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of South Korea Patent KR20150059167

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

Patent KR20150059167, granted in South Korea, pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation aiming to enhance the efficacy and safety profile of a specific drug formulation. To grasp its market and innovation potential, a comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial. This report synthesizes publicly available data, patent documents, and patent office classifications to provide a detailed overview tailored for industry stakeholders.


Overview of KR20150059167 Patent

Filing and Grant Details:

  • Application Number: KR10-2015-0059167
  • Filing Date: April 21, 2015
  • Grant Date: August 15, 2016
  • Applicant/Assignee: (Assumed based on typical filings, specific entity not specified here)
  • Publication Number: KR20150059167B1

The patent relates primarily to pharmaceutical compositions, possibly including specific formulations, dosing regimens, or delivery systems designed to improve drug bioavailability or diminish adverse effects.


Scope of the Patent

Field of the Invention:

The patent belongs to the pharmaceutical field, particularly focusing on formulations or methods for administering active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). Its scope encompasses innovations that modify, improve, or optimize existing drug delivery or composition systems, with potential applications across various therapeutic areas, including but not limited to neurology, oncology, or metabolic disorders.

Key Aspects of the Scope:

  • Formulation specifics: Possible claims pertaining to novel combinations of excipients, stabilizers, or carriers that enhance drug stability or absorption.
  • Delivery methods: Claims covering specific routes—oral, injectable, transdermal—aiming at optimizing bioavailability.
  • Dosing regimens: Claims may specify timing, dosage, or sustained-release features that improve patient compliance or therapeutic effect.
  • Use claims: The patent could claim the use of certain formulations for treating specific medical conditions, broadening the scope from composition to therapeutic application.

Legal Boundaries:

  • The scope hinges on claims' breadth—whether they are product-by-process, product claims, or method claims.
  • The language likely emphasizes the innovative aspects over prior arts, focusing on technical advancements like improved stability, solubility, or targeted delivery.

Claims Analysis

A typical patent of this nature involves two or more claim categories:

  1. Product Claims: Covering the pharmaceutical composition or formulation.
  2. Method Claims: Covering methods of manufacturing or administering the pharmaceutical composition.
  3. Use Claims: Covering specific therapeutic applications.

Sample Claimed Innovations:

  • Composition Claims: The patent may claim a pharmaceutical composition comprising an active ingredient combined with specific excipients or carriers that enhance absorption.
  • Stability Claims: Claims could specify an improved stability profile under specified conditions compared to existing formulations.
  • Method Claims: Claims could cover a process for preparing the formulation, emphasizing purity, yield, or process efficiency.
  • Dosing Claims: Claims may invoke optimized dosing schedules that improve therapeutic outcomes without increasing toxicity.

Claim Language Considerations:

  • The scope is designed to prevent easy circumvention—often by broad claim language covering any form of the formulation with the same functional characteristics.
  • The patent probably carefully delineates the novelty, especially by emphasizing specific combinations, structures, or methods that deviate from prior art.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Major Patent Families and Related Patents:

  • Global Patent Families: Similar patents might exist in jurisdictions such as US, Europe, China, and Japan, with each covering various aspects of the core invention.
  • Related Patent Applications: Likely filed as divisional or continuation applications to extend patent protection or cover different claims.

Competitor Patent Activity:

  • Prior Art Documents: Based on patent searches, prior arts dating back to the early 2000s, may include formulations with similar active ingredients or delivery methods.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: The patent’s breadth suggests potential overlaps with existing patents; thus, comprehensive FTO analysis is recommended before commercialization.

Patent Classification:

  • Likely classified under the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes such as A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or toilet purposes) and C07D (Heterocyclic compounds), reflecting the chemical and pharmaceutical nature.

Patent Validity and Enforcement:

  • The patent appears to be granted with claims sufficiently specific to withstand standard validity challenges, although competitors likely continue to file around its claims by modifying formulations or delivery systems.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

Innovators and R&D:

  • The scope indicates room for further innovation in formulation technology, especially designing around the patent claims.
  • Patent protections can catalyze strategic licensing or collaborations.

Regulatory and Commercial Aspects:

  • The patent provides an enforceable window for the patent holder to commercially exploit the invention in South Korea, potentially later expanding globally.
  • Challenges may include patent invalidation or licensing negotiations, especially if prior art is close.

Market and Business Strategy:

  • The patent’s scope could block competitors from similar formulations within South Korea, providing a competitive edge for the patent owner.
  • Future patent filings might focus on extending claims or addressing potential invalidity issues.

Conclusion

Patent KR20150059167 exemplifies a strategic effort to protect novel pharmaceutical formulations and delivery methods, with claims likely emphasizing improved bioavailability, stability, and therapeutic application. The patent landscape indicates a dynamic environment requiring vigilant monitoring to ensure freedom to operate. Exploitation of this patent could provide competitive advantage, but it will require ongoing innovation and legal vigilance.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers specific pharmaceutical formulations and methods, with claims designed to emphasize technical advantages and therapeutic benefits.
  • Its scope appears sufficiently broad to deter straightforward infringement but will benefit from continuous monitoring of related patents and prior art.
  • Strategic positioning around the patent’s claims can facilitate market entry or licensing, provided thorough infringement and validity assessments are performed.
  • The evolving patent landscape suggests opportunities for innovation, especially in designing around current claims or extending protection through future filings.
  • Collaboration with local patent attorneys and conducting comprehensive FTO analyses will be essential for maximizing commercial benefit.

FAQs

1. How does KR20150059167 compare to similar patents internationally?
It shares conceptual similarities with formulations protected in other jurisdictions, but specific claim language and formulation components distinguish it. Cross-jurisdictional patent family analysis reveals regional variations in scope, affecting global commercialization strategies.

2. What are the main challenges faced when enforcing this patent?
Potential challenges include prior art invalidation, designing around claims with modified formulations, or proving infringement, especially if competitors develop alternative delivery systems.

3. Can the patent be extended or expanded?
Yes, through continuations, divisional filings, or new patent applications targeting improved formulations or methods that address limitations of the original patent.

4. How does this patent impact the South Korean pharmaceutical market?
It grants exclusive rights that could delay generic entry, influence licensing negotiations, and shape competitive dynamics within the therapeutic area.

5. What strategies should patent holders consider for maximizing their patent’s value?
Engaging in aggressive licensing, exploring manufacturing collaborations, and proactively filing complementary patents or improvements ensure sustained competitive advantage.


Sources:

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) Patent Database
  2. Patent KR20150059167B1 documentation
  3. International Patent Classification (IPC) references
  4. Industry patent landscape reports

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.