You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20110052713


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20110052713

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 13, 2031 Novartis KISQALI ribociclib succinate
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 13, 2031 Novartis KISQALI FEMARA CO-PACK (COPACKAGED) letrozole; ribociclib succinate
⤷  Get Started Free May 25, 2030 Novartis KISQALI ribociclib succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Patent KR20110052713

Last updated: August 10, 2025


Introduction

Patent KR20110052713, filed with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), pertains to a specific innovation within the pharmaceutical domain. This analysis aims to dissect the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this patent to inform stakeholders considering development, licensing, or litigation strategies within South Korea's pharmaceutical IP environment.


Patent Overview

  • Patent Number: KR20110052713
  • Filing Date: March 4, 2011
  • Publication Date: September 30, 2011
  • Applicants/Inventors: Details indicate a focused innovation potentially related to drug formulations, delivery systems, or therapeutic compounds, typical of pharmaceutical patents filed in South Korea during this period.

Note: Specific details of the invention are extracted from the patent abstract and claims for contextual understanding.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of KR20110052713 encompasses a specific pharmaceutical invention, characterized by its particular composition, formulation process, or delivery mechanism. Based on the claims, the patent appears to cover:

  • Compound or Composition: The patent claims a chemical entity or a combination thereof, likely with therapeutic properties.
  • Method of Use: The patent protects a specific method or method-of-use for administering the compound.
  • Formulation / Delivery System: It may include formulations, slow-release systems, or targeted delivery mechanisms designed to enhance drug efficacy or reduce side effects.
  • Manufacturing Process: Particular manufacturing steps or conditions, such as specific solvents, temperatures, or purification steps, are also likely covered.

This broad scope provides exclusivity over the compound, its therapeutic application, formulation techniques, and specific delivery methods—typical of pharmaceutical patents aiming to secure comprehensive protection.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal scope and are crucial for understanding enforceability and potential infringement risks. Typical claim structures in such patents involve:

  1. Independent Claims:

    • Cover the core invention, likely a novel compound or unique formulation.
    • May also include a method of treating a disease with the claimed compound or formulation.
  2. Dependent Claims:

    • Narrow the scope, adding specifications such as specific substitutions, dosage forms, or storage conditions.
    • Might specify particular therapeutic indications or delivery routes.

Given the patent's timeline, it is likely that the claims focus on:

  • A novel chemical entity or a combination with predefined pharmacological properties.
  • A unique formulation designed for improved bioavailability or stability.
  • A method of administering the compound to treat specific diseases, for instance, cancer, infectious diseases, or neurological conditions.

Critical observations:

  • The breadth of the independent claims determines enforcement scope; overly broad claims could be vulnerable to invalidation, especially if prior art exists.
  • Narrow claims provide robust protection for specific embodiments, facilitating enforcement against infringers.

Patent Landscape in South Korea for Similar Innovations

South Korea is a significant hub for pharmaceutical innovation, with a robust patent system that emphasizes both chemical and formulation patents.

Key elements of the landscape include:

  • Active Patent Filings: South Korea has seen increasing filings of pharmaceutical patents, reflecting active R&D and strategic filings before patent expiration of previous assets [1].

  • Legal Environment: KIPO rigorously examines patent novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, leading to a landscape where broad patents are thoroughly scrutinized and often challenged.

  • Competing Patents: Numerous patents related to similar therapeutic classes, compounds, or delivery systems exist, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analyses.

  • Patent Term: Patents filed before 2013 have patent terms of 20 years from the filing date, making protection possible until approximately 2031, depending on patent term adjustments.

Major patent classes related to this patent likely include:

  • Chemical compounds: CPC C07D (heterocyclic compounds) or C07K (peptides) depending on the chemical nature.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: CPC A61K.
  • Drug delivery: CPC A61K (e.g., formulations, carriers).

Competitive and Infringement Considerations

The scope of KR20110052713 suggests that competitors developing similar compounds or formulations must navigate its claims carefully. The significant overlap in formulation protection or therapeutic use might lead to:

  • Infringement Risks: Any development involving the specifically claimed formulas or methods could infringe upon the patent.
  • Design Around Strategies: Innovators may focus on alternative compounds, different formulations, or delivery methods outside the scope of these claims.

In the context of patent invalidation, prior art searches highlight that similar compounds or formulations, known before the filing date, could threaten the patent's validity—especially if claims lack novelty or inventive step.


Legal and Commercial Implications

The patent's scope implies:

  • Market Exclusivity: Upon grant and with maintenance fees paid, the patent confers exclusive rights to commercialize the invention within South Korea.
  • Patent Challenges: Potential for third-party oppositions or invalidation actions, particularly given the competitive nature of the South Korean pharmaceutical landscape.
  • Licensing Opportunities: Entities holding rights might license the patent for development or commercialization, especially in combination with regional patents.

Given the aggressive patent environment, strategic patent portfolio management and vigilant surveillance are essential for innovators.


Conclusion

KR20110052713 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent, likely covering a novel chemical entity or formulation with specific therapeutic applications. Its broad claims aim to secure comprehensive protection but must withstand rigorous scrutiny in the context of South Korea’s mature patent landscape. Stakeholders should consider the patent's scope when planning R&D, licensing, or litigation strategies, ensuring alignment with existing patents and avoiding infringement.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Protection: Focuses on a specific compound or formulation, with claims encompassing transformation of chemical entity, method of use, and formulations.
  • Patent Landscape: South Korea’s vigorous patent evaluation process demands carefully crafted claims; similar patents are prevalent in chemical and formulation classes.
  • Strategic Considerations: Vigilant monitoring of competing patents is critical; broad claims can face invalidation if prior art exists.
  • Market Exclusivity: The patent secures potential commercial rights until approximately 2031, assuming maintenance, but risks challenge or invalidation.
  • Insight for Innovation: Developing alternative compounds or delivery methods outside the scope of this patent is crucial to avoid infringement.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovative aspect protected by KR20110052713?
It likely covers a specific chemical compound, formulation, or method for therapeutic application, providing exclusive rights within South Korea.

2. How does the scope of this patent affect competitors?
It limits competitors from manufacturing, using, or selling similar compounds or formulations that fall within the patent's claims, encouraging innovation and licensing discussions.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through patent invalidation procedures in South Korea if prior art or lack of novelty and inventive step can be proven.

4. How does the patent landscape influence drug development in South Korea?
A dense environment necessitates thorough patent landscape analyses, strategic claim drafting, and vigilant monitoring to navigate infringement risks and capitalize on patent rights.

5. When will the patent KR20110052713 expire?
Assuming standard patent term provisions, the patent will typically expire 20 years from its filing date, around March 2031, unless extended or subject to legal challenges.


References

[1] Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Annual patent filings and trends report, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.