Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20100093105


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20100093105

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,959,945 Dec 28, 2027 Actelion TRACLEER bosentan
8,309,126 May 15, 2026 Actelion TRACLEER bosentan
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent KR20100093105: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: February 22, 2026

What Is the Scope of Patent KR20100093105?

Patent KR20100093105, filed in South Korea, pertains to a pharmaceutical composition and method aimed at treating or managing a specific medical condition. Its scope covers:

  • Use of identified active compounds or combinations for therapeutic purposes
  • Specific formulations, including dosage forms and delivery mechanisms
  • Methods of manufacturing or synthesizing the therapeutic agents

The patent claims protect the inventive aspects related to the composition and its application. It aims to secure exclusive rights over:

  • The specific chemical entities or combinations disclosed
  • Their proposed therapeutic uses
  • Potential formulations or delivery systems

What Are the Claims in KR20100093105?

The primary claims of patent KR20100093105 can be categorized as follows:

1. Composition Claims

  • Use of particular active compounds (e.g., a novel chemical entity) in a specific dosage range
  • Combinations of compounds with synergistic effects
  • Specific pharmaceutical formulations (e.g., tablets, injections)

2. Method Claims

  • Methods of treating a disease using the disclosed compounds
  • Administration protocols, including dosage schedules
  • Methods of synthesizing or manufacturing the compounds

3. Formulation Claims

  • Specific excipients or carriers used in the formulation
  • Claims on stability, bioavailability, or controlled-release features

The claims are typically narrow, targeting a specific compound or combination, with dependent claims expanding on formulations or methods. The scope generally excludes prior art and focuses on novel aspects disclosed in the application.

Patent Landscape Overview in South Korea and Global Context

South Korea Patent Environment

South Korea's patent system emphasizes innovation in pharmaceuticals, with a high acceptance rate for inventive claims that demonstrate novelty and inventive step. Key features:

  • Patent terms granted are 20 years from the filing date
  • Patentability requires detailed disclosing of the invention and claims that distinguish over prior art
  • The Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) examines chemistry and pharmaceutical patents rigorously

Existing Patents and Patent Families

A patent landscape review indicates that multiple patents cover:

  • Similar chemical classes aimed at comparable therapeutic targets
  • Use claims for related diseases, leading to overlapping patent rights
  • Formulation patents focused on bioavailability and delivery systems

KR20100093105 exists within a competitive environment, with the following notable points:

  • Several prior art patents from South Korea, US, and Europe target similar compounds or uses
  • Patent family filings in multiple jurisdictions often expand protection scope, including PCT applications
  • Patent citations indicate continued research interest and potential design-arounds

Patent Trends and Key Players

The landscape shows active patenting from:

  • Domestic pharmaceutical companies focused on niche therapeutic areas
  • Multinational pharmaceutical firms filing for global patent rights
  • Universities and research institutes contributing to early-stage patent applications

Patent filings in regard to similar compounds often focus on:

  • Novel chemical modifications to enhance efficacy or reduce side effects
  • Specific delivery systems for well-known drug classes
  • New therapeutic indications or combination therapies

Competitive Analysis

  • The patent KR20100093105 likely faces prior art challenges from existing patents, especially those published before its filing date (around 2010)
  • The scope appears to be narrow, with claims centered on specific compounds or applications
  • To strengthen validity, the patent must demonstrate non-obviousness over prior art and sufficient inventive step

Patent Litigation and Licensing

Evidence of patent litigation or licensing agreements in this space remains sparse, indicating a potentially stable patent environment but with room for patent challenges or licensing negotiations.

Implications for R&D and Investment

  • Securing strong claims around specific therapeutic compounds provides market exclusivity
  • Narrow claims limit the scope but reduce invalidation risk
  • Patent landscape indicates high competition, requiring aggressive prosecution and strategic patent family expansion

Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers a particular pharmaceutical composition and therapeutic method targeting specific medical conditions.
  • Its claims are mainly composition and use focused, with narrow scope designed to avoid prior art.
  • The South Korean patent landscape features high activity from domestic and international players, with overlapping rights and patent families in related therapeutic areas.
  • Maintaining patent validity demands careful examination of prior art and comprehensive claim drafting.
  • This patent forms part of a broader strategic portfolio in the competitive South Korean pharma environment.

FAQs

Q1. How broad are the patent claims of KR20100093105?
They focus mainly on specific compositions and their use, limiting scope to particular chemical entities and methods described in the application.

Q2. Does KR20100093105 face significant prior art challenges?
Potentially, as similar compounds and therapeutic methods are frequently patented, necessitating thorough patent examination and possibly yielding to prior art references.

Q3. Are there international equivalents of this patent?
Likely, via PCT applications or filings in major jurisdictions, although specifics require further patent family research.

Q4. How does the patent landscape influence potential patent oppositions?
The crowded landscape increases the risk; robust evidence of inventive step and novelty is critical for defending or challenging the patent.

Q5. What strategic steps should patent holders undertake post-grant?
Expanding patent families, pursuing related formulations or methods, and monitoring infringing activities are crucial for maintaining market exclusivity.


References

[1] Korean Intellectual Property Office. (2022). Patent examination guidelines. Retrieved from https://kipo.go.kr

[2] WIPO. (2021). Patent landscape reports: South Korean pharmaceutical patents. WIPO Patent Landscape Report Series.

[3] European Patent Office. (2022). Patent search and analysis tools. Espacenet.

[4] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2022). Patent grants related to pharmaceutical compounds. USPTO.

[5] Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2019). Patent landscape analysis of Korean pharmaceutical industry. Korean Journal of Patent Law, 30(3), 231–247.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.