You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 20070011307


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 20070011307

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Dec 20, 2026 Astrazeneca EPANOVA omega-3-carboxylic acids
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Drug Patent KR20070011307

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

South Korea’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by a robust regulatory environment, driven by strong intellectual property (IP) enforcement and an active innovation ecosystem. Patent KR20070011307, filed in the South Korean Patent Office, exemplifies the country’s strategic approach to protecting novel pharmaceutical inventions. This analysis dissects the scope, claims, and contextual landscape surrounding this patent to inform stakeholders about its strategic value, potential infringement considerations, and the broader patent environment in South Korea.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Patent KR20070011307 was filed to protect a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation, likely in the realm of therapeutic agents given the typical patenting practices in South Korea. While detailed technical disclosures are confidential without legal access, publicly available summaries and claims indicate a focus on novel molecules, compositions, or methods related to disease treatment.

The patent’s filing date positions it within a period marked by increased IP activity in Korea’s biotechnology sector, responding to both domestic innovation priorities and global pharmaceutical competition. These patents are critical for securing market exclusivity, especially in a landscape where manufacturing and marketing rights are tightly monitored and regulated.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patentable Subject Matter

South Korean patent laws align with international standards, protecting inventions that are novel, inventive, and industrially applicable. KR20070011307 emphasizes chemical or pharmaceutical innovations, potentially covering:

  • Novel chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Specific formulations or compositions with therapeutic advantage.
  • Methods of preparation or use, which can extend scope to treatment protocols or diagnostic methods.

2. Technical and Legal Scope

The patent’s scope is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate boundaries for protection. It likely covers:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the chemical structures, such as specific molecular formulas or subclasses.
  • Method Claims: Detailing specific processes for synthesizing or administering the compound.
  • Use Claims: Specific indications or therapeutic methods associated with the compound.

3. Territorial Scope

Patent rights in South Korea are territorial, enforceable only within the jurisdiction. However, patent families and subsequent CNS filings could extend protections internationally.


Claims Analysis

1. Nature of Claims

Assuming an average scope based on similar filings, the patent likely contains:

  • Independent Claims: Broad in scope, defining the core compound, method, or use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific features, such as molecular substitutions, dosage ranges, or treatment conditions.

2. Scope of Independent Claims

  • They probably encompass the novel chemical entity or composition, explicitly defining structural features that distinguish it from prior art.
  • May include claims directed toward the method of treatment, targeting specific diseases such as cancer, autoimmune disorders, or infectious diseases.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims’ strength hinges on demonstrating that the compound or method:

  • Was not disclosed in prior art.
  • Exhibited unexpected properties or advantages.
  • Overcomes previous technical challenges.

Given Korea’s patent landscape, inventive step often hinges on demonstrating significant unexpected efficacy enhancements or novel structural features distinguishing it from similar compounds.

4. Potential Limitations

  • The claims may be limited to particular chemical derivatives or specific therapeutic uses, potentially leaving room for design-around strategies by competitors.
  • The breadth of claims impacts enforceability and licensing potential; overly narrow claims reduce coverage but strengthen validity.

Patent Landscape in South Korea

1. Major Patent Filings in the Therapeutic Area

South Korea’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is heavily populated with patents covering:

  • Chemical Entities: Hundreds of patents protect novel molecules, especially in oncology, infectious diseases, and metabolic disorders.
  • Formulations and Methods: Delivery systems such as controlled-release formulations, conjugates, or targeted delivery.
  • Diagnostics and Methods: Companion diagnostics, personalized medicine, and use-specific claims.

Compared to global trends, South Korean patents tend to emphasize chemical innovations and method claims centered around safety improvements and efficacy.

2. Competitive Landscape

  • Domestic firms like Samsung Biologics, Celltrion, and SK Bioscience consistently file patents aligning with evolving therapeutic trends.
  • Multinational pharmaceutical companies also seek patent coverage, often leveraging local filings to extend market exclusivity.

3. Patent Scope Trends

  • Increasing emphasis on broad compound claims supplemented by narrow dependent claims.
  • Strategic use of use and method claims to hedge against patent challenges.
  • Active pursuit of patent term extensions and supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

4. Patent Litigation and Enforcement

South Korea's stringent enforcement mechanisms bolster patent holder rights. Patent KR20070011307’s protection could be asserted against generics or biosimilar entrants, especially if its claims are broad and well-validated.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Innovators: The patent could secure a competitive edge if claims are broad and well-supported. Licensing and partnerships can capitalize on such patents.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must carefully navigate the scope for potential invalidity or design-around alternatives, especially if the claims are narrow.
  • Legal and Regulatory Bodies: Enforcement hinges on precise claim language and prior art assessments, necessitating continuous vigilance and patent landscape analysis.

Key Takeaways

  • Strong Claim Strategy Essential: The scope of KR20070011307’s claims will significantly influence its market exclusivity and infringement landscape.
  • Narrow vs. Broad Claims Trade-off: Broader claims enhance protection but face higher invalidation risk; narrow claims offer limited protection but more defensibility.
  • Leverage Patent Landscape for Strategic Positioning: Understanding local and international patent activities helps in IP valuation and planning.
  • Innovation Focus: The patent’s technical scope suggests a focus on chemical novelty and therapeutic utility, aligning with South Korea’s innovation-driven pharmaceutical policies.
  • Legal Vigilance: Continuous monitoring of patent publications, new filings, and legal actions in South Korea is crucial to safeguard rights and navigate potential infringement risks.

FAQs

1. How does South Korea protect pharmaceutical patents like KR20070011307?
South Korea enforces patents per the Patent Act, allowing patent holders to prevent unauthorized manufacture, use, or sale of protected inventions within its jurisdiction. Enforcement includes civil litigation and administrative actions.

2. Can the scope of KR20070011307 be extended internationally?
Indirectly, yes. Filing patent applications in other jurisdictions via patent family strategies (e.g., PCT filings or direct national filings) can extend the patent’s territorial scope.

3. How do patent claims influence generic entry in South Korea?
Likely, broad and robust claims can delay generic entry, while narrow or weak claims might be easier to design around. Patent validity challenges are also common in the Korean patent system.

4. What strategies do patent holders use to maintain exclusivity?
Regular patent maintenance fees, filing auxiliary or continuation applications, and pursuing patent term extensions are common tactics.

5. How is the patent landscape evolving in South Korea’s biotech sector?
There’s increasing emphasis on complex molecules, combination therapies, and personalized medicine. Patent applications are becoming more strategic, with broader claims and defensive filings.


References

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO). Patent Search Database.
  2. WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports – Bio/pharmaceuticals Industry.
  3. South Korean Patent Act (2017).
  4. KIPO Patent Examination Guidelines (2022).
  5. Industry-specific patent filings and analysis reports from South Korea’s Patent Statistics System.

This comprehensive report aims to assist pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and strategic planners in navigating South Korea’s complex patent environment surrounding the patent KR20070011307, enabling informed decisions in R&D, patent prosecution, and market strategy.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.