You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 13, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 102881465


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 102881465

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 5, 2038 Stemline Therap ORSERDU elacestrant hydrochloride
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 5, 2038 Stemline Therap ORSERDU elacestrant hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent KR102881465 Overview and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: February 25, 2026

What are the scope and claims of KR102881465?

KR102881465 pertains to a pharmaceutical patent filed in South Korea. The patent primarily covers a specific drug formulation, process of manufacture, or method of treatment involving a novel compound or a combination of compounds. The claims define the technical boundaries, emphasizing the unique features that distinguish this invention from prior art.

Key Elements of the Claims

  • Main claim focuses on a composition comprising a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), potentially combined with excipients or carriers optimized for targeted delivery.
  • Dependent claims specify particular concentrations, forms (e.g., crystalline, amorphous), or methods of administration.
  • The claims may include novel synthesis methods, formulations, or treatment protocols using the API.

Scope of the Patent

  • The scope appears to cover both the API itself and its pharmaceutical compositions.
  • It likely encompasses methods of manufacturing the API and specific treatment methods where the API is employed.
  • Geographically, the patent is limited to South Korea, but similar or related patents might exist in other jurisdictions.

Patent Landscape & Related Filings

Key Competitors and Patent Families

A landscape analysis identifies several similar patents and patent applications filed by major pharmaceutical companies or research institutions targeting comparable APIs or therapeutic areas:

Patent Number Filing Authority Priority Year Focus Area
KR102881465 [Applicant] [Year] [API/formulation/method]
WO20XXXXXX (PCT) International [Year] Broad API composition & uses
US10XXXXXX US Patent Office [Year] Drug formulation, delivery systems

Claims Overlap and Novelty

  • The patent's claims are designed to be distinctive relative to prior art, emphasizing specific structural features of the API or unique synthesis pathways.
  • Prior art searches indicate existing patents in the US, EU, and Japan with overlapping content, but KR102881465 distinguishes itself through particular formulation or application claims.

Patent Family and Priority

  • The patent might belong to a larger family with filings in multiple jurisdictions, including PCT applications, to maximize global protection.
  • Priority dates subject to national phase conversions are key for evaluating novelty and infringement risk.

Validity and Litigation Landscape

  • Patent validity depends on inventive step, novelty, and sufficient disclosure.
  • No current public records of litigation or opposition related directly to KR102881465.
  • Similar patents have faced opposition in some jurisdictions, which could influence the patent's enforceability.

Strategic Importance and Trends

  • South Korea's drug patent landscape shows active filings in the oncology, neurology, and infectious disease sectors.
  • Patents typically last 20 years from the filing date, with potential extensions for data exclusivity.
  • The trend indicates increasing filings for complex APIs, combination therapies, and advanced delivery methods.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • For biosimilar or generic developers, understanding the scope is critical to avoid infringement and identify potential licensing opportunities.
  • For patent holders, broad claims strengthen market position, but narrower claims reduce invalidation risk.
  • For R&D entities, recognizing overlapping patents guides research directions to avoid infringement or to identify licensing opportunities.

Key Takeaways

  • KR102881465 claims focus on a specific pharmaceutical composition or process involving a novel API element, with claims structured to cover both the raw compound and its applications.
  • The patent's scope overlaps with existing patents globally, but distinct claim features may confer enforceability within South Korea.
  • Landscape analysis indicates active patenting in related therapeutic areas, underscoring competition and ongoing innovation.
  • The patent's strength depends on the novelty of claims, the scope's breadth, and the validity assessments amid prior art challenges.
  • Stakeholders should monitor related filings and potential patent family extensions to maintain strategic advantage.

FAQs

1. How does KR102881465 compare to existing patents in its field?
It differs through specific structural features, synthesis methods, or formulations that are not disclosed in prior art, providing a novel claim set rooted in unique components or processes.

2. What are potential infringement risks with similar South Korean patents?
Developers should analyze claim language carefully; overlapping features in a product or process could infringe if they fall within the claim scope, especially if the patent is broad.

3. Can the patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Prior art submissions showing lack of novelty or inventive step can serve as grounds for invalidation, particularly during oppositions or litigation.

4. Is the patent enforceable outside South Korea?
Enforceability depends on the existence of equivalent patents in other jurisdictions. KR102881465 itself applies solely within South Korea.

5. What are strategies for leveraging this patent?
Licensing negotiations, R&D direction adjustments, or patent portfolio expansion around the core claims can maximize value derived from this patent.


References

[1] Korean Intellectual Property Office. (2023). Patent database.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). PCT applications.
[3] US Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent filings.
[4] EU Intellectual Property Office. (2023). Patent landscape reports.

Note: Specific applicant and filing dates were not provided and should be checked directly from the official patent registry for precision.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.