You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Profile for South Korea Patent: 102707399


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 102707399

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jan 5, 2038 Stemline Therap ORSERDU elacestrant hydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial Jan 5, 2038 Stemline Therap ORSERDU elacestrant hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Drug Patent KR102707399

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

KR102707399, granted in South Korea, pertains to a pharmaceutical patent that embodies specific innovations in drug formulation, manufacturing, or therapeutic method. Patent landscapes in this country are critical for understanding competitive positioning, potential infringement risks, and licensing opportunities. This analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, and position within the broader South Korean patent environment for pharmaceuticals, aiming to support strategic decisions for industry stakeholders.


Scope of KR102707399

The patent exclusively covers a novel aspect of a drug or its manufacturing process, delineating legal boundaries essential to its enforceability. In essence, the scope defines the technical features protected, which may include:

  • Specific chemical compounds or their salts, stereoisomers, or derivatives with therapeutic efficacy.
  • Unique formulation compositions, including excipients or delivery mechanisms.
  • Innovative manufacturing processes that enhance yield, stability, or bioavailability.
  • Specific dose regimens or administration methods.

Based on South Korean patent practices, the scope is articulated primarily through the claims section. The breadth of these claims determines the patent’s enforceability against potential infringers, where broad claims afford extensive protection, and narrower claims limit potential overlaps.


Claims Analysis

The patent claims are central to understanding the patent’s legal scope. Typically, they fall into two categories: independent and dependent claims.

1. Independent Claims
These define the core inventive concept. For KR102707399, the independent claims likely specify:

  • A particular chemical entity or class of compounds with demonstrated therapeutic activity.
  • An innovative formulation method or composition that improves drug stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.
  • A labor-saving or cost-effective manufacturing process.

2. Dependent Claims
These add specific limitations or embodiments, such as:

  • Inclusion of particular excipients or stabilizers.
  • Specific dosage forms, such as tablets or injections.
  • Variations tailored for targeted patient populations.

Claim Language Strength and Validity
The scope’s enforceability depends on claim language strength, clarity, and novelty. Patent examiners evaluate whether the subject matter:

  • Is novel over prior art, including earlier patents or scientific publications.
  • Involves an inventive step, providing non-obvious advantages.
  • Is fully enabled and adequately described.

Assuming the patent holds claims for a novel pharmaceutical compound with enhanced bioavailability, the scope appears strategically valuable. However, overly broad claims risking overlap with existing patents could face validity challenges.


Patent Landscape in South Korea for Drugs Similar to KR102707399

1. Patent Families and Overlap
KR102707399 exists within a dense patent network involving domestic and international filings. Typical landscape features include:

  • Priority filings in major jurisdictions such as US, Europe, and China.
  • Patent families around similar compounds or formulations aiming to block generic manufacturing or license negotiations.
  • Similar patents from competitors offering alternative compositions or manufacturing methods.

2. Key Patent Trends
Major trends in South Korea’s pharmaceutical patent landscape include:

  • Emphasis on innovative drug delivery systems, such as controlled release, transdermal patches, or targeted delivery.
  • Focus on generics and biosimilars, necessitating careful patent clearance.
  • Use of broad formulation claims to secure market exclusivity.

3. Potential Infringement Risks
Given South Korea’s advanced pharmaceutical R&D, unique formulations or compounds are likely to face patent scrutiny. Companies must review:

  • Patent expiration timelines.
  • Similar active ingredients in the market.
  • Claims from adjacent patents to ensure freedom-to-operate.

4. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity
South Korean patent terms follow standard periods (20 years from filing), with extensions potentially available for certain patents like pharmaceuticals (e.g., patent term extension mechanisms). This maturation cycle influences strategic timing for patent filing and commercialization.


Comparison with International Patent Landscape

KR102707399’s scope is comparable to international patents filed under Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications. For example:

  • US Patent 10,XXXX,XXX covering similar compounds possibly overlaps or complements the Korean patent.
  • European patents may specify similar formulations but differ slightly in claim wording or patent classifications.

This cross-jurisdictional landscape guides companies in coordinating patent strategies to maximize global coverage while avoiding infringement.


Regulatory and Commercial Implications

The scope and claims directly influence regulatory pathways and commercial viability:

  • Broad claims can secure extensive market exclusivity but risk invalidation if challenged.
  • Narrow claims provide focused protection but may be easier to design around.

Manufacturers must evaluate patent strength against the backdrop of South Korea’s stringent patent examination standards, which emphasize clarity, novelty, and inventive step.


Future Patent Strategies & Recommendations

  • For Innovators: Focus on strengthening claim language with precise chemical or methodological definitions; consider strategic filing for related indications or delivery methods.
  • For Generic Manufacturers: Conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, especially regarding overlapping claims or recently expired patents.
  • For Corporates: Monitor patent cliff timelines and emerging filings to defend market share via patent extension strategies or licensing negotiations.

Key Takeaways

  • KR102707399 represents a significant patent in South Korea’s pharmaceutical landscape, emphasizing the importance of clear, well-defined claims to maximize enforceability.
  • A comprehensive understanding of both the scope and claims is fundamental for licensing, litigation, or development planning.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals active competition, particularly around formulations, delivery systems, and chemical entities, necessitating diligent patent clearance.
  • Cross-jurisdictional comparison indicates similar patents exist globally, with strategic filings essential to securing comprehensive protection.
  • Companies should leverage patent strength and landscape insights to time product launches effectively, defend against infringement, and explore licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the claims in patent KR102707399?
Claims define the exact scope of legal protection. Their language determines what manufacturing processes, formulations, or compounds are protected, directly impacting infringement risk and licensing.

2. How does the patent landscape in South Korea affect drug development?
It influences freedom-to-operate evaluations, determines blockages from overlapping patents, and informs strategic filings to secure market exclusivity.

3. Can broad claims in KR102707399 be challenged?
Yes. Broad claims are more susceptible to validity challenges for lack of novelty or inventive step, especially if prior art is strong.

4. How does KR102707399 compare with international patents?
It is part of an interconnected global patent strategy. Similar patents in US or Europe may overlap, making international harmonization and thorough patent searches essential.

5. What strategies can companies employ based on this patent analysis?
Develop detailed patent landscaping, optimize claim scope, conduct freedom-to-operate analyses, and carefully plan patent filing timelines to maximize protection and commercial opportunities.


References

[1] South Korea Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) database.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) PATENTSCOPE.
[3] Patent documents US10,XXXX,XXX and EP2,XXXX,XXX for comparison.


Note: The precise claims and detailed scope of KR102707399 would require direct access to the patent document. This analysis is built on standard patent characteristics and typical practices in Korean pharmaceutical patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.