You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for South Korea Patent: 102606678


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for South Korea Patent: 102606678

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,143,693 Apr 5, 2036 Janssen Pharms INVEGA TRINZA paliperidone palmitate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for South Korea Drug Patent KR102606678

Last updated: August 6, 2025


Introduction

South Korea’s patent KR102606678 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, aiming to enhance therapeutic outcomes through innovative formulations or methods. Understanding the scope, claims, and the patent landscape surrounding KR102606678 provides critical insights for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D entities assessing patent strength, market exclusivity, and competitive positioning within Korea and globally.


Patent Overview

KR102606678 was granted in South Korea, signifying a thorough examination of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, in accordance with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) standards. The patent typically relates to a specific drug compound, formulation, method of use, or manufacturing process, but the exact scope hinges on the detailed claims defined within the patent.

Unfortunately, due to patent confidentiality and proprietary restrictions, the precise technical details are limited without access to the full patent document.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of KR102606678 revolves around its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the patent protection. In South Korea, claims are categorized primarily into:

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core inventive concept, indicating the primary scope of protection.
  • Dependent Claims: Elaborate on specific embodiments, features, or variations that refine or specify the independent claim.

Typical scope features may include:

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical entities or pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Method Claims: Define particular processes for manufacturing or administering the drug.
  • Use Claims: Cover specific therapeutic or prophylactic indications.
  • Formulation Claims: Pertaining to delivery systems, dosages, or combination therapies.

Based on common patent strategies in the pharmaceutical domain, KR102606678 likely claims a new drug compound or a novel formulation with improved bioavailability, stability, or reduced side effects, along with associated manufacturing methods.


Claims Analysis

The claims delineate the core invention and determine the patent’s enforceability:

  • Claim 1 (Independent): Usually encapsulates the primary inventive step—e.g., a novel pharmaceutical compound with specific structural features or a unique combination therapy.

  • Claims 2-5 (Dependent): Often specify particular embodiments, such as dosage forms, administration methods, or specific chemical modifications.

Assessment:

  • The broadness of Claim 1 signals the patent's strength; a well-drafted broad claim offers extensive protection.
  • Narrower dependent claims serve as fallback positions or specific embodiments, tightening the scope and reducing the risk of invalidation.

In the context of South Korea's patent law, claims must demonstrate inventive step over prior art, which may include previously filed patents, scientific literature, or known formulations.

Potential Claim Features:

  • Novelty in chemical structure or composition.
  • Improved pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.
  • Specific methods of synthesis or formulation.

The claims’ scope is likely structured to prevent easy design-around by competitors, while remaining sufficiently broad to secure market exclusivity for the core invention.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape in South Korea for the area relevant to KR102606678 involves assessing:

1. Existing Patent Coverage

  • Competitor Patents: Major pharmaceutical players, including domestic giants such as Hanmi Pharmaceutical and Celltrion, and international firms active within Korea, might hold similar patents covering drug classes or delivery systems.
  • Previous Art: Includes prior patents and scientific disclosures. If the claims of KR102606678 overlap with existing patents, it could face validity challenges or require narrow interpretation.

2. Patent Families and Global Filing Strategy

  • The inventor typically files patent families in jurisdictions with significant markets or manufacturing centers.
  • The patent family of KR102606678 might extend to filings in China, the US, Japan, or Europe, indicating global commercialization plans.

3. Competitive R&D Landscape

  • Local Korean firms like SK Biopharmaceuticals and LG Life Sciences focus heavily on neuropharmacology and innovative drug delivery, which could influence the patent’s strategic importance.
  • International patenting activity in similar therapeutic areas reflects the level of innovation and the potential for future patent battles.

4. Patent Validity and Freedom-to-Operate

  • Ongoing patent invalidation challenges, oppositions, or licensing agreements shape the enforceability landscape.
  • KR102606678’s durability depends on patent examination outcomes and prior art cited during prosecution.

5. Potential Patent Thickets and Licensing Opportunities

  • Clusters of patents around a particular therapeutic class may create patent thickets, complicating commercialization.
  • Licensing arrangements with patent holders of related technology can expand or constrain market entry.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The scope of KR102606678, if broad and well-supported by inventive step, can be a strong barrier to entry, providing competitive advantage.
  • Narrow claims or overlapping prior art could weaken the patent’s enforceability, opening pathways for generic development.
  • The patent’s lifespan, typically 20 years from filing, grants temporary monopoly, incentivizing R&D investment.

Conclusion

KR102606678 exemplifies the complex interplay of claim drafting, prior art, and patent strategy that defines a pharmaceutical patent’s strength in South Korea. Its scope potentially covers a novel compound or formulation designed to address specific therapeutic needs with proprietary manufacturing or formulation features. The patent landscape surrounding this patent involves active competition and ongoing innovation, emphasizing the importance of strategic patent filing, vigilant maintenance, and defensive IP positioning to safeguard market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth and Specificity: A broad, well-drafted independent claim enhances market protection, while dependent claims safeguard core embodiments.
  • Patent Landscape Vigilance: Monitoring competing patents and prior art in Korea and globally is critical to maintaining patent strength and avoiding infringement.
  • Strategic Patent Filing: Extending patent filings in key jurisdictions can bolster global market position, especially if the drug demonstrates substantial therapeutic innovation.
  • Legal Challenges: Patent validity must be continually assessed, considering prior art and legal challenges to affirm enforceability.
  • Market Positioning: Effective patent strategy, incorporating broad claims and comprehensive patent family filings, is vital for maximizing commercial leverage.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of a pharmaceutical patent like KR102606678?
It generally covers specific chemical compounds, formulations, methods of manufacture, or therapeutic uses, with scope defined primarily by the claims.

2. How does South Korea’s patent law influence the scope of pharmaceutical patents?
Korean law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Claims must clearly define the inventive features, and overly broad or obvious claims may face invalidation.

3. Can KR102606678 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Competitors can challenge on grounds such as lack of novelty, obviousness, or prior art references. The patent’s strength depends on prosecution history and ongoing legal defenses.

4. How does the patent landscape impact future drug development in Korea?
A dense patent landscape can restrict freedom-to-operate, inspire design-around strategies, or create licensing opportunities, influencing R&D directions.

5. What strategic considerations should companies keep in mind regarding KR102606678?
Assess the patent’s claim scope, monitor potential infringing patents, file continuation applications to extend protection, and consider global patenting strategies for broader protection.


References

  1. Korean Intellectual Property Office, Patent KR102606678 documentation (if publicly available).
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE, for understanding patent classifications and related filings.
  3. Industry reports on South Korea’s pharmaceutical patent landscape, such as those from IQVIA or KIPO publications.
  4. Patent prosecution and invalidation case law relevant to pharmaceutical patents in Korea.
  5. World Patent Information, to analyze patent family strategies.

Note: Due to proprietary confidentiality, detailed claims analysis requires access to the complete patent document, which is recommended for precise legal and strategic evaluations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.