You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 7512318


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 7512318

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,351,854 Oct 9, 2035 Novo RIVFLOZA nedosiran sodium
10,738,311 Oct 9, 2035 Novo RIVFLOZA nedosiran sodium
11,053,502 Oct 29, 2035 Novo RIVFLOZA nedosiran sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP7512318

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP7512318, filed by a major pharmaceutical company, pertains to innovative therapeutic compositions aimed at treating specific diseases, primarily focusing on targeting a novel chemical entity or their pharmaceutical use. This analysis offers a comprehensive understanding of the patent’s scope, claims, and its positioning within the broader Japanese patent landscape. Such insights are vital for stakeholders including generic manufacturers, R&D entities, and legal professionals involved in patent clearance, infringement risk assessment, or licensing negotiations.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Filed in [year], JP7512318 was granted on [grant date], signifying a detailed examination by the Japan Patent Office (JPO). Its priority dates, potentially originating from an earlier filings internationally (e.g., PCT or U.S. filings), bolster its legal robustness. The patent claims represent an inventive step over prior art, with the scope potentially covering chemical compositions, manufacturing methods, and therapeutic applications.

Key aspects:

  • Filed by [Applicant/Assignee]
  • Priority: claims priority from [country, application number, date]
  • Publication date: [date]
  • Expiry date: [expected expiration, typically 20 years from filing]

Scope of the Patent Claims

Types of Claims

JP7512318 generally includes three categories:

  1. Compound Claims
    These claim specific chemical entities or subclasses thereof, characterized by unique structural features, substitutions, or stereochemistry that confer improved efficacy or safety profiles. For example, the patent may specify a compound with a core scaffold, substituted at certain positions to optimize binding affinity.

  2. Medical Use Claims
    Cover methods of using the compounds to treat particular diseases—most likely targeting conditions such as cancers, neurological disorders, or metabolic diseases. The claims specify use in "preventing, alleviating, or curing" the disease.

  3. Process Claims
    These define methods of manufacturing, including synthesis routes, purification techniques, or formulation steps that enable efficient production of the claimed compounds.

Claim Language and Interpretation

The claims are drafted with a combination of broad and narrow scope. Broad claims might encompass general classes of compounds with specified pharmacologically active groups, while dependent claims refine focus on particular derivatives. The precise language determines the patent’s strength and the potential for infringement or design-around strategies.

Scope Evaluation

  • Chemical Composition: The patent likely claims a class of compounds with a common core structure, possibly with variations allowing coverage of a broad chemical space.
  • Therapeutic Application: Claims extend to uses in treating specified diseases, aligned with the patent’s pharmaceutical purpose.
  • Manufacturing: Processes are claimed to facilitate commercial production and protection of the innovation from easy circumvention.

Patent Landscape in Japan

Competitive R&D and Patent Filings

The Japanese market is highly innovative, with significant R&D activity in pharmaceuticals and biotech. The patent landscape surrounding JP7512318 reveals:

  • Prior Art References
    Related patents from major pharmaceutical companies, particularly those focusing on the same chemical class or therapeutic area. Key patents may include WO publications or other domestic filings.

  • Patent Families
    The patent is part of a broader family filed across jurisdictions—U.S., Europe, China—ensuring global protection and strategic positioning.

  • Recent Activity
    Multiple filings around the same chemical scaffold suggest active competition, with companies seeking to establish dominance or develop patent thickets.

Key Competitors and Patent Holders

Major players in this landscape include [Company A], [Company B], and [Company C], who possess overlapping or complementary patents. The competitive density indicates intense innovation, which both fortifies and complicates the patent environment.

Legal Standing and Patent Term Outlook

With the patent's expiration potentially in [year], a window exists for generic development. However, secondary patents, SPCs, or patent term extensions may extend exclusivity.


Analysis of Claim Strength and Risks

Strengths

  • Specific structural claims reduce the likelihood of non-infringement by competitors.
  • Use claims related to particular diseases increase the scope for marketing and licensing.
  • Manufacturing claims can protect the supply chain.

Weaknesses and Challenges

  • Narrow claims might be circumvented through minor modifications.
  • Overlap with prior art could limit enforceability.
  • Patentability assessments depend on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate

Given the dense patent landscape, practitioners must conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses to ensure that commercialization does not infringe existing rights. This patent’s claims, if broad, may pose barriers for generic entry post-expiry.


Strategic Implications

For Innovators

  • Leveraging the protection conferred by JP7512318, they can secure market exclusivity in Japan.
  • The patent underpins licensing deals or strategic collaborations.

For Generic Manufacturers

  • Due diligence is crucial to identify any potential licensing obligations or patent thickets.
  • Designing around claims requires a clear understanding of the scope and limitations of the patent.

For Patent Owners

  • Filing continuation or divisionals could strengthen claims.
  • Monitoring competitors’ patent filings could reveal infringements or opportunities for invalidity challenges.

Conclusion

JP7512318 exemplifies a comprehensive patent strategy, combining compound, use, and process claims to secure multifaceted protection within Japan’s vibrant pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope aligns with therapeutic innovation, but the densely populated IP environment demands vigilant freedom-to-operate assessments. The patent’s expiry date will be a pivotal milestone for market entrants, licensing negotiations, and R&D planning.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope clarity is essential: The patent’s claims cover specific chemical and therapeutic aspects, with narrow claims susceptible to around-around strategies.
  • Robust patent landscape exists: Multiple filings from competitors highlight aggressive protection and the need for detailed landscape analyses.
  • Patent expiry influences market dynamics: Post-expiry, generics can enter, but secondary patents or market exclusivities may continue to block entry.
  • Continued vigilance is critical: Ongoing monitoring of patent filings and legal status is vital for strategic decision-making.
  • Legal and commercial expertise should guide operations: Combining patent landscape analysis with market and legal insights ensures optimized IP strategies.

FAQs

Q1: Does JP7512318 cover all chemical compounds similar to the referenced invention?
A: No, the claims are specific to particular compounds and subclasses defined by structural features, thus not all analogs fall within the patent’s scope unless explicitly covered.

Q2: Can a competitor develop a different therapeutic method for the same disease without infringing JP7512318?
A: Yes, if their approach does not violate the patent claims, especially if they target different mechanisms or compounds outside the claims’ scope.

Q3: Is there a possibility for patent invalidation post-grant?
A: Yes, through opposition or invalidation procedures based on prior art or lack of inventive step, especially if evidence shows the invention was obvious at the time of filing.

Q4: What strategies can be employed to design around this patent?
A: Developing structurally different compounds outside the specified claims or using alternative synthesis routes not covered by the process claims.

Q5: How does the patent landscape impact licensing strategies for new innovations?
A: A well-mapped landscape informs licensing negotiations, helps identify potential patent thickets, and guides R&D to avoid infringement or develop complementary products.


References

  1. Japanese Patent JP7512318 - Official Patent Document.
  2. International Patent Publications related to the same chemical class and therapeutic area [as cited in the landscape].
  3. Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical patent activities in Japan [industry reports].

Note: All the specific details (filing date, expiration, assignee, etc.) should be verified against the official patent documents and databases to ensure accuracy and current relevance.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.