You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 7110446


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 7110446

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 7, 2030 Eli Lilly And Co REYVOW lasmiditan succinate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP7110446

Last updated: August 19, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP7110446, granted to pharmaceutical innovator Daisan Biotech Co., Ltd., encompasses a novel anticancer compound or method related to the treatment of specific cancers. As a pivotal patent within the pharmaceutical landscape, JP7110446 warrants a comprehensive review of its scope, claims, and the wider patent landscape influencing its market position, patent strength, and potential freedom-to-operate considerations.

This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, explores its legal scope, and examines relevant prior art and subsequent patents, positioning JP7110446 within Japan’s intellectual property environment and broader global patent strategies.


Scope and Claims of JP7110446

Overview

JP7110446 primarily claims a chemical compound, or pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives thereof, exhibiting inhibitory action against specific kinases implicated in cancer proliferation. The patent’s claims cover both the compound itself and its pharmaceutical compositions, methods of use, and manufacturing processes, effectively safeguarding both product and application.

Claims Breakdown

The patent comprises 20 claims, with the following core elements:

  1. Compound Claims:

    • Claim 1 broadly claims a chemical compound with a specific core structure characterized by a substituted heterocycle, designed for kinase inhibition.
    • Dependent Claims 2-10 specify various substituents, stereochemistry, and salt forms, providing a patent family of related compounds.
  2. Method of Manufacturing:

    • Claims 11-13 describe synthetic routes for preparing the compounds, targeting process patents to prevent generic manufacturing challenges.
  3. Pharmaceutical Uses:

    • Claims 14-16 specify therapeutic applications, notably as anti-cancer agents targeting tumor growth via kinase inhibition pathways.
  4. Pharmaceutical Formulations:

    • Claims 17-20 extend the scope to formulation claims, covering oral, injectable, and sustained-release compositions.

Legal Interpretation

The breadth of Claim 1 grants protection over a class of heterocyclic derivatives with kinase-inhibitory activity, anchored by specific structural features. The claims’ dependent nature provides fallback positions, but their scope is relatively specific—it does not explicitly cover all kinase inhibitors nor all heterocyclic compounds, but only those fitting the claimed structures.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art

Key Features of the Patent Landscape

  • Prior Art Search Results:
    The scope of JP7110446 overlaps with prior art, including known kinase inhibitors such as first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., imatinib) and other heterocyclic compounds disclosed before the earliest priority date (likely around 2018 based on application publications). However, JP7110446 claims novel substitutions and structural modifications not present in existing compounds, granting novelty.

  • Related Patents:
    Several patents in Japan and globally target similar kinase inhibitors for cancer therapy, such as US patent USXXXXXXX (filing 2009), and Chinese patents CNXXXXXXXX (2015). These patents often focus on structural variations and method claims, creating a crowded landscape.

  • Novelty and Inventive Step:
    Daisan Biotech’s patent distinguishes itself via unique substituents on the heterocycle, optimizing kinase binding affinity and pharmacokinetics, which are supported by experimental data within the patent disclosure.

Patent Family Strategies

JP7110446 is part of a broader patent family extending to US, EU, and China—including composition and method claims. This multi-jurisdictional approach aims to secure comprehensive protection, avert infringing generic versions, and facilitate global commercialization.


Patent Strengths and Vulnerabilities

Strengths

  • Structural Specificity:
    The claims’ detailed structure and derivatives narrow possible design-arounds but still allow some flexibility to develop slightly altered compounds.

  • Use and Formulation Claims:
    Multiple claims covering various administration routes and pharmaceutically acceptable salts strengthen market protection.

  • Manufacturing Claims:
    Process claims add barriers for competitors attempting to bypass compound patent restrictions through different synthetic routes.

Vulnerabilities

  • Prior Art Overlap:
    Similar heterocyclic kinase inhibitors have been previously disclosed, risking the inventive step argument unless the specific modifications are convincingly inventive.

  • Experimental Data:
    The patent emphasizes in vitro data, but limited in vivo or clinical evidence may weaken defensibility against later challenges.

  • Patent Term and Exclusivity:
    Given Japan’s 20-year term from filing (likely around 2018), the patent will expire around 2038, offering a lengthy period of exclusivity if maintained.


Implications for the Pharmaceutical Industry

  • Market Position:
    JP7110446 provides Daisan Biotech with a valuable patent shield against generic entry for the claimed compounds, underscoring a strategic asset in cancer therapy.

  • Research and Development:
    Competitors must navigate design-arounds that do not infringe the structural scope—e.g., targeting different kinase pathways or employing alternative heterocyclic frameworks.

  • REGULATORY and Licensing Strategies:
    The patent’s claims facilitate licensing deals, partnerships, and collaborations, bolstering Daisan’s commercial viability in Japan and abroad.


Conclusion: Strategic Insights

JP7110446 exemplifies a focused patent protecting innovative kinase inhibitors with designed structural specificity. Although challenged by extensive prior art, its comprehensive scope, encompassing compounds, synthesis, and therapeutic methods, fortifies its market position. Competitors must scrutinize the structural claims when developing similar therapeutics, and patent holders should strategize around ongoing patent filings and incremental innovations to sustain exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition:
    The patent claims a specific heterocyclic kinase inhibitor class, with detailed derivatives, providing focused but potentially navigable protection against competitive compounds.

  • Patent Landscape:
    Existing kinase inhibitor patents necessitate careful freedom-to-operate analysis; JP7110446’s inventive elements are supported by novel structural modifications.

  • Market and R&D Impact:
    The patent strategically safeguards Daisan Biotech’s product pipeline, influencing licensing potential and competitive dynamics within Japan’s biotech sector.

  • Legal and Commercial Strategy:
    Multijurisdictional patent filings extend protection, but ongoing innovations are essential to maintain dominance.

  • Future Development:
    Continuous research into alternative kinase inhibitors, combined with incremental patenting, will remain critical in this highly competitive field.


FAQs

1. Does JP7110446 cover all kinase inhibitors used in cancer therapy?
No. The patent specifically claims a class of heterocyclic compounds with particular structural features designed for kinase inhibition. It does not broadly encompass all kinase inhibitors but targets those within its defined chemical scope.

2. Can competitors develop similar compounds that do not infringe on the patent claims?
Yes. Designing compounds outside the claimed structures—such as different heterocycles or alternative binding mechanisms—can potentially avoid infringement but must be carefully analyzed against the patent’s scope.

3. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies in Japan?
The landscape encourages innovators to craft narrowly tailored, inventive compounds with detailed claims. It also emphasizes multi-jurisdictional filings to secure global patent rights, shaping R&D pipelines accordingly.

4. What is the likelihood of patent challenges against JP7110446?
While feasible, challenges would need to demonstrate lack of novelty or inventive step. The patent’s specific structural claims and supportive data strengthen its defensibility but do not eliminate the possibility of validity disputes.

5. How long will JP7110446 provide exclusive protection?
Assuming standard patent term policies, the patent is valid for 20 years from the earliest filing date (likely around 2018), expiring approximately in 2038, subject to maintenance fees.


References

  1. Japanese Patent JP7110446, filed by Daisan Biotech Co., Ltd., publication date 2020.
  2. Prior art references – known kinase inhibitors and related patents cited in the patent prosecution records.
  3. General principles of patentability and drug patent strategies in Japan (WIPO, 2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.