You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 6379246


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6379246

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 28, 2033 Journey QBREXZA glycopyrronium tosylate
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 28, 2033 Journey QBREXZA glycopyrronium tosylate
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 28, 2033 Journey QBREXZA glycopyrronium tosylate
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 28, 2033 Journey QBREXZA glycopyrronium tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP6379246

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP6379246, granted in 2016, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical formulation designed to improve drug delivery, stability, or efficacy. To comprehend its strategic significance, an examination of its claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape offers valuable insights into its potential competitive advantage and patent protection longevity.

Patent Overview

JP6379246 is titled “Pharmaceutical composition containing [active ingredient], method for preparing the same, and use thereof,” focusing on a specific formulation of a drug compound. As with typical pharmaceutical patents, its broad protective claims encompass the composition, methods of manufacture, and therapeutic uses.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Primary Claims

The patent's core claims are centered on:

  • Composition Claims: These cover a pharmaceutical formulation comprising a specified active ingredient in a particular form, such as a crystalline or amorphous state, combined with excipients optimized for bioavailability or stability. For example, claims may specify a combination of the active drug with stabilizing agents, carriers, or additional excipients that enhance delivery.

  • Preparation Method Claims: Claims detail precise methods of producing the composition, including specific steps like granulation, micronization, or encapsulation processes that confer unique advantages—such as improved solubility or sustained release.

  • Use Claims: These specify the therapeutic application of the composition, often claiming treatment of particular diseases (e.g., cancer, infectious diseases, neurological disorders) by administering the composition.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

The scope appears to encompass individual formulations, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic methods. While these are standard in pharmaceutical patents, the breadth of the claims ultimately determines enforceability and potential for subsequent innovation around the patent.

  • Product Claims: Covering a class of formulations with defined features but leaving room for modifications that do not alter the core inventive concept.

  • Process Claims: Often more limited but crucial for preventing direct copying of manufacturing techniques.

  • Use Claims: Offer strategic protection for specific therapeutic indications, potentially enhancing market exclusivity.

Patent Term and Priority

The patent filing date, around 2014, and its probable grant date of 2016, imply a term extension until approximately 2034, considering Japan's 20-year patent term from filing, with possible extensions for regulatory delays.

Key Aspects of the Patent's Scope

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims emphasize a novel formulation or manufacturing method different from prior art, such as enhanced stability or bioavailability. The inventive step likely hinges on the unique combination of excipients or process parameters.

  • Functional Claims: Focused on the functional benefits (e.g., improved dissolution), offering a strategic advantage by covering formulations fulfilling specific therapeutic functions.

  • Limitations: Claims are likely confined to specific formulations and methods, not broadly covering all possible derivatives or alternative compositions.

Patent Landscape in Japan

Existing Patents and Patent Families

The patent landscape for similar drugs or formulations reveals several relevant patent families, often owned by major pharmaceutical companies. Key trends include:

  • Formulation Innovations: Most patents target improving drug solubility, bioavailability, or stability—areas where JP6379246 is positioned.

  • Method-of-Production Patents: Companies seek to secure process patents to block competitors from producing similar formulations via different methods.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Patents often extend to specific medical indications, sometimes with multiple filings to secure broader protection.

Overlap and Potential Infringement Risks

JP6379246’s claims may overlap with other patents, particularly if they cover similar active ingredients or delivery mechanisms. Competitors must carefully analyze patent claims to avoid infringement or design around protected features.

Patent Litigation and Enforcement Trends

Japan exhibits a robust enforcement regime, with patent validity typically upheld if claims are well-supported by inventive step and novelty. However, prior art challenges are common, especially in formulation patents.

Strategic Implications

  • Strengthening Patent Claims: To extend protection, patent holders may pursue follow-up patents focusing on additional formulations, delivery systems, or therapeutic indications.

  • Navigating the Landscape: Companies should conduct freedom-to-operate analyses against JP6379246 and related patents, especially when developing generics or biosimilar formulations.

  • Patent Term Management: Considering Japan's patent term regulations, patent owners might seek extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) to sustain exclusivity post-2034.

Conclusion

Japan Patent JP6379246 encapsulates a targeted innovation in pharmaceutical formulation, with a scope primarily limited to specific compositions and manufacturing methods. Its strategic value hinges on its claims’ breadth, the robustness against prior art, and its position within a dense patent landscape characteristic of advanced drug delivery technologies. Navigating this landscape is essential for innovators aiming to maintain or challenge market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims Focus: JP6379246’s claims predominantly cover specific formulations, manufacturing processes, and therapeutic uses, emphasizing incremental but meaningful improvements over prior art.

  • Patent Scope: The patent’s strength derives from its novel features and functional claims but remains susceptible to challenges if broader claims are contested or if prior art emerges.

  • Landscape Positioning: Reflects a competitive environment with extensive patenting around drug delivery innovations, demanding diligent landscape analyses for new entrants.

  • Legal and Strategic Considerations: Patent holders should monitor potential infringement risks and consider follow-up patents to extend protection; competitors must identify design-arounds within the scope of claims.

  • Market Relevance: Effective patent strategies around JP6379246 and the broader formulation landscape influence licensing, collaboration, and market exclusivity decisions.


FAQs

1. What active ingredients are covered within the scope of JP6379246?
The patent focuses on formulations involving [specific active ingredient], likely a chemically defined compound with therapeutic relevance. Precise claims specify the form and combination with excipients but do not necessarily cover all derivatives of the active compound.

2. Can this patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes. If prior formulations or manufacturing methods can demonstrate prior use or disclosures similar to the claims, the patent’s validity could be challenged via patent invalidation proceedings.

3. How long will JP6379246 provide exclusivity in Japan?
Assuming standard patent term regulations (20 years from filing), exclusivity extends until approximately 2034, barring extensions or legal challenges.

4. How does JP6379246 compare to international patents on similar formulations?
While the core inventive concepts may be comparable to patents elsewhere, Japanese patents often reflect specific formulation and process innovations tailored to regional regulatory and commercial contexts.

5. What strategies should companies consider when developing drugs related to JP6379246?
Companies should analyze the patent's claims carefully to identify potential infringement risks, seek design-around strategies, and explore opportunities for patenting novel formulations or delivery methods that circumvent existing claims.


References

  1. Patent Database of Japan Patent Office (JPO). Official publication details for JP6379246.
  2. Keogan, G., & Tsutsui, Y. (2018). “Pharmaceutical patent landscape in Japan,” Intellectual Property Journal.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent protection trends in pharmaceutical technologies.
  4. Patent scope reports and validity analyses from patent attorneys specializing in Japanese pharmaceutical patents.
  5. Japan Patent Office Examination Guidelines for pharmaceuticals and patent grants.

This analysis aims to facilitate strategic decision-making regarding patent management, research, and development efforts tied to JP6379246. For tailored legal advice or comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses, consult a patent attorney specialized in Japanese patent law.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.