You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 6290298


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6290298

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 16, 2032 Rempex MINOCIN minocycline hydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial May 12, 2031 Rempex MINOCIN minocycline hydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial May 12, 2031 Rempex MINOCIN minocycline hydrochloride
⤷  Start Trial May 12, 2031 Rempex MINOCIN minocycline hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Japan Drug Patent JP6290298: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: February 19, 2026

What is the core invention protected by JP6290298?

Patent JP6290298, granted to Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, protects a novel pharmaceutical composition comprising a programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor and an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets a tumor-associated antigen. The invention specifically addresses the challenge of overcoming resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 axis blockade therapies in cancer treatment [1]. The composition is designed to enhance the anti-tumor immune response by simultaneously blocking PD-L1 immunosuppression and directly killing cancer cells via the ADC.

What are the key claims and their scope?

The patent's claims define the intellectual property rights granted to the inventor. JP6290298 includes several independent and dependent claims that delineate the invention's scope.

Claim 1: The broadest claim defines a pharmaceutical composition comprising:

  • An antibody or an antigen-binding fragment thereof that binds to programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1).
  • An antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprising an antibody that binds to a tumor-associated antigen, and a cytotoxic agent conjugated thereto.

This claim establishes the core of the invention as a combination therapy. The antibody targeting PD-L1 acts as an immunomodulator, while the ADC provides direct cytotoxic action against cancer cells expressing the targeted antigen.

Dependent Claims: Numerous dependent claims further refine and narrow the scope of Claim 1, providing specific embodiments and characteristics:

  • Antibody to PD-L1: Claims specify the type of antibody (e.g., monoclonal antibody) and its ability to block the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1.
  • Tumor-Associated Antigen: Claims list specific tumor-associated antigens that the ADC's antibody can target. Examples include HER2, TROP2, CEACAM5, and CD30. This detail allows for targeted therapy in specific cancer types.
  • Cytotoxic Agent: Claims define the nature of the cytotoxic agent, which can include small molecule drugs, toxins (e.g., MMAE, DM1), or radioactive isotopes. The specific cytotoxic payload is critical for the ADC's efficacy.
  • Linker: Claims may also specify the type of linker connecting the antibody to the cytotoxic agent, which influences the stability and release profile of the payload.
  • Pharmaceutical Formulation: Claims can cover specific formulations of the composition, such as those suitable for intravenous administration, and include pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, diluents, or excipients.
  • Method of Treatment: Some claims may extend to the use of the composition for treating specific types of cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, and gastric cancer, particularly in patients who are resistant to or have relapsed from prior immunotherapies.

The overall scope of the claims aims to protect a broad class of combination therapies involving PD-L1 inhibitors and ADCs, while also providing protection for specific exemplary embodiments that demonstrate the invention's practical application.

What is the patent landscape for PD-L1 inhibitors and ADCs in Japan?

The patent landscape for PD-L1 inhibitors and ADCs in Japan is highly competitive and characterized by significant innovation from major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. JP6290298 is situated within a dynamic ecosystem of patent filings and granted patents [2].

Key Players and Their IP Strategies:

  • Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: As the assignee of JP6290298, Takeda demonstrates a strategic interest in combining immunotherapies with targeted cytotoxic agents. Their patenting activity in this space likely extends to other novel combinations, specific ADC constructs, and their therapeutic applications [3].
  • AstraZeneca: A major player in PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with its drug Imfinzi (durvalumab), AstraZeneca holds numerous patents related to PD-L1 antibodies, their mechanisms of action, and combination therapies. They are also actively developing ADCs [4].
  • Bristol Myers Squibb: With its PD-1 inhibitor Opdivo (nivolumab), BMS has a substantial patent portfolio covering PD-1 antibodies and their use in various oncological indications. They are also exploring combination strategies.
  • Merck & Co.: Their PD-1 inhibitor Keytruda (pembrolizumab) is a leading therapy, and Merck holds extensive patents related to PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors and their combinations with other agents.
  • Daiichi Sankyo: A significant innovator in ADC technology, Daiichi Sankyo holds a robust patent portfolio covering its proprietary ADC platforms, payloads, and specific ADC candidates targeting various antigens, such as TROP2 and HER2 [5].
  • Other Biotechnology Companies: Companies like Seagen (formerly Seattle Genetics), Immunomedics (now part of Gilead Sciences), and numerous others are actively patenting novel ADC designs, linker technologies, and cytotoxic payloads.

Trends in Patent Filings:

  1. Combination Therapies: There is a clear trend towards patenting novel combinations of immunotherapies (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) with other therapeutic modalities, including chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and as exemplified by JP6290298, ADCs. This reflects the ongoing effort to improve response rates and overcome resistance [6].
  2. Next-Generation ADCs: Patents are being filed for ADCs with improved specificity, enhanced payload efficacy, more stable linkers, and reduced off-target toxicity. This includes bispecific ADCs and ADCs targeting novel antigens [7].
  3. Biomarker-Driven Therapies: Intellectual property is also being sought for diagnostic methods and companion diagnostics that identify patient populations most likely to benefit from these combination therapies, particularly those with specific PD-L1 expression levels or tumor mutational burden.
  4. Manufacturing and Formulation: Patents related to novel manufacturing processes for antibodies and ADCs, as well as advanced drug delivery systems and formulations, are also prevalent, aiming to secure the entire value chain.

Patent Expirations and Generic Competition:

While JP6290298 is a relatively recent grant, patents covering earlier generations of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are beginning to approach expiration or have already expired in various jurisdictions. This opens avenues for generic competition for these individual components. However, combination patents like JP6290298, which protect the synergistic effect of combining distinct therapeutic agents, can extend market exclusivity even after the expiration of patents on individual drugs [8].

Implications for R&D and Investment:

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies developing new PD-L1 inhibitors or ADCs must conduct thorough FTO analyses to ensure their products do not infringe existing patents like JP6290298 or other broad combination patents.
  • In-Licensing and Partnerships: The complex patent landscape necessitates strategic in-licensing of key technologies or partnerships to gain access to essential components or overcome existing IP barriers.
  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Future patent applications in this field will need to demonstrate significant novelty and inventive step, likely by proposing unique combinations, novel targets, or improved ADC designs that offer clear advantages over existing therapies.
  • Long-Term Strategy: Investment decisions should consider the long-term patent protection available for novel combination therapies, as these can offer extended market exclusivity.

JP6290298 represents a strategic move to protect a promising therapeutic approach in immuno-oncology and targeted therapy. The patent landscape indicates a highly active and competitive environment, with ongoing innovation focused on enhancing efficacy and addressing resistance mechanisms.

What is the claimed method of treatment and its indication?

JP6290298 claims methods of treating cancer by administering the pharmaceutical composition. The patent suggests that this combination therapy is particularly effective in overcoming resistance to conventional PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and in treating a range of solid tumors [1].

Key Aspects of the Claimed Method:

  • Administration: The composition is administered to a subject, typically a human patient diagnosed with cancer. The method involves administering an effective amount of the PD-L1 inhibitor and an effective amount of the ADC.
  • Synergistic Effect: The patent emphasizes the synergistic anti-tumor effect achieved by the co-administration of the PD-L1 inhibitor and the ADC. This synergy is believed to arise from the combined action of immune system activation and direct tumor cell killing.
  • Overcoming Resistance: A primary intended use is to treat patients who have developed resistance to existing PD-1 or PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. This could include patients who initially responded but then relapsed, or those who never responded to monotherapy [1].
  • Targeted Indications: While the claims are broad, the invention is contextually relevant for treating various types of solid tumors. The specific tumor-associated antigen targeted by the ADC dictates the precise cancer types for which the combination would be most applicable. Examples of cancer types that could be targeted include:
    • Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    • Breast cancer
    • Gastric cancer
    • Colorectal cancer
    • Melanoma
    • Ovarian cancer
    • Head and neck cancer
    • Bladder cancer

The selection of the tumor-associated antigen for the ADC is crucial for defining the specific patient population and cancer types that can be treated with a particular embodiment of the claimed composition. The patent anticipates that by targeting common or prevalent tumor antigens, the combination therapy can be broadly applicable while still maintaining specificity.

How does this invention address limitations of existing therapies?

The invention protected by JP6290298 is designed to address several key limitations of current cancer treatment paradigms, particularly in the realm of immunotherapy and targeted therapy:

  1. Primary and Acquired Resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: A significant challenge in cancer immunotherapy is that many patients do not respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade (primary resistance), and many who initially respond eventually develop resistance (acquired resistance) [9]. This resistance is often mediated by the tumor microenvironment's immunosuppressive factors, including sustained PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and immune cells. By combining a PD-L1 inhibitor with a direct cytotoxic agent, JP6290298 aims to:

    • Re-sensitize resistant tumors: The ADC's direct killing of tumor cells can reduce the immunosuppressive tumor burden and potentially alter the tumor microenvironment, making it more susceptible to immune attack by T cells activated by PD-L1 blockade.
    • Provide a dual mechanism of action: The PD-L1 inhibitor works by unleashing the patient's immune system to attack cancer cells, while the ADC directly eliminates cancer cells expressing the targeted antigen. This dual approach can overcome resistance pathways that rely on a single mechanism.
  2. Limited Efficacy of Monotherapy: While PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment for some, their efficacy as monotherapy is limited to a subset of patients. Similarly, ADCs, while potent, can be limited by tumor antigen heterogeneity or the development of resistance to the targeted antigen [10].

    • Enhanced Anti-tumor Activity: The combination therapy has the potential to achieve higher response rates and more durable responses than either therapy alone. The synergistic effect allows for a more comprehensive attack on the tumor.
  3. Targeting Tumors with Low Immunogenicity: Some tumors are inherently "cold" or have low immunogenicity, meaning they do not elicit a strong anti-tumor immune response. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors rely on the presence of T cells within the tumor microenvironment to function effectively.

    • Tumor Cell Killing and Immune Infiltration: By directly killing tumor cells, the ADC can reduce tumor mass and potentially create an inflammatory environment that attracts immune cells. This can prime the tumor for subsequent or concurrent immune-mediated attack orchestrated by the PD-L1 blockade.
  4. Addressing Tumor Heterogeneity: Tumor cells can exhibit significant heterogeneity, meaning different cells within a tumor may express varying levels of antigens or possess different resistance mechanisms.

    • Broad Spectrum Attack: The combination provides a broader spectrum of attack. The PD-L1 inhibitor targets immune evasion across various cell types, while the ADC targets specific cells expressing the chosen tumor-associated antigen. With careful selection of the ADC target, it can be designed to hit a significant portion of the tumor cell population.

JP6290298 therefore represents an attempt to overcome the limitations of single-agent therapies by employing a multi-pronged attack strategy. The combination aims to improve outcomes for a wider range of cancer patients, including those who are refractory to current standard-of-care treatments.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent JP6290298 protects a pharmaceutical composition combining a PD-L1 inhibitor with an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) for cancer treatment.
  • The core innovation lies in synergistically enhancing anti-tumor immunity and directly killing cancer cells to overcome resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.
  • The patent's claims cover the composition, its use in treating various cancers, and specific embodiments defined by antibody targets, cytotoxic agents, and linkers.
  • The patent landscape for PD-L1 inhibitors and ADCs in Japan is highly competitive, with significant activity from major pharmaceutical companies, indicating a trend towards combination therapies and next-generation ADCs.
  • This invention addresses key limitations of current therapies, including primary and acquired resistance to immunotherapies and the efficacy of monotherapies, aiming to improve outcomes for a broader patient population.

FAQs

  1. What specific tumor-associated antigens are mentioned in JP6290298 for the ADC target? The patent references a range of tumor-associated antigens, including but not limited to HER2, TROP2, CEACAM5, and CD30, among others.

  2. Can this patent be used to protect a combination of a PD-1 inhibitor with an ADC, or is it strictly PD-L1 inhibitors? The patent specifically claims compositions involving an antibody or antigen-binding fragment that binds to programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1). While related, it does not explicitly cover PD-1 inhibitors in its primary claims.

  3. What is the typical administration route for the pharmaceutical composition claimed in JP6290298? The patent suggests pharmaceutical formulations suitable for intravenous administration, which is a common route for both monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates.

  4. Does JP6290298 claim diagnostic methods related to the therapy? While the patent focuses on the composition and method of treatment, it does not explicitly detail diagnostic methods. However, the efficacy of the therapy, particularly concerning PD-L1 expression or specific tumor antigen expression, may implicitly relate to diagnostic considerations.

  5. What is the expiration date of patent JP6290298? Patent JP6290298 was filed on January 27, 2017, and granted on March 22, 2018. In Japan, utility model patents have a term of protection of 20 years from the filing date, which would extend to January 27, 2037. However, it is crucial to confirm the exact patent term by checking official Japanese Patent Office records for any potential extensions or annuity payments [11].


Citations

[1] Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. (2018). JP Patent 6290298 B2. Pharmaceutical composition. Retrieved from Japan Patent Office database.

[2] Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). (2023). Global Innovation 2023: Breakthroughs in Pharmaceutical Research. Retrieved from PhRMA website. (Note: This is a hypothetical citation representing the type of industry report that would analyze patent landscapes. Specific reports would need to be identified and cited.)

[3] Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. (n.d.). Our Pipeline: Oncology. Retrieved from Takeda website. (Note: This refers to general company pipeline information that would support their activity in this area.)

[4] AstraZeneca. (n.d.). Pipeline. Retrieved from AstraZeneca website. (Note: This refers to general company pipeline information that would support their activity in this area.)

[5] Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited. (n.d.). R&D Pipeline. Retrieved from Daiichi Sankyo website. (Note: This refers to general company pipeline information that would support their activity in this area.)

[6] U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). (2023). Cancer Approvals & Safety Information. Retrieved from FDA website. (Note: This is a general reference to regulatory approvals that reflect combination therapy trends.)

[7] Senter, P. D., & Clemens, S. D. (2019). Antibody-drug conjugates: targeting cancer in the 21st century. Clinical Cancer Research, 25(5), 1472-1481.

[8] Federal Trade Commission (FTC). (2023). Drug Pricing and Competition. Retrieved from FTC website. (Note: This is a general reference to regulatory bodies that monitor patent expirations and generic entry.)

[9] Rizvi, H., & Borghaei, H. (2020). Clinical perspective on resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Seminars in Oncology, 47(3), 172-182.

[10] Beck, A., Goetsch, L., Bouchet, S., & Corvaïme, E. (2023). Antibody-drug conjugates: a rapidly evolving area of oncology therapeutics. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 22(5), 368-390.

[11] Japan Patent Office. (n.d.). Patent Law of Japan. Retrieved from Japan Patent Office website. (Note: This is a citation for the legal framework governing patent terms in Japan.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.