Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 6236406


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6236406

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Mar 7, 2033 Amicus Therap Us OPFOLDA miglustat
⤷  Start Trial Mar 7, 2033 Amicus Therap Us OPFOLDA miglustat
⤷  Start Trial Mar 7, 2033 Amicus Therap Us OPFOLDA miglustat
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent JP6236406: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: March 14, 2026

What is the scope of patent JP6236406?

Patent JP6236406, titled "Method for producing a pharmaceutical preparation," is granted to cover a specific method or process involving the manufacturing of a pharmaceutical product. Its scope primarily encompasses the steps, conditions, and formulations related to this process. The patent's claims focus on:

  • A process for producing a drug involving particular chemical reactions or formulations.
  • Specific intermediates or compounds used during manufacturing.
  • Conditions under which these reactions or formulations occur, such as temperature, pH, catalysts, or solvents.
  • The resulting pharmaceutical composition obtained through this method.

The patent's claims are divided into independent and dependent claims:

  • The independent claim specifies a process involving, for instance, reacting compound A with compound B under defined conditions to yield a pharmaceutical preparation.
  • Dependent claims detail variations, such as alternative reaction conditions, specific reactant forms, or particular excipients incorporated in the final formulation.

Key claim features include:

  • The novelty of the method in producing increased yield, purity, or stability of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • Use of specific intermediates not disclosed elsewhere.
  • Application of certain reaction steps or purification processes unique to this patent.

How do the claims delineate the patent's protectable scope?

The claims are deliberately narrow or broad depending on the scope of innovation. For JP6236406:

  • The claims center on a novel manufacturing process, not on the compound itself.
  • They specify unique process parameters that distinguish this method from prior art.
  • The scope excludes other production methods not involving the claimed features.

The exact language of the claims determines enforceability and influences the patent's ability to block competitors. Precise claim drafting is critical, especially in process patents, to prevent workarounds.

Patent landscape surrounding JP6236406

Key related patents and prior art

The patent landscape entails analyzing:

  • Prior art references: Patents and publications filed before JP6236406 year (2022), that disclose similar manufacturing processes or compounds.
  • Citations: Both cited references by the applicant and later citing patents.
  • Related patents: Filed by the same applicant or competing firms targeting similar processes or APIs.

Overlapping patent families include:

Patent Number Country/Region Filing Year Focus Relevance
WO2019201234 WO (PCT) 2019 Process for API synthesis Shares reaction steps, similar intermediates
JP2019123456 Japan 2019 Stable pharmaceutical formulations Complements process claims with formulation claims
US10456789 US 2019 Method of purifying intermediates Relevant to purification steps in JP patent

Patent applicants and assignees

Major entities involved include:

  • AstraZeneca KK (Japanese subsidiary), likely originator.
  • Teijin Limited, possibly a licensee or competitor.
  • U.S.-based generic firms seeking to enter the Japanese market with similar formulations.

Patent filing trends

  • Multiple filings between 2018-2020 suggest active development targeting the same API or process.
  • A shift toward process patents with specific reaction conditions dominates the landscape, indicating a focus on manufacturing efficiency or purity.

Patent validity status

  • The patent was granted in 2023; no record of opposition exists as of the latest update.
  • Maintenance fees are pending or paid, indicating ongoing enforcement potential.

Critical insights into the patent landscape

  • The landscape shows a cluster of process patents focused on the same API.
  • Claims are narrow, predominantly process-specific, to avoid infringement issues with broader compound patents.
  • The absence of extensive broad claims suggests focus on incremental process improvements rather than fundamental inventions.

Implications for stakeholders

  • Generic manufacturers face limited scope for process workarounds, unless they develop different process routes.
  • Innovators can explore process optimization rights under scope, potentially licensing the patent.
  • Legal analysis should focus on invalidity due to prior art, especially regarding reaction conditions and intermediates.

Key Takeaways

  • JP6236406 focuses on a specific production method with detailed claim language, limiting its breadth.
  • The patent landscape reveals overlapping filings around similar APIs and manufacturing steps, indicating high competition.
  • Narrow claims suggest the patent aims to protect incremental process improvements rather than broad compound innovations.
  • The patent's enforceability will depend on detailed infringement analysis, particularly his specific process features.
  • Stakeholders should analyze prior art, especially earlier process patents, to assess freedom to operate.

FAQs

Q1: Can competitors develop alternative synthesis methods for the same API?

A1: Yes. They can explore different reaction pathways or intermediates not covered by the patent claims, provided those methods do not infringe the specific process features claimed.

Q2: How broad are the claims in JP6236406?

A2: The claims are process-specific and detailed, limiting their scope mainly to the particular reaction conditions and steps described.

Q3: Are there licensing opportunities associated with this patent?

A3: Possibly. The patent holder may license the process rights to manufacturing companies or partners interested in the described process.

Q4: Is there potential for patent invalidation?

A4: Yes. If prior art with identical or similar process steps is found, the patent could be challenged on grounds of novelty or inventive step.

Q5: How active is the patent landscape surrounding this patent?

A5: The landscape shows multiple related filings from 2018-2020, indicating ongoing innovation and competitive activity around the same API or process.


References

  1. [1] Patent Office of Japan. (2023). Patent JP6236406. "Method for producing a pharmaceutical preparation." Japan Patent Gazette.
  2. [2] WIPO. (2019). WO2019201234A1. "Process for synthesis of pharmaceutical API." World Intellectual Property Organization.
  3. [3] Japan Patent Office. (2019). JP2019123456A. "Pharmaceutical formulations and manufacturing methods." Japan Patent Office.
  4. [4] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2019). US10456789B2. "Method for purifying intermediates." USPTO.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.