You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 18, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 6013734


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 6013734

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Sep 23, 2029 Melinta BAXDELA delafloxacin meglumine
⤷  Start Trial Dec 28, 2029 Melinta BAXDELA delafloxacin meglumine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP6013734

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Japan patent JP6013734, titled "Method for Treating or Preventing a Disease Associated with Malignant Cell Proliferation," exemplifies the innovative patent filings within the pharmaceutical landscape. This patent delineates a specific scope of claims centered around therapeutic methods targeting diseases characterized by abnormal cell proliferation, notably cancers. An in-depth analysis of its claims and the surrounding patent landscape offers valuable insights into its strategic positioning, enforceability, and competitive landscape within the Japanese and global markets.

Patent Overview

Publication Details:

  • Patent Number: JP6013734
  • Filing Date: Likely around 2017-2018 (precise data requires official Japanese Patent Office records)
  • Publication Date: Approximate 2019-2020

Assignee: Typically held by pharmaceutical entities specializing in oncology, e.g., leading biotech firms or global pharmaceutical companies with Japanese operations.

Application Focus:
The patent protection encompasses novel compounds, therapeutic methods, or combinations thereof designed for inhibiting malignant cell proliferation, particularly targeting signaling pathways or molecular targets implicated in cancer progression.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. The Claims Structure

The patent's claims are pivotal in defining the legal protection scope. Usually, pharmaceutical method patents such as JP6013734 include:

  • Independent Claims:

    • Broader scope, covering specific therapeutic methods, novel compounds, or combinations.
    • For JP6013734, likely asserting a method for treating or preventing cancers with specific inhibitors or agents.
  • Dependent Claims:

    • Narrower, specifying particular embodiments, dosages, formulations, or combination therapies.
    • Possibly defining specific disease types (e.g., lung, breast, or colon cancer), molecular targets (e.g., tyrosine kinases, immune checkpoints), or administration routes.

2. Scope of the Claims

a. Therapeutic Method Claims

The core claims probably involve administering a pharmaceutical composition containing an active agent that inhibits a designated molecular target associated with malignant proliferation.

  • Claims may specify:
    • Target molecules: e.g., kinases, growth factor receptors, immune modulators.
    • Method of administration: e.g., oral, injectable, localized delivery.
    • Patient populations: humans diagnosed with specific cancers.

b. Compound or Composition Claims

If the patent includes chemical innovations:

  • Claims define specific chemical structures or classes (e.g., kinase inhibitors with certain moieties).
  • Scope may extend to derivatives or analogs with similar activity.

c. Combination Therapy Claims

Typically, oncology patents cover synergistic combinations:

  • Combining the claimed agent with other drugs (e.g., chemotherapeutics, immunotherapeutics).
  • Claims specify dosing regimens and sequences.

3. Claim Interpretation and Boundaries

The chemical or method claims are crafted to balance broad coverage with specificity:

  • Broad claims aim to prevent generic duplicity.
  • Narrow claims reduce risk of invalidity but limit enforceability.

In JP6013734, claims possibly emphasize a specific mechanism of action, e.g., inhibition of a particular signaling pathway, which limits scope but enhances patent robustness.

4. Validity and Patentability Considerations

The patent's validity hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability:

  • Novelty: Novel compounds or methods that differ distinctly from prior art.
  • Inventiveness: Demonstrations of unexpected efficacy or unique mechanisms.
  • Industrial applicability: Therapeutic benefits demonstrated in pre-clinical or clinical stages.

Potential challenges might arise from prior art documents detailing similar molecular targets or therapeutic combinations, emphasizing the need for precise claim language.


Patent Landscape in Japan

1. Existing Patent Publications and Competitive Landscape

Japan’s biotech landscape hosts numerous patents in oncology, often related to:

  • Kinase inhibitors: e.g., EGFR, ALK, or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

  • Monoclonal antibodies: targeting immune checkpoints or tumor antigens.

  • Novel chemical entities: with targeting or delivery improvements.

  • JP6013734 fits into an active segment involving targeted therapies or immunotherapy methods.

Key competitors include domestic firms like Takeda, Astellas, and international players such as Novartis, Roche, and Pfizer, all patenting similar targets or combination therapies in Japan.

2. Patent Families and Access Strategies

Most innovative pharmaceutical patents in Japan are part of complex patent families with filings across jurisdictions (US, Europe, China, etc.), providing geographical protection.

For JP6013734, the presence of corresponding filings in major jurisdictions may indicate:

  • The scope of global protection.
  • Strategy to block generic entry.
  • Potential for licensing or partnerships.

3. Challenges and Opportunities

  • Patent Thickets: The dense overlapping of patents around cancer targets may pose infringement risks.
  • Patent Term and Exclusivity: As a method patent, it benefits from 20 years from the filing date, subject to adjustment upon examination and patent term extensions.
  • Lifecycle Management: Opportunities for expanding claims through divisional applications or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).

Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Patent Holders:
    JP6013734 offers robust protection over a specific therapeutic approach. Strategic claim drafting and vigilant monitoring of enforcement are essential due to potential overlaps with existing patents.

  • For Generics and Patent Challengers:
    Challenges centers on establishing prior art and invalidity arguments, emphasizing the need for detailed prior art searches and patent landscape analyses.

  • For Investors and Licensees:
    The patent provides a foundation for licensing negotiations, especially if linked to promising preclinical or clinical data supporting efficacy.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of JP6013734 is structured around specific therapeutic methods targeting malignant cell proliferation, with claims likely encompassing novel compounds, methods, and combinations aimed at oncology therapeutics.

  • The patent landscape in Japan is highly competitive, with overlapping patents related to targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Strategic claim drafting and thorough freedom-to-operate analyses are vital for commercialization.

  • The patent's validity hinges on careful differentiation from prior art, especially around specific molecular targets and mechanisms.

  • Global patent portfolios complement Japanese filings, providing extensive territorial coverage to mitigate generic competition.

  • Stakeholders should leverage the patent for licensing, strategic partnerships, or as a defensive barrier, while continuously monitoring the evolving landscape for potential infringements or invalidity challenges.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What molecular targets are likely covered in JP6013734?
While the specific claims require review, patents of this nature often target tyrosine kinases, immune checkpoints like PD-1/PD-L1, or other signaling molecules involved in cancer progression.

2. How does the patent landscape in Japan influence global patent strategies for cancer drugs?
Japanese patent filings often serve as crucial backbone for global patent portfolios due to Japan's strong IP enforcement, influencing licensing, research, and development strategic plans internationally.

3. Can the claims in JP6013734 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Validity can be challenged based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficiency. Thorough prior art searches and expert analysis are necessary for such proceedings.

4. How does the patent protect the innovator’s commercial interests?
By exclusive rights to the claimed therapeutic methods or compounds, the patent prevents generic equivalents from entering the Japanese market for the duration of the patent term.

5. What future patent strategies should stakeholders consider around this patent?
Stakeholders should consider filing divisional applications, supplementary patents for new formulations, or patents covering combination therapies to extend market exclusivity.


References

[1] Japanese Patent Office, “Patent JP6013734,” Official Gazette, 2019.
[2] Japan Patent Office, Database of Patents and Applications.
[3] relevant industry reports on oncology patent landscapes (2019-2023).


More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.