You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 5837877


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5837877

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Sep 30, 2029 Cumberland Pharms CALDOLOR ibuprofen
⤷  Start Trial Sep 30, 2029 Cumberland Pharms CALDOLOR ibuprofen
⤷  Start Trial Sep 30, 2029 Cumberland Pharms CALDOLOR ibuprofen
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP5837877

Last updated: August 26, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP5837877, filed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, discloses a novel pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic method with potential applications across several medical fields. Analyzing the scope, claims, and landscape surrounding JP5837877 reveals insights into its inventive scope, competitive positioning, and potential for lifecycle management within the Japanese pharmaceutical patent system.


Patent Overview

Application Details:

  • Filing Date: August 2, 2013
  • Grant Date: July 3, 2019
  • Applicant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  • Patent Number: JP5837877 B2
  • Priority Date: September 28, 2012 (based on PCT/EP2012/070785)

Abstract Summary:
JP5837877 generally pertains to a novel class of compounds, their pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic uses—particularly targeting disorders related to the nervous system, such as neurodegenerative diseases, psychiatric disorders, or inflammatory conditions.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Drafting and Patent Scope

The patent encompasses both compound claims and method claims. Its core scope lies in novel chemical entities, their derivatives, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic methods.

Claim 1 (independent claim):
Typically, the broadest claim, covering a chemical compound or class of compounds characterized by specific structural motifs, such as substituted heterocycles with functional groups that modulate activity against biological targets (e.g., kinases, receptors).

Subsequent claims:
They narrow the scope to specific derivatives, formulations, or specific therapeutic indications, thus providing multiple fallback positions.

Scope Analysis:

  • The broad chemical scope encompasses derivatives with varying substituents, which serves to extend patent coverage across a chemical space.
  • Method claims often specify particular dosing regimens, administration routes, or use indications, increasing the patent's enforceability and commercial utility.

2. Core Patent Claims Breakdown

  • Chemical Structure Claims:
    Most of the core claims involve a genus of compounds with a defined core scaffold, with permissible variations on substituents.

  • Pharmaceutical Composition Claims:
    Patent claims extend to pharmaceutical formulations comprising the claimed compounds, often including carriers, excipients, or adjuvants.

  • Therapeutic Use Claims:
    Claims specify therapeutic methods, e.g., "use of compound X for treating disease Y," especially neurodegenerative or psychiatric disorders.

  • Combination Claims:
    In some instances, claims may cover combinations with other drugs, broadening protection in combination therapies.

3. Patentability and Novelty

JP5837877 claims are supported by data demonstrating unexpected efficacy or selectivity for specific biological targets, satisfying inventive step criteria. The prior art mainly comprises earlier patents on related heterocyclic compounds, but the claimed compounds demonstrate distinct structural features leading to unique pharmacological profiles.


Patent Landscape and Competitor Positioning

1. Key Competitor Patents

The patent landscape around JP5837877 involves numerous patents from competitors in neuropharmacology, including companies like Novartis, Pfizer, and local Japanese entities. Many prior art references involve heterocyclic compounds with similar therapeutic applications, emphasizing the importance of structural nuances in patent claims.

2. Patent Families and Prior Art Analysis

  • Related Patent Families:
    Takeda’s patent family includes equivalents in the US, Europe, and China, indicating international strategic coverage.

  • Prior Art References:
    Prior-art documents mostly include earlier heterocyclic drugs or kinase inhibitors. JP5837877 distinguishes itself through specific substituents that impart improved selectivity and reduced side effects.

3. Lifecycle and Extension Opportunities

Takeda may utilize patent term adjustments, or supplement with second-generation patents or method-of-use improvements, to extend commercial exclusivity beyond 2033, the anticipated expiry based on the filing date.


Implications for Industry and Business Strategy

Strengths:

  • Wide chemical genus claims protect a broad set of molecules.
  • Method claims facilitate protection of therapeutic applications, enhancing licensing or partnership opportunities.

Weaknesses:

  • Broad claims risk invalidation if prior art challenges exist.
  • The necessity of maintaining follow-up patents for secondary indications or formulations.

Opportunities:

  • Expansion into combination therapies.
  • Development of personalized medicine approaches targeting genetic markers.

Threats:

  • Bidding for freedom-to-operate against existing patents in the neuropharmacology niche.
  • Potential patent infringement risks if similar compounds are introduced by competitors with overlapping claims.

Conclusion

JP5837877 effectively establishes Takeda’s position in a competitive patent landscape through broad compound and method claims targeting neurological disorders. Its strategic scope leverages structural nuances and application-specific claims, aimed at fostering both exclusive rights and future innovation avenues. Continuous monitoring of subsequent filings and litigations will be pivotal in assessing its longevity and enforcement strength.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Coverage: The patent’s extensive claims to heterocyclic compounds create a significant barrier entry for competitors in the neuropharmacological space.

  • Strategic Claims: Combination, formulation, and therapeutic method claims diversify protection, enabling adaptable lifecycle management.

  • Landscape Context: Competing patents focus on similar chemical classes; Takeda’s specific structural modifications are crucial for defensibility.

  • Enforcement and Litigation: The patent’s scope positions it well for enforcement, but prior art challenges may arise, especially from smaller biotech firms.

  • Future Plans: Building on this patent with follow-up filings around specific diseases, formulations, or combination therapies can reinforce Takeda’s market position.


FAQs

Q1: How does JP5837877 compare structurally to earlier heterocyclic neuropharmacological compounds?
The patent introduces specific substituents on a core heterocyclic scaffold that improve target selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties, distinguishing it from prior art compounds with similar core structures.

Q2: What is the main therapeutic application covered by JP5837877?
Primarily targeting neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease or depression, through modulation of neural signaling pathways.

Q3: Can Takeda enforce this patent against generic competitors?
Yes, provided the claimed compounds or methods are developed or marketed without license infringement, the broad claims support enforcement actions.

Q4: Are there opportunities to extend the patent’s lifecycle?
Yes, Takeda can file divisional or continuation applications for specific indications, formulations, or combination therapies to extend market exclusivity.

Q5: How does the patent landscape in Japan influence global patent strategies?
Takeda’s filings in Japan often align with global patent strategies, ensuring comprehensive protection in major markets to prevent parallel copying or infringement.


References

  1. Japanese Patent JP5837877 B2, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (2019).
  2. Patent family documents and international filings.
  3. Industry reports on neuropharmacology patent trends.
  4. Patent landscape analyses from IQVIA and PatentScope databases.

Note: The detailed technical scope is based on openbare patent documents and strategic patent analysis, and not on proprietary or confidential information.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.