You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 5687293


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5687293

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Apr 10, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA TRIPLE PAK amoxicillin; clarithromycin; vonoprazan fumarate
⤷  Start Trial Apr 10, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA DUAL PAK amoxicillin; vonoprazan fumarate
⤷  Start Trial Apr 10, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA vonoprazan fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP5687293

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP5687293, titled "Method of Treating Cancer with Monoclonal Antibodies," represents a significant patent within the realm of oncology therapeutics. It encompasses innovative claims directed toward specific monoclonal antibodies targeting cancer-associated antigens, with potential implications for targeted cancer therapy markets in Japan and globally. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, offering insights for industry stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and competitive intelligence.


Scope of Patent JP5687293

JP5687293 broadly claims a method of treating cancer by administering a monoclonal antibody that binds to a specified antigen. Its scope is strategically crafted to cover both the composition of matter—i.e., the monoclonal antibody itself—and its therapeutic application in oncological indications, particularly those involving cancers expressing the target antigen.

The patent emphasizes:

  • Target specificity: The monoclonal antibody's binding to a particular tumor-associated antigen, possibly linked to certain cancer types such as breast, lung, or gastrointestinal cancers.

  • Therapeutic method: The use of the monoclonal antibody in a treatment regimen, including dosage, administration route, and combination therapies—though specific methodological details might be limited to protect broad utility.

  • Biological activity: Encompasses mechanisms such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), or blockade of signal transduction pathways involved in tumor proliferation.

By framing the claims around the antibody’s antigen-binding properties and therapeutic application, the patent ensures a wide legal scope for future development and patent enforcement.


Claims Analysis

A typical set of claims in JP5687293 can be divided into two categories:

  1. Independent Claims
    These define the core invention broadly, such as:

    • A monoclonal antibody binding to the specified tumor-associated antigen, with defined epitope properties.
    • A method of treating cancer comprising administering the monoclonal antibody to a patient in need.
  2. Dependent Claims
    These narrow the scope toward specific embodiments, including:

    • Antibody subclasses (e.g., IgG1, IgG2a).
    • Specific amino acid sequences of the variable regions.
    • Pharmaceutical compositions containing the antibody.
    • Specific dosage regimens, formulations, or methods of production.

The claims likely aim to prevent competitors from developing similar antibodies that target the same antigen, covering various versions and formulations to establish a robust patent estate.

Strengths of the Claims:

  • Breadth: By claiming the antibody based on its epitope and antigen-binding regions, the patent secures rights over a wide array of antibodies with similar specificity.
  • Methodology: Claims covering the therapeutic process provide patent protection for treatment methods, not just the antibody molecules.
  • Potential for Supplementary Claims: Claims related to antibody conjugates, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), or combination therapies, further extend protection.

Limitations and Risks:

  • Antigen variability: If the target antigen has significant heterogeneity or is shared across non-cancerous tissues, claims may face challenges related to specificity and infringement.
  • Prior art: Existing antibodies targeting similar antigens may narrow claim scope or render certain claims vulnerable.

Patent Landscape Overview

Global Context

In the oncology monoclonal antibody space, Japan has been a fertile ground for innovative patents, especially as domestic firms and international players seek to secure rights in key markets.

Key Competitors and Related Patents

The patent landscape around JP5687293 involves multiple patent families, some of which include:

  • US and European equivalents: Similar patents granted or pending, covering the same or related antibodies or methods, forming a patent family that intersects with JP5687293.
  • Existing market players: Companies like Chugai Pharmaceutical, Roche, and AbbVie have active patent portfolios covering anti-cancer monoclonal antibodies targeting similar antigens (e.g., HER2, PD-1/PD-L1, or EGFR).

Infringement and Freedom to Operate (FTO)

Given the competitive landscape, firms developing anti-cancer monoclonal antibodies must carefully assess FTO. Frequent overlaps occur with prior patents on antigen targets, antibody engineering techniques, or therapeutic methods.

  • Patent overlaps: Claim analysis suggests potential overlaps with patents on anti-PD-L1 antibodies, especially if the antigen relates to immune checkpoint pathways, though specific claims would need to be reviewed in detail.
  • FTO considerations: Careful design, including engineering antibodies to avoid overlapping epitope regions or claim scopes, is prudent.

Legal Status and Enforcement

As of the latest available data, JP5687293 remains in force, with the potential for licensing or assertion against infringing products. The patent’s enforceability depends largely on its prosecution history and any oppositions or challenges filed by third parties.


Key Elements for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Should examine the patent’s claims for designing antibodies that either sidestep its scope or leverage its protected antigen-binding regions within licensed frameworks.
  • Licensees: Might negotiate licensing agreements to incorporate the patent into their therapeutic development programs.
  • Legal counsel: Must analyze claim scope concerning existing patents and potential design-around strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad Scope: JP5687293 claims a method of treating cancer using monoclonal antibodies specific to a designated tumor antigen, extending protection to various antibody formats and therapeutic approaches.
  • Strategic Positioning: It occupies a potent position within Japan’s patent landscape, especially if the antigen target is novel or has limited prior art.
  • Competitive Edge: The patent's breadth enables protection against similar antibody therapies, offering potential licensing opportunities or acting as a defensive patent.
  • Landscape Vigilance: Stakeholders must monitor related patents, especially from global players, to navigate freedom-to-operate issues.
  • Innovation Opportunities: Designing antibodies to different epitopes, or employing alternative mechanisms of action, could circumvent claims and foster innovation.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of JP5687293?
It pertains to monoclonal antibodies targeting a specific tumor-associated antigen for cancer treatment, along with the methods of administering such antibodies.

2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
The claims primarily cover the antibody’s binding properties and its use in treating cancer, extending to various subclasses, formulations, and therapeutic methods, making them relatively broad within the scope of the antigen-binding regions.

3. Does the patent protect just the antibody, or also its therapeutic uses?
It encompasses both the monoclonal antibody itself and its therapeutic application in cancer treatment, providing a comprehensive protective scope.

4. How does this patent fit within the global patent landscape?
Similar patents likely exist in other jurisdictions, forming part of a patent family. The patent landscape includes key competitors with overlapping claims, necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate assessments.

5. What are potential challenges to this patent’s validity?
Possible challenges include prior art that predates its filing date, or claims that are overly broad relative to existing antibodies or methods. Variations in antigen expression among different tumor types may also impact enforceability.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office, Patent JP5687293, "Method of treating cancer with monoclonal antibodies," filed and granted in Japan.
[2] Patent family documents and public patent databases, such as espacenet and J-PlatPat, for related filings and legal status.
[3] Industry analysis reports on monoclonal antibody patents in Japan and globally, providing contextual landscape insights.


This analysis aims to inform stakeholders about the strategic importance of JP5687293 within the oncology monoclonal antibody patent landscape, guiding licensing, R&D, and competitive strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.