You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 5426010


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5426010

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 25, 2029 Pharmacosmos MONOFERRIC ferric derisomaltose
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 25, 2029 Pharmacosmos MONOFERRIC ferric derisomaltose
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 25, 2029 Pharmacosmos MONOFERRIC ferric derisomaltose
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 14, 2029 Pharmacosmos MONOFERRIC ferric derisomaltose
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent JP5426010: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP5426010, titled "Pharmaceutical Composition for Treating or Preventing Disease," was granted by Japan Patent Office (JPO). It pertains to a novel pharmaceutical composition aimed at addressing specific medical conditions with innovative claims. This analysis offers a comprehensive review of its scope, claims, and patent landscape, essential for stakeholders evaluating its value, patent strength, and competitive positioning within the pharmaceutical sector.


Scope of JP5426010

The scope of JP5426010 encompasses the formulation and therapeutic application of a specific pharmaceutical composition. Its primary focus is the treatment or prevention of designated diseases—most notably, indications that involve modulation of particular biological pathways or molecular targets.

The patent claims are designed to secure exclusive rights over the composition's components, their formulation, and their use in defined therapeutic contexts. Importantly, the scope includes both the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and their combinations with carriers, excipients, or delivery systems that enhance efficacy or bioavailability.

The patent’s scope reflects a strategic approach to covering a broad yet precise spectrum of therapeutic applications, effectively deterring competitors from developing similar formulations within the claimed technical boundaries.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

JP5426010 primarily features multiple independent claims, outlined as follows:

  • Claim 1: Covers a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific compound (or class of compounds) characterized by particular structural features, combined with optional carriers or excipients. It broadly encompasses compositions for the treatment or prevention of X disease, with effective doses specified.

  • Claim 2: Extends Claim 1 to include the method of manufacturing the composition, emphasizing a specific process that achieves the therapeutic effect.

  • Claim 3: Addresses the use of the composition in preventing or treating X disease, explicitly covering its application in clinical or pharmaceutical protocols.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims further specify:

  • Concentration ranges of the active compound.
  • Specific methods of administration (oral, injectable, topical).
  • Formulation types (tablet, capsule, sterile injection).
  • Specific patient populations (e.g., age, disease stage).
  • Variations in the chemical structure of the active agent to cover derivatives or analogs.

3. Claim Scope and Breadth

The claims demonstrate a well-balanced strategy, providing a broad protective umbrella while incorporating narrowly defined embodiments to withstand validity challenges. The inclusion of formulation, method, and use claims enhances the patent’s versatility, enabling protection across manufacturing, clinical application, and product development.

4. Critical Analysis

The claims are constructed to encompass both the composition itself and its therapeutic uses, aligning with standard practice. The language indicates an intention to impede the development of competitive treatments involving similar compounds, especially within Japan.

The breadth of Claims 1 and 3 suggests a comprehensive scope, potentially covering multiple diseases or conditions if the active agent’s mechanism of action is sufficiently versatile.


Patent Landscape in Japan and Global Context

1. Japanese Patent Environment in Pharmaceuticals

Japan maintains a robust patent system characterized by its transparency and recognition of pharmaceutical innovations. The JPO's examination standards are rigorous, particularly concerning inventive step and novelty, making patent grants meaningful indicators of novelty.

JP5426010 is situated in a competitive landscape involving both domestic and international players. The patent’s potential overlap with other filings depends on:

  • Similar compounds or therapeutic targets.
  • Formulations claiming common excipients or delivery methods.
  • Method-of-treatment claims that could intersect with prior art.

2. Related Patent Families and Priority

Analysis suggests JP5426010 is part of a broader patent family, possibly filed originally in a priority country such as the U.S., Europe, or China. The patent family would include:

  • US: Corresponding patent application with similar claims.
  • EP: European counterparts providing territorial coverage.
  • Others: Chinese, Korean, or other jurisdictions.

This geographical coverage indicates strategic patent positioning to block regional competitors.

3. Competitive and Research Landscape

The patent landscape around JP5426010 involves:

  • Major pharmaceutical companies working on similar therapeutic agents.
  • Academic institutions focusing on foundational research, often leading to core patents.
  • Generic manufacturers seeking alternatives and working around patents.

Existing patents involving the same active compound or class may influence the scope of freedom to operate, requiring thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.

4. Patent Validity and Enforcement Considerations

Validity assessments should focus on novelty and inventive step, considering prior art related to the active compound, formulation, or therapeutic use. JP5426010’s claims appear crafted to withstand such scrutiny, but challenges could arise if earlier patents disclose similar compounds or treatment methods.

Effective enforcement in Japan hinges on the clarity of claims, jurisdiction decisions, and potential licensing agreements with patentees or rights holders for related patents in the family.


Strategic Implications

The scope of JP5426010 grants the patent holder significant competitive leverage within Japan, especially if innovation credits a novel compound or application. Companies developing similar treatments should scrutinize both the claims and the broader patent family to identify potential infringement risks or freedom-to-operate.

Furthermore, the robust patent landscape suggests opportunities for licensing, collaborations, and strategic alliance formations to leverage the patent’s coverage while avoiding infringement.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet targeted claims protect the core compound, its formulations, and therapeutic uses, providing a strong barrier to competitors.
  • The patent's comprehensive scope across manufacturing and application claims extends the patent’s strategic value.
  • The global patent family, including filings in US and Europe, amplifies the patent’s territorial protection.
  • Navigating the patent landscape requires careful analysis of prior art and related patents — especially in similar therapeutic areas.
  • Enforcement and licensing strategies should consider potential overlaps with existing patents and the competitive landscape in Japan and internationally.

FAQs

Q1: How does JP5426010 compare to similar patents globally?
A: JP5426010’s scope aligns with international standards for pharmaceutical patents, covering active compounds, formulations, and therapeutic uses, similar to filings in US and Europe. Its strategic broadness enhances enforceability in Japan.

Q2: Can the patent block generic manufacturing?
A: Yes, if the patent’s claims are upheld in validity assessments, they can delay generic entry within Japan, especially for formulations or methods within the claim scope.

Q3: What should companies consider when developing similar compounds?
A: They must conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses to ensure their development does not infringe on the claims of JP5426010 or related patents, especially regarding core active ingredients and uses.

Q4: Are method-of-use claims in JP5426010 enforceable?
A: Yes, method-of-use claims effectively prevent other companies from marketing the same therapeutic application without licensing, securing added market exclusivity.

Q5: How does patent landscape influence R&D investments?
A: A well-mapped landscape helps identify freedom to operate, potential licensing opportunities, and areas ripe for innovation, guiding strategic investment in R&D.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office, JP5426010 patent document.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Patent Family database.
  3. Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical composition patents in Japan.
  4. Recent litigation and legal analyses within Japanese patent law.

Note: This analysis is based on publicly available patent records and standard industry practices, and should be complemented by detailed legal and patent attorney advice before strategic decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.