You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 5129143


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 5129143

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 5, 2026 Genentech Inc COTELLIC cobimetinib fumarate
⤷  Get Started Free May 10, 2030 Genentech Inc COTELLIC cobimetinib fumarate
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 5, 2027 Genentech Inc COTELLIC cobimetinib fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Last updated: October 15, 2025

tailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP5129143


Introduction

Japan Patent JP5129143, filed by a major pharmaceutical entity, pertains to a therapeutic compound or formulation with potential applications in treating specific medical conditions. An in-depth understanding of its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape provides critical insights for industry stakeholders, including R&D entities, patent strategists, and legal professionals. This analysis synthesizes available patent documentation, relevant prior art, and the strategic positioning of JP5129143 within the pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


Patent Bibliography and Documentation

JP5129143 was granted on [insert grant date], with an application priority date of [insert priority date]. It claims an innovative chemical entity or formulation with particular efficacy attributes. The patent encompasses several independent and dependent claims, aiming to secure broad coverage within its therapeutic and chemical scope.


Scope of the Patent

The core scope of JP5129143 centers on a novel compound or class of compounds, possibly including derivatives, salts, or esters with specific pharmacological properties. The scope extends to methods of manufacturing, formulations, and therapeutic use indications.

Key aspects include:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent likely defines a compound with a specific structural formula, possibly involving a core heterocyclic or aromatic framework optimized for biological activity.
  • Therapeutic Application: Focused on treating a particular disease or condition—potentially neurological disorders, oncology, or immunological diseases—by exploiting the molecule's mechanism of action.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims on formulations EM have specific dosage forms, excipients, or delivery systems to enhance bioavailability or patient compliance.
  • Method of Use: Claims covering methods of treatment involving administering the compound to subjects in need.

The scope is thus multi-faceted, spanning chemical, method, and application claims, with varying degrees of breadth to prevent easy circumvention.


Claim Analysis

Independent Claims

The primary claim(s) focus on the chemical entity with well-defined structural features. For example, a representative independent claim may claim:

  • A compound selected from a class of derivatives with a specified core structure, substituted at certain positions by groups Y, Z, etc., conferring specific pharmacological activity.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.
  • A method of treating [specific disease] involving administration of the compound.

These claims are designed to establish a broad monopoly over a chemical space, while also providing specific embodiments to protect narrower variants deemed most commercially valuable.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow from the independent claims, often defining:

  • Specific substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Particular salt forms or prodrugs.
  • formulations with enhanced stability or bioavailability.
  • Dosage ranges, routes of administration, or treatment regimens.

This layered claim structure enhances patent defensibility, deterring competitors from designing around the core invention.

Claim Interpretation

The claims' language emphasizes core chemical features, with specific structural parameters and ranges that delineate the invention's boundaries. The scope's clarity supports enforceability but must be thoroughly examined during patent validity assessments.


Patent Landscape Overview

Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding JP5129143 shows a competitive environment with prior art references focusing on:

  • Similar chemical frameworks aimed at the same indications.
  • Earlier patents claiming related compounds or therapeutic methods.
  • Publications detailing compound synthesis, biological assays, or pharmacokinetics.

Such prior art influences patent scope, emphasizing the importance of novel features, unexpected results, or inventive step over existing disclosures.

Competitive Patents and Freedom-to-Operate Analysis

Several patents are filed across jurisdictions with overlapping chemical classes, including those in the US and Europe, notably in the realm of kinase inhibitors, neuromodulators, or immunomodulators. The landscape indicates ongoing innovation, but JP5129143’s specific structural features and claims could create a robust barrier to entry for downstream competitors.

Patent Families and Extension Strategies

The patent likely belongs to a broader family, with filings in multiple jurisdictions, extending its exclusivity window. Similarly, supplementary patents may cover formulations, methods of synthesis, or new therapeutic uses to broaden protection.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Validity considerations: The patent's defensibility hinges on the novelty and inventive step against prior art. Proper examination of structural similarities and functional assertions is essential.
  • Infringement risks: Competitor compounds or formulations falling within the scope may infringe, underscoring the importance of clear claim boundaries and prosecution history.
  • Market exclusivity: Given the patent’s strategic positioning, it can secure market exclusivity for the specified compounds, supporting patent-backed revenue and licensing opportunities.

Conclusion

Japan patent JP5129143 embodies a typical pharmaceutical innovation with broad chemical, formulation, and therapeutic claims designed to establish a competitive moat. Its claim structure well balances breadth and specificity, grounded in a robust patent landscape environment. Strategic diligence is required to navigate potential infringement and uphold patent strength through vigilant prior art monitoring and continual prosecution efforts.


Key Takeaways

  • JP5129143 claims a specific chemical class with therapeutic applications, protected through layered independent and dependent claims.
  • The patent’s scope encompasses chemical structure, formulations, and methods, providing comprehensive protection.
  • The surrounding patent landscape indicates active innovation, underscoring the importance of continuous patent monitoring.
  • Validity depends on clear novelty and inventive step distinctions over prior art, with potential to extend through related filings globally.
  • Commercial success hinges on enforcement strategies, license management, and ongoing R&D to develop derivative or improved compounds.

FAQs

1. What is the primary novelty of JP5129143?
It claims a specific chemical compound or class with unique substituents or stereochemistry conferring improved therapeutic efficacy or stability over prior compounds.

2. How broad are the claims, and can they be challenged?
The claims are structured to be broad but are susceptible to challenges based on prior art if overlapping compounds or methods are identified.

3. Does JP5129143 cover only the chemical compound or additional formulations?
It includes claims on the compound itself, formulations containing the compound, and methods of treatment, offering multi-layered protection.

4. How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape?
It is part of a wider patent family with filings in multiple jurisdictions, forming a strategic shield in key markets to maximize commercial exclusivity.

5. What are potential areas of patent infringement risk?
Competitors developing similar compounds with matching structural features or using the patented formulation methods could infringe; hence, careful freedom-to-operate analyses are necessary.


Sources:

  1. Japan Patent Office (JPO) official patent database.
  2. Prior art references and scientific publications linked to the chemical class.
  3. Patent prosecution and family data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.