You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 4852728


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 4852728

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 12, 2027 Aeterna Zentaris MACRILEN macimorelin acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent JP4852728: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

The patent JP4852728 pertains to a pharmaceutical composition or method within the Japanese patent system. For business professionals and stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the scope, claims, and patent landscape is crucial for strategic positioning, licensing, and competitive analysis.

This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent's scope and claims, evaluating its strength, potential overlaps, and position within Japan's patent ecosystem. It also highlights key aspects relevant for innovators, generic manufacturers, and investors.


Patent Overview: JP4852728

Filing and Grant Details:

  • Application Number: Not specified here but accessible via Japan Patent Office (JPO) databases.
  • Filing Date: Typically, patents with JP numbers of this format are filed within the last 20 years, likely granted around 2012–2014.
  • Grant Date: Exact date would be confirmed through official filings.
  • Jurisdiction: Japan.

Type:
Likely a method, composition, or use patent related to pharmaceuticals. Such patents often cover new active compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods.


Claims Analysis

Scope of Claims

In Japanese patents, claims generally define the legal scope. JP4852728 is presumed to contain multiple claims, encompassing:

  • Independent Claims: Establish the broadest scope, typically outlining a novel pharmaceutical compound, composition, or therapeutic method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrow the scope, adding specific features such as dosage forms, delivery systems, or particular patient groups.

Given standard practice, the core claim likely covers:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active ingredient or combination.
  • A method of treating a particular disease using that composition.

Possible claim structures:

  • Compound claims: Covering a novel chemical entity, potentially a low molecular weight drug or biologic.
  • Use claims: Covering specific therapeutic indications or methods of administration.
  • Formulation claims: Covering particular formulations, delivery systems, or dosage forms.

Discussion on Claim Language

In Japanese patents, claim language tends to be precise with:

  • Numeric ranges: For dosage or concentration, e.g., "an amount of X mg to Y mg."
  • Structural features: For compounds, specific chemical groups or stereochemistry are emphasized.
  • Method steps: If relevant, specific steps of administering or preparing the composition are detailed.

The scope's breadth depends on how broad or narrow these claims are. Broad claims that encompass multiple chemical classes or indications tend to offer stronger protection but face higher prior art challenges.


Patent Scope and Strategic Implications

Strengths:

  • If the patent claims a novel chemical compound, its scope is inherently strong, especially if the compound has unique pharmacological properties.
  • Use claims that cover methods of treatment can extend protection even if the compound itself is known, thereby covering therapeutic applications.
  • Claims covering specific formulations provide additional layers of protection against generic competitors.

Weaknesses:

  • Narrow claims limited to a particular compound or use may weaken enforceability.
  • Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art exists, especially in highly competitive pharmaceutical landscapes.

Potential Challenges:

  • Patentability over prior art may depend on the novelty and inventive step of the claimed compound or method.
  • If similar compounds or methods exist in prior art, narrower claims are necessary to maintain validity.

Patent Landscape Context

Japanese Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Japan's patent system supports composition, method, and use patenting, with a vigorous examination process emphasizing inventive step and novelty. The patent landscape in Japan is highly competitive, especially for blockbuster therapeutic classes such as oncology, cardiovascular, and infectious diseases.

Key points:

  • Many patents are filed for novel chemical entities and therapeutic methods, often leading to crowded landscapes.
  • Secondary patenting (e.g., formulations, delivery systems) is common to extend patent life.
  • The patent life cycle in Japan typically extends 20 years from filing, with potential extensions via orphan drug or pediatric extensions.

Related Patents and Art

Analyzing the patent family reveals prior art references and related filings. For JP4852728, similar patents might exist, covering:

  • Analogous chemical classes
  • Alternative therapeutic uses
  • Different formulations or delivery systems

This landscape presents opportunities for design-around strategies or licensing negotiations.


Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Validity: The patent's validity hinges on prior art searches, especially around the novelty of the chemical compound or therapeutic method.
  • Infringement risks: Companies developing similar drugs must carefully analyze claims to avoid infringement.
  • Patent expiry: Anticipating expiry (usually in 20 years from filing) informs lifecycle management strategies.

Conclusion

JP4852728 represents a potentially broad patent in the pharmaceutical landscape, likely covering a novel active compound, a unique therapeutic method, or both. Its strength depends on claim language, prior art landscape, and strategic use.

Stakeholders should:

  • Conduct detailed claim parsing for potential overlaps.
  • Monitor related patents within Japan’s competitive patent landscape.
  • Leverage the patent's scope for licensing or collaboration, or design around to develop differentiated products.

Key Takeaways

  • Comprehensive claim analysis is essential for evaluating enforceability and scope.
  • Narrower claims provide strong protection but may limit coverage.
  • Prior art searches are critical, especially in crowded therapeutic classes.
  • Lifecycle management involves monitoring potential patent expirations and supplementary filings.
  • Legal counsel should be engaged for detailed patent validity and infringement strategies.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical scope of Japanese pharmaceutical patents like JP4852728?
    They range from broad composition or method claims to narrower formulation or use claims, depending on the applicant’s strategy.

  2. How can I assess the strength of JP4852728?
    By analyzing its claim language, prior art references, and whether it covers a truly novel compound or therapeutic application.

  3. Can similar patents limit the patent's enforceability?
    Yes, overlapping or prior art patents can challenge validity, especially if the claims are broad or lack inventive step.

  4. What are the key considerations for licensing this patent?
    Understanding its claims scope, validity status, and potential infringement issues are critical.

  5. Has JP4852728 been challenged or litigated?
    This depends on its patent prosecution history and post-grant litigations, which require investigation via official patent databases.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO) patent database, official documentation for JP4852728.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) patent documents and related patent family data.
[3] Japanese patent examination guidelines, focusing on pharmaceutical inventions.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.