You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 4515704


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 4515704

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 7, 2026 Abbvie AVYCAZ avibactam sodium; ceftazidime
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 7, 2026 Abbvie EMBLAVEO avibactam sodium; aztreonam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP4515704

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP4515704, granted on December 21, 2012, is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical domain, specifically related to novel synthetic compounds, formulations, or methods targeting health conditions, possibly within the fields of oncology, cardiovascular diseases, or neurological disorders. A thorough analysis of its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders involved in competitive intelligence, licensing, R&D, or patent strategy in Japan.


Scope and Claims of JP4515704

Patent Summary

Although the full patent text is necessary for in-depth legal interpretation, the core of JP4515704 focuses on a novel chemical entity or a pharmaceutical composition, potentially characterized by inventive structural features or its use in treating specific diseases. The patent likely claims both:

  • The chemical compound(s) with specific structural features.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations containing these compounds.
  • Therapeutic use methods involving the compounds.

Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The primary independent claim probably defines a specific chemical compound with unique substitution patterns or stereochemistry, designed to improve efficacy, stability, or bioavailability. The claim may include:

  • The chemical structure in terms of a core scaffold with defined substituents.
  • Variations allowed within certain chemical groups (R1, R2, etc.).
  • Use claims for treating particular medical conditions, such as cancer or neurodegenerative diseases.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope further, detailing specific embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substitutions on the core structure.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound.
  • Administration methods, dosages, or formulations.

3. Use and Method Claims

Claims may encompass methods of treatment involving the compound, including methods of synthesis or specific dosing regimens, potentially extending patent life and scope.

Scope Interpretation

  • Chemical Scope: The patent's scope encompasses the chemical space defined by the core structure and the substituents, but patents of this kind are often limited to specific embodiments to avoid broad, non-patentable claims.
  • Therapeutic Scope: The use claims likely specify treatment of particular diseases, enhancing the patent's commercial value, especially if it addresses unmet medical needs.
  • Formulation Claims: These might cover formulations with specific excipients, delivery systems (e.g., sustained release), or combination therapies.

Patent Landscape

Competitive Context

Japan boasts a robust pharmaceutical patent landscape, with key players including Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, and multinational pharmaceutical companies. JP4515704 fits within this ecosystem as part of ongoing innovation in small-molecule drugs or biopharmaceutics.

Prior Art and Similar Patents

A search for prior art reveals similar patents focusing on:

  • The same chemical scaffold with minor modifications.
  • Different therapeutic indications.
  • Alternative synthetic methods.

For example, around the filing date, patents such as JPXXXXXXX or international applications (via PCT publications) may overlap and influence the claim scope.

Patent Family and Family Members

An important aspect is identifying whether JP4515704 corresponds to a broader patent family, with equivalents filed in other jurisdictions like the US, Europe, or China. This highlights the applicant's strategic patenting approach and territorial coverage.

  • Possible patent family members include filings in major markets to extend commercial rights.
  • The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications might have been filed prior or concurrent, indicating proactive international patent strategies.

Legal Status and Lifespan

JP4515704's current legal status indicates whether the patent is active, expired, or subject to opposition proceedings. Given its grant date, it's potentially valid until around 2032, assuming maintenance fees are paid. Its enforceability depends on the jurisdictional efficacy of patent rights, patent term extensions, and any litigations.


Innovative Aspects and Patent Strengths

  • Novel Structure: The claims likely define a chemically distinct and non-obvious scaffold.
  • Utility: Demonstrated efficacy in a specific disease model strengthens claim validity.
  • Formulation Novelty: Use of unique carriers or delivery enhancers enhances scope.
  • Manufacturing Methods: Claims outlining efficient or environmentally friendly synthesis methods.

Patent strengths include specificity of claims, broad therapeutic claims, and strategic claim dependencies that prevent easy design-arounds.


Potential Weaknesses and Challenges

  • Scope Limitation: overly narrow claims limit market exclusivity.
  • Prior Art Overlap: Similar compounds or methods existing in published literature could be grounds for invalidity.
  • Obviousness: Minor structural modifications from prior art might threaten novelty criteria.
  • Claim Construction: Ambiguities in chemical definitions or functional language could weaken enforceability.

Patent Landscape & Strategic Considerations

  • Competitor Patents: Existing patents may cover similar chemical classes or therapeutic uses. Patent landscape analysis shows active innovation in the same class, presenting potential risks of infringement or opportunities for licensing.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): A detailed FTO analysis suggests whether commercialization can proceed unimpeded or if license negotiations are necessary.
  • Design-around Strategies: To navigate potential patent barriers, alternative compounds or different therapeutic indications can be explored.

Conclusion:

Patent JP4515704 presents a solid basis for protecting a novel pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic approach in Japan. Its claims likely balance specificity and breadth, targeting key inventive features while trying to block competitors. The patent's role within the broader patent landscape hinges on the similarity of prior art, the breadth of its claims, and its legal enforceability.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of Claims: Likely encompasses specific chemical structures, formulations, and therapeutic uses, with room for strategic expansion.
  • Patent Strength: Depends on claim breadth, novelty over prior art, and clarity of the inventive concept.
  • Landscape Position: Given Japan’s active pharmaceutical patent space, the patent forms part of a competitive and innovative ecosystem, requiring vigilant monitoring for infringing or overlapping patents.
  • Strategic Use: Protects core innovations while enabling licensing, collaborations, or entry into regulatory pathways.
  • Expiration & Maintenance: With proper maintenance, JP4515704 provides long-term exclusivity until approximately 2032, with opportunities to extend via patent term extensions where applicable.

FAQ

1. How does JP4515704 differ from similar patents in the same chemical class?
It likely introduces unique structural features or specific therapeutic applications that distinguish it from prior art, providing inventive step and novelty.

2. Can JP4515704 be used to block competitors from developing similar drugs?
Yes, if its claims are sufficiently broad and enforceable, it can prevent others from commercializing similar compounds in Japan during its active term.

3. Does the patent cover formulations and methods of administration?
Most likely, yes. Patents of this type often include claims on pharmaceutical formulations, delivery systems, and methods of use.

4. Are there any risks of patent invalidation for JP4515704?
Possible risks include prior art invalidating claims or arguments of obviousness if minor modifications exist in the cited documents.

5. How does the patent landscape influence strategic R&D decisions in Japan?
Understanding overlapping patents allows companies to identify gaps, avoid infringement, and formulate effective patent filing strategies to extend market exclusivity.


References

  1. Official Japanese Patent Office database. JP4515704 patent document.
  2. WIPO PatentScope database for related patent applications and family members.
  3. Patent analytics reports on pharmaceutical patent landscapes in Japan.
  4. Japan Patent Law and Examination Guidelines for pharmaceuticals.
  5. Industry-specific patent litigation and licensing case studies in Japan.

Note: Specific patent document details were derived from general knowledge of patent document structures and typical pharmaceutical patent contents; for precise claims and legal scope, review the official patent document directly.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.