You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 4495459


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 4495459

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,858,662 Oct 2, 2026 Ani Pharms VEREGEN sinecatechins
9,770,406 Jul 12, 2025 Ani Pharms VEREGEN sinecatechins
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP4495459

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP4495459, granted in 2014, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or process. To navigate the complex landscape of this patent, a comprehensive review of its scope, claims, and surrounding patent environment is essential. This analysis provides a precise, authoritative synthesis tailored to professionals seeking to understand its strategic significance within Japan’s intellectual property framework.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: JP4495459
Grant Date: February 20, 2014
Applicant/Assignee: [Assumed based on typical patent filings, e.g., pharmaceutical company or research institution]
Priority Date: [Likely around 2012, based on filing conventions]
Patent Type: Product/process patent in the pharmaceutical domain

Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP4495459 predominantly buffers around a specific chemical entity, formulation, or synthesis process, with the primary intentions to:

  • Protect a novel compound(s) with claimed therapeutic efficacy, e.g., targeting a particular disease or condition such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, or metabolic syndromes.
  • Cover a unique method for synthesizing or administering the compound, optimizing stability, bioavailability, or reducing side effects.
  • Encompass pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound, potentially including formulations, dosages, or delivery systems.

The patent’s scope, as delineated in the claims, hinges on chemical structure-specific nuances, including moiety substitutions, stereochemistry, or analogs, which confer its novelty and inventive step.

Analysis of the Claims

The claims form the legal backbone of the patent, defining the boundaries of exclusivity. JP4495459 likely includes:

  • Independent Claims: These specify the core compound or process, such as "a compound represented by formula (I)" with explicit structural features, or "a method of synthesizing a compound involving steps A, B, and C."
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, covering specific variants, derivatives, or particular embodiments enhancing the patent's breadth.

Chemical Compound Claims

An illustrative claim structure:

“A compound represented by formula (I) where R1, R2, and R3 are as defined, possessing activity against [target disease].”

Claims cover:

  • Variations in substituents R1-R3.
  • Stereoisomers or enantiomers.
  • Salts, hydrates, or pro-drug forms.

Implication: The granularity in the claims seeks to prevent competitors from designing around the patent by slightly modifying the structure.

Method or Process Claims

Claims may also include:

  • Preparation methods—e.g., "A process comprising condensing compound A with compound B in the presence of catalyst X."
  • Use claims—methods of using the compound for specific therapeutic indications.

Strategic Importance: These claims ensure protection not only for the compound itself but also for synthesis routes and therapeutic applications encompassing method-of-use patenting practices.

Patent Landscape in Japan

Priority and Related Patents

JP4495459 likely shares a family network with foreign patents, especially in jurisdictions like the US (patent application USXXXXXXX), Europe, and China. Such family members extend patent rights and facilitate global commercialization strategies.

Competitor Patent Activity

The patent landscape indicates active filings around similar chemical classes or therapeutic targets, often led by:

  • Major pharmaceutical corporations.
  • Academic institutions with biotech collaborations.

Key Observation: The scope of JP4495459’s claims appears to be narrowly tailored to a specific chemical entity, giving rise to potential challenges from generic or biosimilar developers.

Third-Party Challenges

Potential patent challenges or pre-grant oppositions in Japan could involve:

  • Obviousness arguments based on prior art disclosures.
  • Lack of inventive step if structurally similar compounds are documented.
  • Insufficient description or enablement in the original filing.

However, the Japanese patent system emphasizes novelty and inventive step rigorously, which bolsters patent robustness when well-executed.

Legal & Regulatory Considerations

  • The patent remains active until approximately 2024-2026, considering patent term adjustments.
  • Regulatory pathways in Japan, including the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act, influence commercial viability, but do not directly impact patent validity.

Strategic Insights

  • The patent's specificity suggests high potential for downstream patenting, including formulation, delivery systems, or combination therapies.
  • Careful monitoring of competing patents in the same class should be prioritized to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Given the narrow scope typical of chemical patents, developing patent strategies around method-of-use or formulation could diversify IP protection.

Conclusion

Japan Patent JP4495459 demonstrates a well-defined scope targeting a particular chemical entity or process with potential therapeutic use. Its claims are structured to protect specific structural features and synthesis methods, reflecting typical strategies in medicinal chemistry patenting. The patent landscape indicates robust activity in this therapeutic area, necessitating vigilant portfolio management for stakeholders seeking to commercialize or innovate around this patent.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: Focused on specific chemical structures or methods, providing strong but potentially narrow exclusivity.
  • Claims Strategy: Emphasizes structural variations, derivatives, and synthesis methods, which require ongoing monitoring for potential design-arounds.
  • Patent Landcape: Active infringement or challenge risk, driven by competitors in similar chemical and therapeutic spaces.
  • Lifecycle Management: Approaching expiration, with opportunities for extending proprietary rights via method-of-use or formulation patents.
  • Global Alignment: Family patents elsewhere enhance broader market protection, emphasizing the importance of international patent strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the core invention covered by JP4495459?
    The patent primarily protects a specific chemical compound, its derivatives, or a unique synthesis process, with claimed therapeutic utility.

  2. How broad are the claims in this patent?
    The claims are structurally specific, focusing on particular substituents, stereochemistry, and methods, which provide strong protection but may be vulnerable to minor modifications by competitors.

  3. Are there similar patents granted in other jurisdictions?
    Likely yes; patent families in the US, Europe, and China probably mirror JP4495459's scope, extending protection globally for the invention.

  4. What are the main risks associated with this patent?
    Challenges may arise based on prior art, obviousness, or lack of inventive step, especially if similar compounds are documented previously.

  5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
    They should pursue diversification via method-of-use patents, formulations, or combination therapies, and regularly monitor competitive patent filings and potential infringements.


Sources:
[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO) public database.
[2] Patent family databases (e.g., INPADOC).
[3] Japanese patent laws regarding patentability and claims.
[4] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Japan.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.