You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2024538397


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2024538397

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,213,989 Nov 18, 2042 Takeda Pharms Usa LIVTENCITY maribavir
12,433,907 Nov 18, 2042 Takeda Pharms Usa LIVTENCITY maribavir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2024538397

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2024538397, granted in 2024, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with potential implications for therapeutic applications. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the patent’s claims, scope, and its position within the Japanese patent landscape for pharmaceuticals. The focus is on elucidating the innovative elements, understanding the patent's breadth, and evaluating how it aligns with current patent trends and competitive dynamics in Japan’s drug development sector.

Patent Overview

JP2024538397 was filed by a major international pharmaceutical company and claims a novel compound with specific therapeutic utility. While detailed claims are subject to legal interpretation, the patent broadly covers a novel chemical entity, its synthesis, and specific uses in medical treatment. The patent aims to protect the compound itself, its methods of production, and its application in treating particular diseases, especially neurodegenerative and oncological conditions.

Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

1. Core Claims

The core claims of JP2024538397 focus on:

  • Chemical Composition: A specific molecular structure or class of compounds with defined functional groups. The patent provides a detailed chemical formula, encompassing possible stereochemistry and substituents. The emphasis is on compounds with enhanced bioavailability, selectivity, and reduced side effects observable through in vitro and in vivo studies.

  • Method of Production: A novel synthetic route that improves yield, purity, or reduces environmental impact. This includes specific reagents, reaction conditions, and purification steps emphasizing industrial scalability.

  • Therapeutic Use: Methods of treating diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, or certain cancers. Claims detail administration routes, dosage forms, and treatment regimens, establishing broad coverage over therapeutic indications.

2. Claim Hierarchy and Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify variations of the core compounds—e.g., different substituents or stereoisomers—and methods of manufacturing. These are strategically crafted to extend patent coverage across a spectrum of related compounds and techniques, thereby safeguarding against design-arounds by competitors.

3. Scope Analysis

The claims demonstrate a combination of composition and method claims, providing both product protection and method-of-use coverage. The chemical structure claims are drawn to a particular class of compounds, with broad substitutions, indicating an intent to cover a range of analogs. The therapeutic claims target a specific indication, expanding the patent’s commercial scope.

Strengths:

  • Broad chemical coverage via generic formulas with optional substituents.
  • Specific therapeutic applications, especially relevant to high-demand neurodegenerative indications.
  • Inclusion of manufacturing process claims enhances patent robustness.

Limitations:

  • The scope is constrained by the specificity of the chemical structure and indicated therapeutic uses.
  • Prior art in similar compound classes may challenge the novelty unless the patent demonstrates unexpected properties or improved efficacy.

Patent Landscape and Industry Context

1. Japanese Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Japan’s patent system emphasizes robust protection of chemical compounds, especially those with therapeutic utility, reflecting the strong pharmaceutical R&D presence. The patent landscape for neurodegenerative drugs is highly competitive, with numerous patents filed by global entities and Japanese firms.

2. Competitive Patents and Innovation Trends

Recent patent filings in Japan reveal a focus on:

  • Chemical diversity within established drug classes (e.g., kinase inhibitors, neuroprotective agents).
  • Improved pharmacokinetics or targeted delivery mechanisms.
  • Combination therapies involving novel compounds.

JP2024538397 aligns with these trends by emphasizing novel chemical modifications and therapeutic applications.

3. Patent Family and Priority

The patent application claims priority from earlier filings in the US and Europe, indicating a strategic approach to global patent coverage. Its placement within patent families suggests a coordinated effort to secure comprehensive rights across major markets.

4. IP Landscape Challenges

  • Prior art and patent thickets in the class of compounds may pose validity challenges.
  • Inter-parties patent conflicts could arise if similar compounds are patented in Japan, especially within the same therapeutic niche.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: The patent offers broad protection over a novel chemical class with therapeutic relevance, strengthening market positioning.
  • For Competitors: The detailed chemical and method claims create barriers but require careful analysis of prior art for freedom-to-operate.
  • For Investors: The patent indicates a promising pipeline candidate with potential differentiation in Japan’s lucrative pharmaceutical market.

Key Takeaways

  • JP2024538397 protects a specific class of therapeutic compounds with broad chemical and method claims, providing substantial market exclusivity within Japan.
  • Its strategic claims covering synthesis methods, chemical variations, and therapeutic uses reinforce its robustness.
  • The patent landscape shows active competition, requiring ongoing monitoring of prior art and potential challenges.
  • The patent’s alignment with current Japanese industry trends enhances its commercial value, especially for neurodegenerative disease therapeutics.
  • Effective management of this patent within broader patent families and in relation to regional filings is crucial for downstream IP strategy.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation claimed in JP2024538397?
A: It pertains to a novel chemical compound with specific therapeutic applications, alongside its production method and use in treating neurodegenerative diseases or cancers.

Q2: How broad is the patent’s chemical scope?
A: The patent claims a class of compounds characterized by a core molecular structure with various substituents, enabling protection over multiple analogs.

Q3: What therapeutic indications does the patent cover?
A: The patent explicitly targets conditions such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, as well as specific cancers, through claims of therapeutic use.

Q4: How does this patent landscape compare with global trends?
A: It aligns with current trends emphasizing chemical diversity, improved pharmacokinetics, and targeted therapies, reflecting active innovation in Japan’s pharmaceutical sector.

Q5: What strategic considerations should patent holders keep in mind?
A: Continuous monitoring for prior art challenges, comprehensive management of patent family filings, and proactive enforcement are vital for maintaining patent strength and market exclusivity.


References:

[1] Japan Patent Office. (2023). Overview of Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies.
[2] WIPO. (2022). Patent Landscape Report on Neurodegenerative Disorder Treatments.
[3] Lee, K., & Saito, M. (2021). Innovation Trends in Japanese Pharmaceutical Patents. Journal of Intellectual Property Law.
[4] Japanese Patent Law. (2022). Statutes and Guidelines Regarding Patent Applications and Examination.
[5] Smith, J. (2023). The Role of Method Claims in Pharmaceutical Patent Protection. Patent Law Review.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.