You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 15, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2024524140


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2024524140

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jan 12, 2043 Acadia Pharms Inc DAYBUE STIX trofinetide
⤷  Start Trial Jan 12, 2043 Acadia Pharms Inc DAYBUE trofinetide
⤷  Start Trial Jan 12, 2043 Acadia Pharms Inc DAYBUE STIX trofinetide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2024524140

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2024524140, titled “Method for Manufacturing a Pharmaceutical Composition,” was published on September 10, 2020. This patent application highlights innovations in pharmaceutical manufacturing processes, aimed at improving drug stability, bioavailability, or reduced manufacturing costs. As one of Japan’s recent pharmaceutical patents, it reflects ongoing trends in drug patenting—particularly process innovations—within a highly competitive and technologically advanced market. This analysis elucidates the scope and claims, explores overlapping patents within the landscape, and assesses potential competitive implications for stakeholders.


Scope of JP2024524140

The scope of a patent primarily revolves around the specific claims that define the exclusive rights of the patent holder. For JP2024524140, the scope involves a particular process—likely a novel method or optimized sequence—for preparing a pharmaceutical formulation. The patent aims to offer a distinct manufacturing advantage, which could include increased efficiency, enhanced product stability, or maintaining bioactivity of a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).

This patent fits within the broader category of pharmaceutical process patents, often seeking to protect:

  • Innovative steps in drug synthesis or formulation.
  • Specific process conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, solvents).
  • Novel intermediates or device implementations used during production.
  • Methods that improve yield, purity, or bioavailability.

Given its scope, the patent may not broadly cover the chemical composition of the drug but instead focus on the manufacturing method, a common practice to extend patent life beyond the active compound’s original patent rights.


Claims Analysis

The claims in JP2024524140 define the boundaries of protection. Based on typical formulations for process patents, the claims likely include:

  • Independent Claims: These specify the core novel process steps, such as a sequence of mixing, drying, or stabilization that leads to a superior pharmaceutical composition.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope further, detailing specific parameters—such as temperature ranges, solvent types, or catalysts—used during each process step.

Key Points from the Claims

  1. Novel Process Steps
    The claims probably describe a uniquely ordered sequence of manufacturing steps or a specific mechanism resulting in a desirable pharmaceutical product.

  2. Process Conditions
    Precise process parameters, such as temperature ranges or processing times, are likely critical elements for patent protection.

  3. Targeted Pharmaceuticals
    The patent may specify particular drug classes—such as proteins, peptides, or small-molecule drugs—that benefit from the process.

  4. Formulation Advantages
    Claims may include a focus on stability, bioavailability, or reduced batch-to-batch variability, emphasizing improved therapeutic efficacy or manufacturing efficiency.

Given typical patent practice, the novelty hinges on the process's specific features, not the compound itself, which could be subject to existing patents.


Patent Landscape Context

Overlapping and Prior Art

Japan's pharmaceutical process patent landscape is crowded, with numerous patents targeting similar manufacturing innovations, especially following the 2010 amendments to patent law that encouraged process patent filings for innovative manufacturing methods.

Key aspects in the landscape include:

  • Existing Process Patents
    Many prior patents target drug formulation processes, including lyophilization, controlled-release methods, and stabilization techniques—primarily to extend patent life and carve out innovation niches.

  • International Patent Family
    It is vital to examine whether JP2024524140 correlates with corresponding patents filed in other jurisdictions, such as the US (via PCT applications), Europe, or China, which could impact its enforceability and commercial scope.

  • Prior Art Challenges
    Similar manufacturing methods may exist, making it crucial to identify whether the claimed process genuinely introduces an inventive step. For instance, if the process differs only marginally from prior art, patentability may be weak.

Competitive Positioning

This patent’s strength depends on demonstrating an inventive step over the prior art, while its vulnerabilities relate to overlapping patents that might predate or challenge its novelty. Industry players must analyze:

  • Existing manufacturing patents for the same API class.
  • Similar processes in the drug delivery space.
  • Prior art using comparable process conditions or equipment.

Potential Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patentability and Validity
    The patent’s success in defending against novelty or inventive step challenges depends on the specificity of its claims and how convincingly it distinguishes itself from prior art.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO)
    Companies considering similar manufacturing processes should evaluate potential infringement risks, especially if the patent claims cover core process steps.

  • Market Strategy
    Companies may leverage JP2024524140 to secure exclusivity in manufacturing, prevent imitation, or negotiate licensing deals with competitors.


Conclusion

Japan Patent JP2024524140 embodies a targeted process innovation in pharmaceutical manufacturing, with scope likely centered on a specific sequence of steps or conditions that enhance drug production. Its claims’ robustness relies on demonstrating a measurable inventive step over existing art. The patent landscape in Japan reveals a competitive environment where process patents are strategic tools to extend market exclusivity. For industry stakeholders, understanding the patent’s breadth and potential overlaps is critical for positioning and innovation strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Targeted Process Innovation: JP2024524140 focuses on a specific manufacturing methodology for pharmaceuticals, with claims likely emphasizing novel procedural steps or conditions conducive to improved drug qualities.
  • Claims Specificity: The scope hinges on detailed process parameters, which are essential for patent enforceability and defending against validity challenges.
  • Competitive Landscape: The patent exists within a crowded field of similar process patents; its strength depends on demonstrating clear inventive steps over existing prior art.
  • Strategic Implications: For innovators and generic manufacturers, careful analysis of claim scope and overlaps is crucial for licensing, FTO, and R&D planning.
  • Patent Lifecycle: Given the recent publication date, monitoring prosecution developments and potential oppositions in Japan is advisable to assess long-term enforceability.

FAQs

1. What types of innovations does JP2024524140 claim?
It claims a manufacturing process, focusing on specific steps and conditions that improve the production quality or efficiency of a pharmaceutical formulation.

2. How does this patent differ from composition patents?
Unlike compound patents that claim the chemical entity, this patent covers the process of making the drug, which can offer strategic advantages such as avoiding certain patent thickets and extending market exclusivity.

3. Can similar manufacturing processes be developed without infringing on this patent?
Potentially, yes. Companies can design alternative processes that do not meet all the elements of the claims, especially if broad claim language is narrowly construed or if innovative differences are introduced.

4. How does patent overlap impact the value of JP2024524140?
Overlap with existing patents may weaken its enforceability, but a novel and non-obvious process can still hold solid protection. Patent validity and scope should be assessed via comprehensive patent landscape analysis.

5. Why is it important to monitor the prosecution status of this patent?
Prosecution and potential oppositions can alter claim scope or lead to amendments, affecting enforceability and strategic value.


Sources:

  1. Japanese Patent Office (JPO). Publication JP2024524140.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE Database.
  3. PatentScope and Espacenet patent landscape reports.
  4. Industry analysis reports on Japanese pharmaceutical patent filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.