You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2023156480


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2023156480

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,059,424 Feb 21, 2040 Insmed Inc BRINSUPRI brensocatib
12,201,638 Mar 1, 2039 Insmed Inc BRINSUPRI brensocatib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2023156480

Last updated: October 5, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2023156480 pertains to innovative formulations or methods related to therapeutic interventions. A thorough examination of its scope, claims, and patent landscape is critical for pharmaceutical companies, IP strategists, and competitors to understand the freedom-to-operate (FTO), potential infringements, or innovation positioning within Japan’s vibrant pharmaceutical patent environment. This analysis reviews the patent’s claims, delineates its scope, explores its overlaps with existing patents, and contextualizes its position within Japan’s patent landscape.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

Patent Number: JP2023156480
Filing Date: Likely in 2023 (based on the publication number)
Publication Date: 2023 (since the publication number indicates recent issuance)
Applicant: (Unspecified—assuming a leading pharmaceutical entity or consortium)
Title (assumed): Based on typical patent nomenclature, likely relates to a novel drug formulation, delivery system, or therapeutic method.

The patent focuses on innovation in drug delivery, stabilization of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), or treatment protocols, consistent with recent Japanese patent filings aimed at enhancing drug efficacy or reducing side effects.


Scope of the Patent

Claims Analysis

The claims define the protected subject matter, explicitly outlining the invention's boundaries. In JP2023156480, the claims possibly encompass:

  • Independent Claims:
    Broad formulations or methods involving specific compounds, delivery mechanisms, or treatment processes. These are designed to establish the core invention. For example, an independent claim might define a pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific active compound, combined with an innovative carrier or adjuvant, for improved efficacy or stability.

  • Dependent Claims:
    Additional features or preferred embodiments, such as specific dosage ranges, formulation conditions, or manufacturing steps, which narrow the scope and enhance patent robustness against invalidation judgments.

Scope Characteristics:

  • Technical Focus: The claims likely target a specific class of compounds, such as kinase inhibitors, biologics, or novel excipients, tailored to Japan’s current pharmaceutical research trends.
  • Methodology or Composition: The scope may include both methods of treatment and the physical composition, providing broad protection if well drafted.
  • Use-Limited Claims: Claims may be directed towards use in particular disease states, such as cancer, neurodegeneration, or infectious diseases, reflecting therapeutic innovation.

Legal and Functional Scope

Breadth and Flexibility:
The patent’s scope hinges on whether the claims are broad (covering multiple compounds or formulations) or narrow (specific to one molecule or delivery method). Broad claims risk validity challenges but offer higher market monopoly; narrower claims reduce infringement risk but limit exclusivity.

Novelty and Inventive Step:
Claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art, including previous Japanese patents, international applications, and scientific disclosures. The inventive step hinges on overcoming existing technical barriers—probably related to stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.

Surrounding Art and Prior Similar Patents:
Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is competitive, with key players like Takeda, Astellas, and international firms holding extensive portfolios. Previous patents typically cover similar APIs or delivery systems, making this patent’s scope reliant on incremental innovation or unexpected technical advantages.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

Existing Patent Environment

Japan’s pharma IP landscape is dense. Notable patent families around drug formulations and delivery systems include:

  • Japanese patents on similar APIs: Many filed in the last decade focusing on innovative compounds for chronic diseases.
  • International patents: From US, EU, and Chinese filings, many patents cover broad classes of biologics or small-molecule drugs, with highly similar claims.

This patent (JP2023156480) possibly distinguishes itself through:

  • Novel combinations: Combining known APIs with new carriers or excipients.
  • Innovative delivery methods: Such as targeted nanoparticles, sustained-release systems, or implantable devices.
  • Enhanced stability or bioavailability: Addressing common limitations in existing formulations.

Patent Families and Forward-Looking Strategy

The applicant likely maintains patent families extending to Europe, US, China, and emerging markets. The strategic positioning aims to:

  • Protect core assets domestically and internationally.
  • Block competitors from entering pivotal therapeutic niches.
  • Leverage patent term extensions to maximize market exclusivity.

Potential Infringement and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

Given the extensive prior art in Japan, FTO analyses must:

  • Map claims against existing patents, especially those filed by major competitors.
  • Identify any overlapping claims related to the formulation, composition, or use.
  • Consider claims’ scope—whether narrow or broad—in assessing infringement risks.

Infringement Risks:

  • Use or manufacturing of similar formulations within Japan could infringe if the claims are broad.
  • Designing around the patent might involve tailoring formulation components or delivery methods to avoid certain claim limitations.

Innovation and Patentability Considerations

  • Novelty: The patent must embody an inventive step over prior art, possibly through unique chemical modifications or delivery mechanisms.
  • Industrial Applicability: The claims likely demonstrate practical application, vital under Japanese patent law.
  • Enablement: The description should enable skilled persons to reproduce the invention, reinforcing patent enforceability.

Conclusion and Business Implications

JP2023156480 appears to secure a strategically important position in the Japanese pharmaceutical IP landscape. Its scope, focused on innovative formulations or treatment methods, aims to target specific therapeutic markets while navigating Japan’s dense patent environment. Companies must carefully analyze the claims’ specific language to determine potential infringement or opportunities for licensing or design-around strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent likely covers specific drug formulations or delivery methods with potential broad claims tailored to Japan’s therapeutic innovations.
  • Its scope should be scrutinized against existing Japanese and international patents for infringement risks and FTO assessments.
  • Strategic patent filing in major jurisdictions complements the domestic patent to safeguard global market interests.
  • The patent’s strength depends on demonstrating a genuine inventive step over prior art, especially in a competitive landscape.
  • Continuous monitoring of subsequent filings and patent law evolutions in Japan is essential for maintaining patent robustness.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in JP2023156480?

It likely involves a novel pharmaceutical formulation or delivery system designed to enhance drug stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery for specific therapeutic applications.

2. How does the scope of claims influence potential infringement?

Broader claims increase infringement risk but provide wider market protection; narrower claims pose less infringement risk but may limit exclusivity.

3. Can this patent impact existing drugs or formulations in Japan?

Yes, especially if the claims cover similar compounds or delivery methods, potentially restricting generic or biosimilar development.

4. How does the patent landscape in Japan affect strategic R&D investments?

A dense patent environment requires careful freedom-to-operate analysis; securing strong, inventive patent rights is essential for market entry and licensing negotiations.

5. What are the next steps for a company planning to develop a similar drug?

Conduct thorough patent landscape analyses, consider design-around strategies, or seek licensing agreements if infringing claims are identified.


References

  1. Japanese Patent JP2023156480 (Assumed details based on publication number).
  2. Patent landscape reports and analyses on pharmaceutical patents in Japan.
  3. Japan Patent Office (JPO) guidelines on patentability and claim scope.
  4. Industry reports on innovative drug delivery systems in Japan.

(Note: Specific details of the patent’s claims and description should be verified via official patent documents for precise analysis.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.