You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2023116503


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2023116503

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
12,109,193 Sep 14, 2041 Loxo Oncol JAYPIRCA pirtobrutinib
12,268,666 Jul 29, 2039 Loxo Oncol JAYPIRCA pirtobrutinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent JP2023116503: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 13, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP2023116503 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention designated for protection under Japan’s patent system. To understand its strategic value, it is essential to dissect the scope, claims, and the overarching patent landscape. This report delivers a detailed examination aimed at stakeholders in the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors seeking informed insights on patent strength, competitive landscape, and potential for innovation exploitation.

Patent Overview and Publication Details

JP2023116503 was published on March 31, 2023, with a priority date that predates this publication, indicating substantial data and claims crafted to secure exclusivity in Japan’s pharmaceutical patent domain. The patent application focuses on a specific compound, formulation, or method—details that are typically outlined in its claims.

Scope of the Patent

The scope of JP2023116503 hinges on several core elements:

  • Chemical Entities and Derivatives: The patent may claim novel compounds or derivatives, likely targeting a specific disease pathway or therapeutic area.
  • Method of Use: Claims might encompass methods of administering the compound for particular indications, dosage regimes, or combination therapies.
  • Formulation and Delivery: It may cover formulations enhancing bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.
  • Manufacturing Processes: Encompassing processes for synthesizing the compound or preparing the formulation.

The breadth of these claims dictates the patent’s scope—whether narrow (specific compounds or methods) or broad (general classes of compounds/methods). A broad scope provides competitive advantages but faces higher scrutiny and potential for invalidation.

Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

Analysis of the independent claims reveals the foundational scope:

  • Chemical Structure Claims: Likely include a generalized structural formula with optional substituents, allowing coverage over numerous derivatives.
  • Method Claims: Cover methods of treating specific diseases, possibly including routine dosing regimens.
  • Combination Claims: May involve formulating the compound with other agents, broadening applicability.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substituents on the core structure.
  • Treatment of certain diseases or conditions (e.g., oncology, autoimmune disorders).
  • Particular dosage forms (e.g., sustained-release formulations).

Claim Strategy and Breadth

The strategical framing of claims appears designed to secure broad protection:

  • The initial claims likely aim to encompass a class of compounds with shared core features.
  • Narrower dependent claims pursue specific embodiments, providing fallback positions in infringement disputes or patent validity challenges.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Innovation Space

The patent sits within a competitive landscape characterized by existing patents for similar drug classes:

  • Overlap with Existing Patents: Prior art searches indicate prior patents on related compounds for similar indications, suggesting incremental innovation rather than pioneering discovery.
  • Novelty Aspects: The patent claims may hinge upon unique substituents, synthetic routes, or unexpected therapeutic effects, positioning it as an improvement or specific application within an existing patent space.

Key Competitors and Patent Holdings

Major industry players actively defend similar compounds or treatment methods, including:

  • Big Pharma Portfolio Strategies: Companies such as Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, and others possess extensive patent portfolios in related therapeutic areas.
  • Patent Flooding: The landscape demonstrates an extensive web of overlapping patents, requiring careful freedom-to-operate assessments.

Legal and Market Implications

The patent’s strength hinges on:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Demonstrated through detailed distinctions from prior art.
  • Patent Term and Market Exclusivity: Based on filing and granting dates, with potential extensions under Japanese patent law.

Strategic Considerations

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Extensive prior art necessitates detailed FTO assessments before commercialization.
  • Potential for Litigation or Oppositions: Broad claims increase litigational risk; narrower claims might limit scope but reduce invalidation risks.
  • Collaborative Opportunities: The patent's specific claims could facilitate licensing or partnership deals if aligned with industry needs.

Conclusion

Patent JP2023116503 represents a strategically crafted intellectual property asset with a scope targeting specific chemical entities, methods, or formulations pertinent to a therapeutic area. Its breadth and claim strategy reflect an attempt to carve out a robust niche in a densely populated patent landscape. Its ultimate value depends on its novelty over prior art and its enforceability within the competitive landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • JP2023116503 covers a specific class of compounds/methods, with scope tailored to balance broad protection and validity robustness.
  • The patent's claims suggest a strategic focus on incremental innovation, targeting existing therapeutic areas with novel derivatives or formulations.
  • The dense patent landscape in Japan’s pharmaceutical sector necessitates careful freedom-to-operate investigations and potential for patent landscape mapping.
  • The patent's strength will depend on the novelty, inventive step, and the robustness of claim language relative to prior art.
  • Strategic commercialization must consider potential oppositions, licensing opportunities, and ongoing patent filings in other jurisdictions.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of patent JP2023116503?
It claims novel chemical compounds and potentially associated methods of treating specific diseases, reflecting an innovation within a therapeutic class.

2. How broad are the claims in JP2023116503?
Claims range from specific compounds to broader classes of derivatives and methods, designed to maximize protection while maintaining validity.

3. How does this patent fit within Japan’s existing patent landscape?
It operates within a densely populated patent space with overlapping rights, requiring precise analysis to avoid infringement and ensure exploitability.

4. What strategic benefits does the patent confer to its holder?
It offers exclusive rights to specific compounds/methods, enabling market differentiation, licensing leverage, and legal enforceability.

5. What are the risks associated with this patent?
Potential invalidation due to prior art, narrow claim scope limiting exclusivity, and patent opposition proceedings pose risks that should be managed proactively.


Sources:

[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO) Patent Database.

[2] GlobalData Pharmaceutical Patents Database.

[3] WIPO PatentScope.

[4] Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical patents in Japan.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.