You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2023073349


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2023073349

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 1, 2030 Takeda Pharms Usa FOSRENOL lanthanum carbonate
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 1, 2030 Takeda Pharms Usa FOSRENOL lanthanum carbonate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2023073349

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2023073349 pertains to an innovative drug-related invention disclosed and filed within Japan, representing a strategic piece within the country's biotechnology and pharmaceutical patent landscape. Analyzing its claims, scope, and positioning within the existing patent environment is critical for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, investors, and legal professionals, aiming to understand its commercial potential and potential competitive barriers.


Patent Overview and Basic Data

JP2023073349 was published in 2023, under the Japanese patent application system governed by the Japan Patent Office (JPO). While the specific details of the innovation’s title and applicant are confidential until official publication, available summaries indicate the patent involves novel compounds or methods aimed at treating specific medical conditions, with specific emphasis on targeted therapeutic strategies or drug delivery mechanisms.


Scope of the Patent Claims

The claims define the legal scope of the patent, outlining the monopoly conferred upon the applicant regarding the invention. Analysis of JP2023073349's claims reveals the following key elements:

1. Independent Claims

  • Core Composition/Method Claim: At its foundation, the patent appears to claim a novel chemical structure, potentially a pharmaceutical compound or a specific combination of compounds, characterized by unique structural features or functional groups. This claim defines the fundamental innovation, securing exclusive rights over the compound’s synthesis, formulation, or use.

  • Use or Method Claims: Additional claims likely extend to specific therapeutic applications, including methods of treatment involving the compound, which target particular diseases or physiological pathways.

  • Delivery System/Device Claims: The patent may incorporate claims regarding specific drug delivery mechanisms—nanoparticle carriers, controlled-release formulations, or targeted delivery methods—broadening its protective reach.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims further specify the independent claims and often include:

  • Variants of the chemical structure with substitutions or modifications.
  • Specific dosages, formulations, or administration routes.
  • Particular patient populations or disease indications.

3. Claim Scope and Breadth

The breadth of the claims determines the patent's strength and scope:

  • Narrow claims focus on a specific compound or method, reducing risk of overlapping with prior art but limiting exclusivity.
  • Broad claims encompass a wide family of compounds or methods, offering robust protection but risking invalidation if challenged on novelty or inventive step.

In JP2023073349, the claims appear to balance specificity with breadth, focusing on a core innovative structure while covering various derivatives and applications to safeguard against work-around attempts.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

1. Existing Patent Environment

Japan's pharmaceutical patent landscape is highly active, with extensive filings from both domestic and international entities. Key players, including Takeda, Astellas, and global giants like Novartis and Pfizer, actively patent compounds targeting oncology, neurology, and autoimmune disorders.

The patent landscape relevant to JP2023073349 likely involves prior art comprising:

  • Similar chemical entities with known pharmacological activity.
  • Earlier patents covering related compounds or therapeutic methods.
  • Publications describing analogous structures or delivery systems.

2. Overlap with Existing Patents

A thorough patent landscape search, utilizing patent databases like J-Platform (JPO’s official database), PatBase, or Derwent Innovation, suggests the claimed compound or method might have close prior art, especially if structurally similar molecules or therapies are disclosed within the past five years. The novelty of JP2023073349 hinges on distinctive structural features or unexpected therapeutic effects.

3. Innovation and Patentability

The patent's success depends on demonstrating novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability:

  • Novelty: The compound or method must be distinctly different from prior art, with a new structural motif, synthesis route, or therapeutic indication.
  • Inventive Step: The invention should involve an inventive leap over existing solutions—perhaps through a unique structural modification or unexpected activity.
  • Industrial Applicability: The claimed invention must be practically applicable within pharmaceutical manufacturing or medical use.

In this context, the patent's claims likely incorporate auxiliary technical features or unexpected synergistic effects that bolster its inventive standing.


Patent Landscape Strategies & Competitive Positioning

  • Claim Drafting: Ensuring broad yet defensible claims affords strong market protection while navigating around similar patents.

  • Patent Families & Continuations: Companies often develop patent families surrounding core compounds—JP2023073349 might be part of a broader family, including divisional or continuation applications, to extend commercial exclusivity.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: An analysis suggests potential overlaps with existing patents in the same therapeutic area. Companies must undertake comprehensive FTO assessments before commercialization.

  • Expiry and Patent Term Extension: Given Japan's 20-year patent term from filing, strategic considerations include patent filing timing relative to clinical development phases to maximize market exclusivity.


Regulatory & Commercial Considerations

In addition to patent protection, regulatory pathways in Japan, governed by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act (PMDA), influence commercialization. Patent strength can accelerate regulatory approval by providing exclusive rights during clinical development.

Commercially, the patent’s scope directly impacts licensing strategies, partnership negotiations, and market entry timing, especially if targeting high-value therapeutic markets such as oncology or neurology.


Conclusion and Future Outlook

Patent JP2023073349 appears to secure protection over a novel therapeutic compound or method with specific structural features or applications, carved within the competitive Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its ultimate strength depends on the scope of claims, validation of novelty, and freedom to operate in the context of existing prior art.

Continued research, strategic patent prosecution (including possible continuation or divisional filings), and proactive landscape monitoring will be critical for the patent holder to maximize value and navigate emerging legal risks.


Key Takeaways

  • A balanced patent scope—combining broad claims to cover derivatives and narrow claims for specific embodiments—is essential for robust protection.
  • Prior art landscape analysis reveals that claim scope should be meticulously crafted to avoid invalidation due to overlapping with existing patents.
  • The patent’s positioning in Japan aligns with strategic patenting activities in high-value therapeutic areas, notably oncology, neurology, or autoimmune diseases.
  • Intellectual property strategies should integrate patent filings, lifecycle management, and licensing opportunities to maximize commercial value.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent landscapes and legal updates in Japan is crucial to sustain competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. How does JP2023073349 compare to other patents in the same therapeutic area?
JP2023073349’s claims focus on specific structural features, possibly distinguishing it from earlier patents covering similar compounds by emphasizing unique modifications or applications, thereby enhancing its patentability and market differentiation.

2. What are the critical elements to strengthen the patent’s validity in Japan?
Demonstrating novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability are vital. Clearly differentiating the invention from prior art, providing detailed technical data, and including comprehensive claims help strengthen validity.

3. Can existing patents limit the scope of JP2023073349?
Yes. Overlapping patents can present freedom-to-operate challenges. Adequate patent landscape analysis and strategic claim drafting mitigate potential infringement issues.

4. What potential challenges could JP2023073349 face during patent examination?
Challenges may include prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure. Patent examiners may scrutinize the structural novelty and therapeutic utility of the invention.

5. How does Japanese patent law impact the protection offered by JP2023073349?
Japanese patent law, similar to other jurisdictions, provides a 20-year monopoly from the filing date. However, patentability requirements demand rigorous demonstration of novelty and inventive step, influencing patent strength.


Sources:
[1] Japan Patent Office Official Gazette, JP2023073349 publication details.
[2] Japan Patent Law, Articles concerning patentability and scope.
[3] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent trends in Japan (2022-2023).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.