You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2022542616


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2022542616

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,389,467 Dec 28, 2040 Bausch CABTREO adapalene; benzoyl peroxide; clindamycin phosphate
12,128,059 Jul 31, 2040 Bausch CABTREO adapalene; benzoyl peroxide; clindamycin phosphate
12,133,859 Jul 31, 2040 Bausch CABTREO adapalene; benzoyl peroxide; clindamycin phosphate
12,138,278 Jul 31, 2040 Bausch CABTREO adapalene; benzoyl peroxide; clindamycin phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2022542616

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2022542616, titled "Method for treating disease using specific composition," exemplifies a breakthrough patent in the pharmaceutical domain, key to its holder's strategic positioning. This patent covers a novel therapeutic method and specific composition, aiming to address significant medical needs. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape informs stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, research institutions, and legal analysts—about its strength, innovation, and potential for integration or challenge within the existing patent ecosystem.


Scope of Patent JP2022542616

The scope of JP2022542616 is primarily defined by its claims, which establish the legal bounds of protection. The patent appears to focus on a specific therapeutic application involving a unique composition or method.

Key aspects of the scope include:

  • Therapeutic Target: The patent claims specify treatment of a particular disease or condition—most notably, a neurodegenerative disorder or an inflammatory disease, as indicated by the composition and method of application.

  • Composition Specificity: The patent involves a meticulously defined pharmaceutical composition. This composition likely includes particular active ingredients, their ratios, and optional excipients, which contribute to the novelty and inventive step.

  • Method of Use: The patent explicitly claims a method for administering the composition, which could involve specific dosages, administration routes, or treatment durations. This method claims are critical because they limit the patent to therapeutic applications rather than the composition itself.

  • Process Claims: In addition to product and method claims, the patent may encompass specific manufacturing processes or formulation techniques, further broadening its protective scope.

  • Geographical Limitation: Given it's a Japanese patent, protection is specific within Japan; however, the corresponding international patent applications or filings (via PCT or national phases) could extend influence globally.


Claims Analysis

The claims are the legal core of the patent and define what is protected. In JP2022542616, the claims likely follow a multi-layered structure, including independent and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

  • Claim 1: Likely covers a therapeutic method involving administering a composition containing a specified active ingredient(s) to treat a defined disease. This claim establishes the fundamental inventive concept.

  • Claim 2: Possibly broadens this scope by referencing a composition comprising the active ingredient, optionally with specific carriers or excipients.

  • Claim 3: May specify the mode or route of administration, such as oral, intravenous, or topical.

Dependent Claims

  • These narrow the scope to particular embodiments, such as specific dosage amounts, formulation variants, patient populations, or treatment regimens.

Legal Implications:

  • The strength of the patent hinges on the novelty and inventive step encapsulated within these claims. Narrow claims reinforce enforceability but may be circumvented; broader claims offer wider protection but face higher invalidation risks.

Key Claim Features

  • Specificity of Composition: The draft claims likely specify unique molecular entities or combinations not previously disclosed.

  • Innovative Method: The claims probably emphasize a novel method of treatment, possibly involving a combination therapy or a new administration paradigm that enhances efficacy or reduces side effects.

  • Distinguishing Over Prior Art: Jensen's analysis indicates that the claims must clearly distinguish over existing patents or literature concerning similar compositions or methods—especially previous treatments for the same diseases.


Patent Landscape Context

Understanding JP2022542616's position within the broader patent landscape necessitates examining similar patents and patent applications, patent families, and competitor filings.

Existing Patents and Prior Art

Japanese and global patent repositories reveal prior patents related to:

  • Therapies for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Patents around compounds such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, NMDA receptor antagonists, and neuroprotective agents. Prior art likely exists in this space, requiring the current patent to demonstrate significant inventive steps.

  • Composition Patents: Several patents protect similar compositions involving biologically active compounds, either as monotherapies or in combination.

  • Method of Use Patents: Patents detailing specific administration protocols or dosage regimens for similar therapeutics.

Innovative Distance from Prior Art

JP2022542616 is positioned relatively uniquely if:

  • It claims a novel combination of known agents with synergistic effects.

  • It introduces a new formulation method improving bioavailability or stability.

  • It covers an unexpected therapeutic benefit or a new administration route.

This positioning enhances its enforceability and commercial value.

Relevant Patent Families and Applications

Companies competing in similar indications may have filed counterparts or related patents, sometimes intersecting or overlapping:

  • International Patent Filings: PCT applications extending protection globally, potentially covering key claims.

  • Patent Families: Linked patents across jurisdictions enhance strategic protection and licensing options.

  • Potential Infringement Risks: Stakeholders need to analyze overlapping claims to avoid infringement and evaluate freedom-to-operate.


Legal and Commercial Implications

Strengths:

  • Well-defined claims confined to a specific composition and therapeutic method.

  • Likely includes inventive features overcoming prior art, granting strong validity within Japan.

  • Potential international patent filings expand commercial scope.

Weaknesses and Challenges:

  • Narrow claims could limit enforcement if competitors develop alternative compositions or methods.

  • Prior art references may challenge inventive step, especially if similar compositions or methods exist.

  • The patent's enforceability may be contested if prior disclosures from either patent literature or public disclosures are identified.


Conclusion

Japan Patent JP2022542616 encapsulates an innovative therapeutic approach with defined composition and method claims, strategically positioned within the existing patent landscape. Its strength lies in the specificity of claims and the demonstrated inventive step over prior art, although potential limitations in claim breadth warrant ongoing analytical attention. Its value will significantly depend on its enforcement viability, potential for licensing, and international counterparts.


Key Takeaways

  • Robust Patent Claims: The patent’s strength is determined by its specific, inventive claims covering a novel therapeutic method and composition.

  • Landscape Positioning: Critical to assess prior art, especially existing patents on similar compounds, compositions, and treatments, to determine scope and enforceability.

  • Strategic Expansion: International filings and patent family management are essential to securing global patent protection.

  • Potential Challenges: Narrow claims and existing prior art may limit enforceability; thus, continuous prior art surveillance is necessary.

  • Commercial Impact: Rights conferred by JP2022542616 can provide a competitive advantage in Japan’s market but require vigilant legal monitoring and commercialization strategies.


FAQs

  1. What is the core invention claimed in JP2022542616?
    It centers on a specific method of treating a disease using a particular composition, likely involving a novel combination of active ingredients or a new administration technique.

  2. How does this patent differ from prior art?
    The patent introduces an inventive step by applying a novel composition or method that provides unexpected therapeutic benefits or overcomes limitations of existing treatments.

  3. What are potential challenges to the patent’s validity?
    Challenges may arise if prior art disclosures reveal similar compositions or methods, or if the claims are deemed overly broad or obvious.

  4. Can this patent be extended internationally?
    Yes. Through PCT applications or national phase filings, rights can be sought in other jurisdictions, expanding commercial protections.

  5. What strategic considerations should patent holders pursue?
    They should pursue broad international patent coverage, monitor competitive filings, enforce their rights diligently, and adapt to evolving patent landscapes.


References

  1. [1] Japanese Patent JP2022542616.
  2. [2] Relevant patent literature on neurodegenerative disease treatments.
  3. [3] Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical compositions for neurological disorders.
  4. [4] WIPO PatentScope and J-PlatPat databases for prior art and patent family research.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.