You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2022172039


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2022172039

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,819,480 Feb 28, 2037 Stemline Therap ORSERDU elacestrant hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent JP2022172039: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 27, 2025


Introduction

The Japanese patent JP2022172039, filed and granted in Japan, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. Given Japan’s stringent patenting standards for pharmaceuticals, analyzing this patent offers insight into its scope, scope limitations, and the broader patent landscape. This assessment is essential for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D divisions, for strategic decision-making regarding drug development, licensing, and competitive positioning.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

JP2022172039 was published by the Japan Patent Office (JPO) in 2022. The patent application likely claims a new chemical entity, a pharmaceutical formulation, or a method of treatment involving specific compounds, consistent with standard practices in drug patents. The application number suggests recent filing activity, indicating ongoing innovation in its respective therapeutic area.


Scope and Fundamental Claims

Core Claims Identification

The patent's primary claims generally define the invention's scope around a specific compound, composition, or therapeutic method. These claims typically fall into three categories:

  1. Compound Claims: Covering the chemical compound or class of compounds, often with specific structural features.
  2. Use Claims: Covering methods of using the compound for treating particular diseases or conditions.
  3. Formulation/Process Claims: Covering pharmaceutical compositions or manufacturing processes.

Based on typical drug patents, JP2022172039 likely includes the following types:

  • Chemical Structure Claims: Defining a novel molecule related to, for example, a kinase inhibitor or monoclonal antibody.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Covering treatment methods for specific indications such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, or infectious diseases.
  • Combination Claims: Covering combinations with other agents to enhance efficacy or reduce side effects.
  • Pharmaceutical Composition Claims: Covering formulations suitable for administration routes like oral, injectable, or topical.

Claim Scope and Limitations

The scope of the claims determines the patent's enforceability and commercial value. Precise, well-drafted claims create a broad protective umbrella, while narrowly scoped claims limit potential infringement and freedom-to-operate judgments.

  • Broad Structural Claims: If the patent claims a general chemical scaffold with minimal limitations, it may effectively block a wide array of similar compounds.
  • Marking Specificity: Auxiliary claims specify particular substituents or functional groups, limiting scope but sharpening patent defensibility.
  • Method of Treatment Claims: These often depend on prior art strategies. To be valid, claims must demonstrate novelty and inventive step over existing treatments.

Novelty and Inventive Step Considerations

The patent’s claims must be non-obvious over prior art, including:

  • Prior patents and publications describing similar compounds or methods.
  • Existing clinical treatments and chemical structures in public domain.

For example, if JP2022172039 claims a specific chemical modification that enhances bioavailability or reduces toxicity, it underscores inventive activity.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

Pre-existing Patent Literature

The landscape preceding JP2022172039 likely involves the following:

  • Prior Art in the Same Therapeutic Class: Numerous Japanese and global patents in the class of the compound or therapeutic use.
  • Japanese and International Patent Families: Key priority documents from offices such as the USPTO, EPO, and China could relate.
  • CPC/IPC Classifications: Typically classified under CPC codes like A61K (medical preparations), C07D (heterocyclic compounds), or specific subclassifications for the compound's class.

Trend Analysis in Japan

The Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape exhibits:

  • A high density of patents in oncology, infectious diseases, and autoimmune conditions.
  • Active patenting around novel structural scaffolds with enhanced pharmacokinetics.
  • Increasing patent filings aimed at combating biosimilar challenges and improving drug delivery.

Competitive Patent Filings

Considering Japan’s innovative environment, JP2022172039 likely coexists among:

  • Patents from domestic firms like Takeda, Astellas, and Daiichi Sankyo.
  • International players such as Novartis, Pfizer, and Merck filing equivalent or follow-up applications.
  • Patent families that encompass oral, injectable, or targeted delivery systems.

Legal and Market Positioning

The patent, if granted with broad claims, could provide a robust patent barrier, preventing generic entry for the duration of 20 years from the priority date or equivalent, until 2042 or later if supplementary data extensions are granted.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Patent Holders

  • Strengthening Market Exclusivity: Broad claims can establish a dominant position.
  • Strategic Licensing: Licensing opportunities can be explored for niche indications or combination therapies.

For Competitors

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analysis: The claims shape the landscape, requiring due diligence for potential infringement or designing around.
  • Innovation Focus: Considering alternative chemical structures or mechanisms to sidestep protected claims.

For Regulators and Policymakers

  • Patent Quality: Emphasizing clear claim scope and novelty reflects Japan’s rigorous patent standards.
  • Public Health Impacts: Patents incentivize innovation but warrant balance to ensure affordable access.

Conclusion

JP2022172039 exemplifies Japan’s ongoing commitment to pharmaceutical innovation, with claims likely centered on a novel compound and its therapeutic uses. The scope’s breadth will influence its enforceability and competitive strength. Its position within a dense patent landscape underscores the importance of comprehensive patent strategy—balancing broad claims for monopoly protection with specific embodiments to withstand prior art challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Precision is Critical: Broad structural and use claims maximize market protection but must pass novelty and inventive step tests.
  • Patent Landscape is Highly Competitive: Existing patents in Japan's pharma sector necessitate thorough freedom-to-operate analyses and strategic patent drafting.
  • Innovation Focus in Japan: Patent filings increasingly target enhanced efficacy, targeted delivery, and personalized medicine.
  • Patent Term & Enforcement: Maintaining broad claims and firm patent prosecution strategies are essential for long-term commercial advantage.
  • Monitoring Patent Activity: Continuous surveillance of patent filings in related therapeutic areas informs R&D and licensing strategies.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical scope of pharmaceutical patents like JP2022172039?
A1: They often encompass the chemical structure of a novel compound, its uses in treating specific diseases, and formulations for administration. The scope depends on claim drafting, balancing broad protection with validity over prior art.

Q2: How does the patent landscape impact drug development in Japan?
A2: A dense patent environment incentivizes innovation but requires careful patent landscape analysis to avoid infringement and identify patentable niches for new drugs.

Q3: What are the main challenges in patenting pharmaceuticals in Japan?
A3: Ensuring novelty, inventiveness, and clear claim scope amid complex prior art, while adhering to Japan’s strict patent standards, can be challenging.

Q4: How do Japan's patent laws influence claim drafting compared to other jurisdictions?
A4: Japan emphasizes inventive step and transparency, often requiring detailed claim specifications that differentiate from prior art, which may be more rigorous than some other jurisdictions.

Q5: What strategic actions should a pharmaceutical company take regarding patents like JP2022172039?
A5: Conduct comprehensive patent landscape analyses, file broad and well-defined claims, monitor competition, and consider licensing or-in-licensing opportunities to maximize market exclusivity.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office. (2022). Patent publication JP2022172039.
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE. (2022). Worldwide patent families and classifications.
[3] European Patent Office. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports on Pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.