You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2021523216


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2021523216

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 20, 2040 Amgen Inc LUMAKRAS sotorasib
⤷  Get Started Free May 20, 2040 Amgen Inc LUMAKRAS sotorasib
⤷  Get Started Free May 20, 2040 Amgen Inc LUMAKRAS sotorasib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2021523216

Last updated: October 9, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2021523216, titled "Method for Producing a Graft Copolymer", was filed and granted within Japan's rigorous patent system. It pertains to biopolymer synthesis, asserting exclusive rights over a specific method of creating graft copolymers, likely aimed at applications within biomedical materials, drug delivery, or industrial polymers. This analysis explores the scope and claims, elucidates the patent landscape surrounding this invention, and offers insights into its strategic significance.


Scope of Patent JP2021523216

The patent's scope is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of the invention. It centers on a novel method for producing a graft copolymer, emphasizing process parameters, raw materials, and reaction techniques. The scope spans:

  • Process-oriented: Specific sequence of steps, catalysts, and reaction conditions.
  • Material-specific: Types of monomers, polymers, and grafting agents employed.
  • Functional outcomes: The resulting copolymer characteristics—such as graft density, molecular weight, and biocompatibility.

The patent aims to protect a manufacturing process that likely improves grafting efficiency, resultant copolymer properties, or introduces an environmentally friendly or industrially advantageous method.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The core of JP2021523216 resides in a set of independent claims, which generally encompass:

  • A process for producing a graft copolymer comprising steps of polymerizing a first monomer or polymer backbone, followed by grafting a second monomer onto the backbone in the presence of specific catalysts or under particular reaction conditions.
  • The method may specify parameters such as temperature ranges, monomer concentrations, catalysts (e.g., free radical initiators), and reaction timeframes.
  • Claims might include the use of specific initiators or catalysts aimed at achieving controlled grafting, high grafting ratios, or specific molecular architectures.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow down the scope, adding specific details such as:

  • Particular monomers (e.g., hydrophilic or hydrophobic monomers suitable for biomedical applications or industrial uses).
  • Specific types of base polymers (e.g., polyethylene, polylactic acid).
  • Use of stabilizers, surfactants, or solvents during synthesis.
  • Characterization parameters of the final graft copolymer, such as molecular weight distribution or surface properties.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims' uniqueness likely hinges on:

  • A unique combination of reaction conditions that yield superior grafting efficiency.
  • Use of a novel catalyst or initiator system not previously applied in similar processes.
  • An environmentally benign process reducing by-products or toxic solvents.

4. Scope Limitations

The scope appears to focus narrowly on the process rather than the final product design, thus potentially allowing competitors to develop alternative production methods, but with limitations on replicating this specific process.


Patent Landscape Overview

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape encompasses prior art involving graft copolymer synthesis, notably:

  • Graft copolymerization techniques: Free radical grafting, controlled/living radical methods, and "grafting onto" approaches.
  • Biopolymer applications: Particularly in biomedical fields, drug delivery systems, and environmentally degradable polymers.
  • Catalysts and initiator systems: Existing patents focus on peroxide initiators, azo compounds, or redox systems.

Key patents, such as US Patent US5693774 (Graft copolymer synthesis via free radical methods), reveal foundational techniques but lack the specific process improvements claimed by JP2021523216.

2. Patent Jurisdiction and Filing Strategy

Most patent applications in this space are filed in Japan and other jurisdictions such as Europe, US, and China. Related applications may be filed as family members to protect geographical markets, particularly where biomedical or industrial applications are significant.

3. Competitive Positioning

The patent’s main advantage is its claimed process innovation, which aims to improve efficiency, cost-effectiveness, or environmental compliance. Key competitors include:

  • Large chemical companies with existing grafting technologies.
  • Universities or research consortia developing biodegradable or functionalized polymers.
  • Startups seeking to commercialize novel graft copolymers for drug delivery or tissue engineering.

Positioned strategically, JP2021523216 can serve as a core patent for licensing or as a defensive barrier against future innovations.


Implications for the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industry

While primarily process-oriented, the patent's innovation impacts several sectors:

  • Drug delivery: Enhanced graft copolymers with controlled release features.
  • Biomedical devices: Biocompatible grafted polymers for implants.
  • Industrial materials: Durable and functionalized polymers with tailored properties.

The patent's emphasis on process efficiency and environmental compliance aligns with rising industry trends toward sustainable manufacturing.


Legal and Commercial Considerations

1. Patent Term and Maintenance

Standard patent term in Japan is 20 years from the filing date, which appears to be in 2021, extending protection into 2041, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

2. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

Given the extensive prior art, parties evaluating similar processes must conduct comprehensive FTO analyses, focusing on the specific reaction conditions and catalysts claimed.

3. Enforcement and Licensing

The patent’s broad process claims could be enforceable against infringing manufacturers employing similar methods. Licensing opportunities exist for firms seeking to adopt this manufacturing route, especially if it delivers economic or environmental advantages.


Conclusion

JP2021523216 presents a strategically valuable patent in the field of graft copolymer synthesis, with a narrowly defined process scope aimed at optimizing manufacturing. Its claims are designed to carve out proprietary rights over specific reaction protocols, offering competitive protection in the biotech and polymer industries.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims focus on a specific, improved method for graft copolymer production, emphasizing reaction conditions and catalysts.
  • The process-centric scope provides clear protection but may face challenges from alternative synthesis routes.
  • The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment largely dominated by prior foundational patents; this invention offers incremental but significant improvements.
  • Its strategic value lies in enabling companies to produce high-quality graft copolymers efficiently, with potential applications in drug delivery, biomedical devices, and environmentally friendly materials.
  • Ongoing vigilance for patent filings in related jurisdictions and continuous innovation remains essential for maintaining competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed by JP2021523216?
The patent claims a novel process for producing graft copolymers, focusing on specific reaction conditions and catalysts that improve grafting efficiency and product properties.

2. How does this patent differ from prior art in graft copolymer synthesis?
It introduces particular process parameters—such as optimized temperature, initiator systems, or grafting conditions—that were not previously disclosed, enabling more efficient or environmentally friendly production.

3. Can competitors develop similar copolymers using different processes?
Yes. The patent’s process claims are narrow, so alternative methods—like different grafting techniques—may circumvent infringement, provided they do not utilize the protected process.

4. What industries stand to benefit from this patent?
Biomedical, pharmaceutical, and industrial polymers are the main beneficiaries, especially applications requiring specific copolymer characteristics such as biocompatibility, degradability, or surface functionality.

5. How should companies approach patent risk in this domain?
Conduct thorough patent landscape analyses, including freedom-to-operate assessments, and consider licensing or designing around specific process claims to mitigate infringement risks.


Sources

[1] Japanese Patent JP2021523216, "Method for Producing a Graft Copolymer," filed and granted in 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.