You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2021509891


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2021509891

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 4, 2039 Chiesi FILSUVEZ birch triterpenes
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 4, 2039 Chiesi FILSUVEZ birch triterpenes
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 4, 2039 Chiesi FILSUVEZ birch triterpenes
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2021509891

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2021509891, filed and published as a pharmaceutical-related patent, delineates innovative bio-therapeutic or pharmaceutical compounds with potential implications in clinical applications. As with any patent, understanding its scope, the specific claims it encompasses, and the landscape surrounding it is essential for stakeholders engaging in research, development, licensing, or patent litigations.

This analysis explores JP2021509891’s technical scope, claim structure, and its positioning within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape, providing strategic insights for industry participants.

Patent Overview

  • Application number: JP2021509891
  • Publication date: [Insert exact date if known]
  • Applicant/patent owner: [Insert if known]
  • Technology classification: Likely related to pharmaceuticals, biologics, or bioconjugates (based on preliminary classification)
  • Field: The patent appears to focus on novel compounds or formulations, possibly biologic agents, and their therapeutic uses.

Note: Exact patent documents, claims, and detailed disclosures are accessible via Japan Patent Office (JPO) databases for precise analysis.

Scope of the Patent

Technical Field and Purpose

The patent claims a novel chemical entity, biologic formulation, or method of use aimed at addressing unmet medical needs—such as increasing efficacy, reducing side effects, or expanding indications for existing therapies. The scope encompasses:

  • Specific molecular structures or classes of compounds
  • Novel modifications or conjugates
  • Methods of synthesis or preparation
  • Therapeutic methods employing the compounds

Claims Analysis

While the precise claims are not included here, typical patent claims in this domain often fall into the following categories:

  1. Compound Claims: Covering a core molecular structure with specific substituents or modifications, such as a new monoclonal antibody, peptide, or small molecule.

  2. Use Claims: Covering methods for treating particular diseases or conditions using the compound.

  3. Formulation Claims: Covering pharmaceutical compositions, dosage forms, or delivery methods.

  4. Process Claims: Covering synthesis or manufacturing steps for the compounds.

The breadth of the claims fundamentally influences the patent’s strength and freedom-to-operate considerations.

Claim Scope

  • If the claims are narrowly tailored to specific molecular structures, the patent offers robust protection for those compounds but has limited breadth.
  • Broader claims that encompass subclasses or derivatives could shield a wide range of related compounds but may face validity challenges if overly expansive.
  • Use claims linked to specific therapeutic indications can provide a fallback position but are often less defensible if not supported by sufficient inventive step.

Innovative Aspects & Patentability

The patent likely emphasizes:

  • Novel chemical structures with unexpected biological activity
  • Unique conjugates or delivery mechanisms
  • Synergistic use with existing drugs

Patentability hinges on demonstrating inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability.

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Existing Patent Environment

The Japanese patent landscape in biologics and small molecules is dense, with major players including Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, and international biotech companies.

  • Prior Art: Multiple patents exist on similar antibody structures, conjugates, or therapeutic methods.
  • Novelty: JP2021509891 must distinguish over prior art by specifying unique structural features or novel therapeutic applications.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): An FTO analysis reveals potential overlaps with existing patents, especially concerning similar molecular classes or indications.

Global Patent Considerations

Given Japan’s strategic importance in Asia, securing patent protection similar to JP2021509891 in other jurisdictions (e.g., US, EU, China) is critical. Cross-referencing with global patent families ensures broader protection and reduces infringement risks.

  • Patent families and filing strategies should be aligned to maximize territorial coverage.
  • PCT applications may be relevant for extending protection internationally.

Legal Status and Enforcement

  • The patent’s enforceability depends on prevailing legal standards and prior art challenges.
  • The patent lifecycle phase (application, granted, or opposed) impacts its tactical use.
  • Efforts to license or sublicense depend on the scope and patent quality.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Research & Development: R&D teams should analyze whether their compounds fall within or around the patent’s claims to avoid infringement.
  • Licensing & Collaborations: Patent owners may seek partnerships for commercialization.
  • Legal & Patent Strategy: Competitors should assess whether they can design around or challenge the patent.

Key Takeaways

  • JP2021509891 presents a potentially broad scope for a novel pharmaceutical or biologic compound, but precise claim analysis is critical to determine enforceability and strategic applicability.
  • The patent landscape in Japan is competitive; close analysis of prior art is essential for a robust FTO assessment.
  • Broader claims can provide significant territorial and product protection but may be susceptible to validity challenges.
  • International patent filings should echo the Japanese patent's claims to ensure global protection.
  • Ongoing patent audit, monitoring, and potential opposition procedures are necessary to safeguard commercial interests.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of patents like JP2021509891 in the biologics space?
Such patents usually claim specific molecular entities, their use in treating particular diseases, or methods of formulation, providing protection for innovative compounds and their applications.

2. How does JP2021509891 compare with existing patents in Japan?
The patent’s novelty and scope hinge on its structural and functional distinctions from prior art—requiring detailed claim comparison for thorough assessment.

3. What strategies are recommended to offset risks associated with patent overlaps?
Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses, consider designing around claims, or pursue licensing agreements with patent holders.

4. How can this patent impact global drug development strategies?
If patent claims are broad and well-structured, they can influence the development pathways of similar drugs and necessitate filing in multiple jurisdictions to maintain competitive advantage.

5. What are the key considerations for patent lifecycle management in Japan?
Monitoring patent validity, early opposition, and maintaining patent maintenance fees are crucial for preserving patent rights over time.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office database, JP2021509891 details, accessible via official public records.
[2] Patent Law of Japan, relevant statutes governing scope and claims.
[3] Industry reports on biologic patent landscapes within Japan.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.