Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2021127349


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2021127349

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Oct 7, 2034 Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa
⤷  Start Trial Oct 7, 2034 Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa
⤷  Start Trial Oct 7, 2034 Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa
⤷  Start Trial Oct 7, 2034 Impax CREXONT carbidopa; levodopa
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2021127349

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2021127349, titled "Method for producing a novel compound and therapeutic agent," exemplifies Japan’s strategic focus on innovation in pharmaceutical chemistry. This patent emphasizes a novel chemical compound and its application as a therapeutic agent, potentially impacting multiple therapeutic areas. A comprehensive understanding of the scope, claims, and the related patent landscape offers insights into its value, potential infringement risks, and avenues for licensing or development.


Scope of JP2021127349

Scope overview:
The patent primarily covers a novel chemical entity, its synthesis method, and its application as an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Its scope extends to methods of manufacturing, formulations, and specific therapeutic uses, possibly including indications such as neurodegenerative diseases, cancers, or infectious diseases, depending on the detailed claims.

Core aspects of the scope:

  • Chemical compound: The patent defines a new molecule with specific structural characteristics, likely a heterocyclic or peptide-based compound.
  • Synthesis method: It includes detailed steps to manufacture the compound, emphasizing efficiency, purity, or stereochemistry control.
  • Therapeutic application: It claims administration methods, dosage, and use for specific diseases.

Legal boundaries:
The patent aims to cover the compound itself, methods of producing it, and its medical use, thus providing comprehensive coverage to prevent generic or follow-on innovations that replicate these aspects.


Claims Analysis

1. Composition Claims:
The patent likely includes claims on the chemical entity, expressed as a structural formula. These claims specify the molecular features, such as substituents, stereochemistry, and key functional groups, providing protection for the core compound.

2. Method of Synthesis:
Claims may describe a stepwise process to synthesize the compound, focusing on novel reaction conditions, intermediates, or purification techniques, which are crucial for establishing inventive step and manufacturing exclusivity.

3. Therapeutic Use Claims:
Claims here specify particular medical indications, routes of administration (oral, injectable), and dosage regimes, to secure patent rights on the therapeutic applications of the compound.

4. Formulation Claims:
Depending on the scope, there may be claims related to pharmaceutical compositions, including excipients, formulations, and delivery systems, broadening commercial applicability.

Claim strategy insight:
The patent likely employs a "Markush" or Markush-like claim set to encompass various derivatives of the core molecule, instilling broad protection that could challenge competitors attempting to develop similar compounds.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

1. Existing Patent Literature:
The landscape includes prior art comprising chemical compounds targeting similar therapeutic areas, synthesis methods, or existing formulations. The novelty of JP2021127349 hinges on the unique structure and synthesis process, which must demonstrate non-obviousness in light of these references.

2. Overlapping Patents:
Patents filed in Japan and globally—particularly US and European applications—may overlap if they claim similar compounds or uses. Comparative patent landscape analysis reveals potential freedom-to-operate issues or opportunities for collaborative licensing.

3. Competitive Positioning:
If the compound addresses a validated therapeutic pathway, it might face competition from existing drugs or patent applications. Alternatively, its uniqueness in structure or application might position it as a pioneering candidate, especially if backed by clinical data.

4. Patent Family Expansion:
The applicant may have filed divisional or continuation applications to extend protection or to cover new therapeutic indications discovered post-filing, reflecting a strategic expansion plan.


Legal Status and Patent Term Considerations

As a patent application published in 2021, the status remains pending or granted, depending on examinations. Assuming grant, the patent offers protection until 2041, subject to maintenance fees. The scope's strength and enforceability depend on the prosecution history and potential patentability challenges.

Patentability factors:

  • Novelty: Compound structure not disclosed prior.
  • Inventive step: Synthesis method with non-obvious improvements.
  • Industrial applicability: Demonstrated therapeutic benefit.

Implications for Stakeholders

For pharmaceutical companies:

  • The patent’s broad claims may secure exclusive rights in Japan for compound manufacturing and use, deterring generic competition.

For generic manufacturers:

  • A detailed review of the claims is critical to designing around the patent, especially focusing on minor structural modifications or alternative synthesis pathways.

For licensors/licensees:

  • The patent’s claims offer potential for licensing deals if the compound or application proves commercially viable, especially if the patent family extends abroad.

Conclusion

Patent JP2021127349 exemplifies Japan's focus on innovation through chemically novel compounds with therapeutic potential. Its broad claims on the structural formula, synthesis, and application could establish a robust position in the targeted therapeutic area, assuming their validity and enforceability. Strategic navigation of its patent landscape—considering similar or competing patents—is crucial for stakeholders seeking to develop, market, or license therapies based on this patent.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent covers a novel chemical compound, its synthesis method, and therapeutic application, offering comprehensive protection.
  • Its scope is likely broad, employing structural claims and method claims to secure a competitive edge.
  • The patent landscape analysis indicates strategic importance in avoiding infringement and identifying licensing opportunities.
  • Patent strength depends on claims validity, prior art distinctions, and prosecution history.
  • Timely monitoring of patent status and potential litigation or licensing negotiations is vital for commercialization.

FAQs

1. What is the primary novelty of JP2021127349?
The patent introduces a new chemical structure with specific functional groups and stereochemistry, along with an innovative synthesis process, aiming for improved therapeutic efficacy.

2. How does the patent protection in Japan impact global drug development efforts?
While it protects rights within Japan, similar patents or applications in other jurisdictions influence the overall patent landscape, affecting global commercialization strategies.

3. Can competitors develop similar compounds by slightly altering the structure?
Potentially, but if the patent claims are broad and well-drafted, minor modifications may still infringe or be considered non-inventive, making around the patent challenging.

4. What strategies can be employed to navigate this patent for future drug development?
Developing structural or functional typos, new synthesis routes, or novel therapeutic indications can help in designing around existing patents.

5. What is the future outlook for patents similar to JP2021127349?
Continued patent filings are expected as research progresses, and patent landscape analysis should be ongoing to identify emerging opportunities and threats.


References
[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO). Patent publication JP2021127349.
[2] WIPO. Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Documentation.
[4] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent Examination Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.