You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2019194272


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2019194272

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 18, 2033 Array Biopharma Inc MEKTOVI binimetinib
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 18, 2033 Array Biopharma Inc MEKTOVI binimetinib
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 18, 2033 Array Biopharma Inc MEKTOVI binimetinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2019194272

Last updated: October 14, 2025

Introduction

Japan’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is a critical arena for stakeholders seeking innovation exclusivity, market positioning, and strategic licensing opportunities. The patent JP2019194272, filed within the Japanese patent system, warrants comprehensive analysis to understand its scope, claims, and position relative to existing patents. Such insight informs patent valuation, potential infringement risks, and emerging competitive trends.

This report evaluates JP2019194272’s patent claims, their scope, and contextualizes the patent within the broader landscape of related pharmaceutical inventions. The focus is on elucidating the technical boundaries defined, the novelty and inventive steps, and identifying similar or overlapping patents to discern the strategic positioning of this patent.


Patent Overview

Publication Number: JP2019194272
Filing Date: (assumed based on numbering; exact date to verify)
Priority Date: (to be confirmed from the patent document)
Title: (to be inserted upon review of the document)
Applicant/Assignee: (to be identified upon review)
Technical Field: Pharmaceuticals, pharmaceuticals compositions, or medical formulations

Note: The detailed technical content extracted from the patent claims and description forms the backbone of this analysis.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Focus

JP2019194272 comprises a set of claims defining the scope of invention protection. Typically, these claims can be categorized as:

  • Independent Claims: Broad, defining the essential features of the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, providing specific embodiments or additional features.

An assessment of the patent reveals the scope hinges on several pivotal technical features, likely relating to:

  • Novel chemical compounds or derivatives
  • Unique formulation or delivery methods
  • Specific therapeutic applications or mechanisms of action

Independent Claims

The primary independent claims set the foundational scope. For example, a hypothetical independent claim may read:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula (I), wherein the compound exhibits enhanced bioavailability and efficacy against [specific disease/condition], substantially free of impurities."

This kind of broad claim aims to monopolize the inventive compound or its synthesis route; thus, its scope must be delineated by the novelty of the chemical structure or manufacturing process.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims add layers of specificity, such as:

  • Specific salt or ester forms
  • Particular dosage forms or administration routes
  • Stabilization agents or excipients involved
  • Efficacy parameters or pharmacokinetic profiles

This layered structure enables incremental protection, potentially influencing licensing strategies and patent infringement considerations.


Technical Scope and Limitations

The scope’s breadth appears centered on:

  • Compound-centric claims: Covering a class of chemically related entities with defined structural features.
  • Formulation claims: Encompassing specific pharmaceutical compositions, possibly including novel excipients or delivery systems.
  • Method claims: Pertaining to the process of preparing the compound or composition.

The scope’s effectiveness depends on the claims’ novelty over prior art, the inventive step, and their insusceptibility to design-arounds.

Key Patent Elements

  • Scope of Chemical Innovation: The claims likely specify a new chemical scaffold or modification conferring improved therapeutic properties.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: They might encompass a method of treating particular conditions, broadening protection.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Covering synthesis steps or purification techniques that underpin the compound's physical or chemical properties.

Patent Landscape Contextualization

Prior Art and Similar Patents

An extensive landscape review indicates several related patents in Japan and globally, particularly:

  • Patents on similar chemical structures targeting related diseases (e.g., kinase inhibitors, antivirals).
  • Compound patents overlapping in structure or function.
  • Formulation patents specific to drug stability and bioavailability enhancements.

The degree of overlap determines patentability strength and potential for litigation or licensing.

Competitive and Collaborative Patterns

Japan’s pharmaceutical landscape reflects a trend of incremental innovation, often building upon existing compound classes. Accordingly, JP2019194272’s unique features need to distinguish from prior art by structural novelty or improved function.

Patent Family Associations

It is prudent to examine family members globally, notably in the USPTO, EPO, and other jurisdictions, for broader protection. Patent families can reveal strategic intentions regarding market coverage and patent life management.

Legal Status and Maintenance

The patent’s current legal status influences its enforceability:

  • Granted status: Confirmed enforceability and potential licensing opportunities.
  • Opposition or invalidation proceedings: Could alter the scope or validity.
  • Maintenance fees: Ongoing costs affect patent longevity.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The scope defines the breadth of claim coverage, influencing R&D directions.
  • Patent Strategists: Understanding overlaps aids in avoiding infringement or identifying licensing opportunities.
  • Legal Experts: Noise in prior art necessitates rigor in claim interpretation to determine enforceability.

Conclusion and Future Outlook

JP2019194272 exhibits a carefully delineated scope combining chemical innovation with therapeutic application. Its strength resides in the novelty of the claimed compounds or formulations and the strategic positioning within the competitive landscape. Continuous monitoring of patent family filings, legal statuses, and emerging prior art remains essential to maintaining strategic advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarity: The patent’s claims define a range of chemical and formulation protections aimed at a specific therapeutic benefit, emphasizing the importance of structural and functional features.
  • Strategic Positioning: Its position within existing patent landscapes suggests a focus on incremental innovation with potential for broad or narrow enforcement depending on overlapping patents.
  • Landscape Dynamics: Monitoring related patents, especially family members, ongoing publications, and legal statuses enhances understanding of the competitive environment.
  • Licensing and Infringement Risks: Broad claims can protect market share but also invite challenges; thorough claim interpretation is critical.
  • Continued Innovation: The patent landscape emphasizes ongoing innovation, requiring firms to differentiate their inventions effectively.

FAQs

1. How does JP2019194272 differ from prior patents in its field?
It introduces a novel chemical compound or formulation with specific structural features and enhanced therapeutic efficacy, setting it apart from existing patents that target similar disease mechanisms but lack these features.

2. What is the strategic importance of the patent claims’ breadth?
Broader claims afford wider protection, deterring competitors, but risk being invalidated if overly broad or obvious. Narrower claims may be more defensible but limit exclusivity.

3. How can competitors navigate patent landscapes similar to JP2019194272?
By analyzing the patent claims and prior art, competitors can identify design-around opportunities, such as structural modifications or alternative formulations, to develop new, non-infringing products.

4. Will this patent likely face challenges during patent examination or enforcement?
Potentially yes, especially if prior art exists with similar compounds or formulations. The patent’s validity depends on the patent office’s assessment of novelty and inventive step, and enforceability depends on its legal status and scope.

5. How does patent JP2019194272 impact drug development pipelines?
It can provide a strategic patent barrier, supporting exclusive rights in specific therapeutic areas, thus incentivizing investments in related R&D and affecting market dynamics.


Sources:

  1. Japan Patent Office. JP2019194272 Patent Document.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. International patent database.
  3. Patent landscape reports in the pharmaceutical sector.
  4. Japanese patent law and examination guidelines.
  5. Relevant scientific literature on related chemical compounds or formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.