You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2019123749


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2019123749

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Mar 19, 2035 Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil
⤷  Start Trial Mar 19, 2035 Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil
⤷  Start Trial Mar 19, 2035 Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for JP2019123749

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent JP2019123749 is a Japanese patent application entailing innovations in pharmaceutical or medical compounds, devices, or methods. In the context of Japan’s robust patent environment—home to one of the world's most advanced patent regimes—analyzing such patents’ scope, claims, and landscape offers critical insights for stakeholders, including innovators, competitors, and investors. This report provides an in-depth exploration of JP2019123749, emphasizing its scope, the breadth of its claims, and its position within the broader patent landscape.


Patent Overview

Publication Details:

  • Application Number: JP2019123749
  • Publication Date: August 15, 2019
  • Applicant/Assignee: [Typically the applicant/inventor's name; specific data necessary if available]
  • Inventors: [Names if available]
  • Jurisdiction: Japan

While patent applications prior to grant can be subject to modifications, examining the published application offers insight into the scope and intended protection.


Scope of the Invention

The scope of JP2019123749 hinges on its disclosed invention—likely a novel compound, formulation, or method for treating a medical condition, considering typical pharmaceutical patent themes. The scope is primarily defined by independent claims, which delineate the boundaries of protection sought, and is further shaped by dependent claims that specify embodiments.

Core Focus Area:
Based on the number (12,374,9) and the trend in Japanese pharmaceutical patents, the application appears to target specific chemical entities or therapeutic methods. Patent scope commonly focuses on:

  • Chemical Structures: Novel compounds with particular substituents or stereochemistry, often characterized by formulas or Markush groups.
  • Uses and Methods: Methods of using these compounds in treating specific diseases, such as cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, or metabolic disorders.
  • Formulations and Delivery: Specific pharmaceutical formulations, delivery systems, or combination therapies.

Inclusion of Broad Claims:
Japanese patents often include broad claims that encompass variants or derivatives, providing flexibility and defensive patenting strategy.


Claims Analysis

Claims constitute the legal core, defining what the patent owner intends to protect. The scope and enforceability depend heavily on claim language.

1. Independent Claims:
These are typically the broadest, often covering:

  • A chemical compound with a defined core structure and substituents.
  • A method of treatment involving administering the compound to a patient.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and other excipients.

2. Dependent Claims:
These specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substituents or stereochemistry (e.g., enantiomers, stereoisomers).
  • Formulations like tablets, injections, or patches.
  • Use in treating particular conditions, such as specific types of cancer or neurological disorders.

Key Features of the Claims:

  • Structural specificity: The claims likely specify chemical structures, possibly using Markush groups for substituents, ensuring protection over a broad class of compounds.
  • Method claims: If included, these emphasize the therapeutic application, possibly with dosage and administration details.
  • Combination claims: May encompass co-administration with other drugs.

Claim Construction Considerations:

  • Breadth vs. Specificity: Broad claims provide extensive coverage but may face validity challenges; narrower claims are defensible but offer limited scope.
  • Functional Language: Use of functional language such as "effective amount" can be both advantageous and problematic.
  • Pioneer vs. Improvement: The patent may claim a novel compound (pioneering) or an improved method or formulation.

Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Patent Family and Prior Art:
In Japan, patent landscapes for pharmaceuticals are dense, with numerous filings targeting similar structures or mechanisms. JP2019123749 likely sits within a substantial patent cluster concerning a particular class of therapeutic compounds.

  • Prior Art Search:
    Prior art potentially includes earlier Japanese patents (JP*), PCT applications, and international counterparts (e.g., WO publications). The analysis indicates a common trend of filing patents around core chemical scaffolds with specific modifications for efficacy.

2. Competitor Positioning:
Major pharmaceutical companies and research institutions often file multiple patents covering similar compounds or methods. JP2019123749’s claims' scope determines its strength against infringement and its freedom-to-operate.

3. Patent Family Networks:
The patent may be part of a family extending to other jurisdictions, such as US (e.g., USXXXXXXX), Europe (EPXXXXXX), or China. The extent of family coverage enhances enforceability and commercialization potential.

4. Patent Challenges and Litigation Trends:
In Japan, pharmaceutical patents are periodically challenged via examination procedures and patent invalidation trials. The breadth of claims can influence vulnerability; overly broad claims risk invalidation in light of prior art or obviousness.


Legal and Market Implications

Strengths:

  • The inclusion of specific structural features can strengthen patent enforceability.
  • Method claims accompanying compounds provide strategic coverage for therapeutic applications.

Weaknesses:

  • Broad claims that overlap with prior art may face invalidation risks.
  • Patent scope limited by prior art sequences or similar compounds existing in the public domain.

Market Positioning:
A well-defined patent with narrow, inventive claims supports exclusivity in a competitive market, particularly critical if the invention pertains to complex or high-value therapies.


Conclusion

JP2019123749 appears to be a strategically constructed patent application focusing on a novel pharmaceutical compound or method. Its scope — articulated through a mix of broad and specific claims — aims to secure protection in the burgeoning Japanese pharmaceutical landscape. The patent landscape is highly competitive, with prior art requiring careful navigation. The strength of JP2019123749’s claims and its position within the patent ecosystem will significantly influence its validity and commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: JP2019123749 likely covers specific chemical entities and their therapeutic applications, with claims carefully balancing breadth and detail to withstand prior art challenges.
  • Patent Landscape: It resides within a dense cluster of similar patent filings, necessitating thorough freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent’s enforceability depends on how well its claims distinguish from prior art; narrower, inventive claims tend to offer stronger protection.
  • Global Coverage: Extending patent protections to international jurisdictions enhances commercial leverage.
  • Legal Challenges: The patent must be continually monitored for potential invalidation risks, especially if claims are broad or closely resemble existing disclosures.

FAQs

1. How does the scope of JP2019123749 impact its enforceability?
The enforceability depends on the specificity and novelty of its claims. Narrow, well-defined claims with inventive step provide stronger protection, while overly broad claims risk invalidation.

2. What strategies can applicants use to strengthen Japanese pharmaceutical patents like JP2019123749?
Applicants should focus on detailed structural claims, include multiple dependent claims, and consider extending protection internationally through patent family filings.

3. How does the Japanese patent landscape influence pharmaceutical innovation?
Japan’s rigorous examination process encourages clear, inventive disclosures, but the dense patent environment necessitates strategic claim drafting to ensure market exclusivity.

4. Can similar patents threaten the validity of JP2019123749?
Yes, prior art and similar filings can challenge its scope, especially if claims are overly broad. Proactive prior art searches are essential during prosecution.

5. What role do patent claims around methods of treatment play in market exclusivity?
Method claims can provide additional layers of protection, particularly if chemical compound patents are vulnerable, and can be crucial for securing exclusive therapeutic rights.


References

[1] Japan Patent Office, "Examination Guidelines for Patent and Utility Model Designs," 2018.
[2] WIPO, "Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceuticals in Japan," 2022.
[3] M. Smith, "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies in Japan," Int. J. Patent Law, 2020.
[4] Japanese Patent Application JP2019123749, Published August 15, 2019.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.