Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2019065017


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2019065017

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jan 9, 2033 Innocoll Pharms XARACOLL bupivacaine hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Patent JP2019065017: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

Last updated: February 24, 2026

What is the scope of patent JP2019065017?

JP2019065017 is a Japan patent application filed for a pharmaceutical compound or composition. The patent abstract indicates it is related to a novel drug candidate targeting a specific disease, likely involving a new chemical entity or a novel use of an existing compound.

The scope revolves around:

  • A chemical compound with particular structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition containing the compound.
  • Methods for preventing or treating a disease with the compound.
  • Specific formulations and methods of administration.
  • Potential intermediate compounds or derivatives.

The protection extends to the compound itself, its salts, isomers, and derivatives, as well as methods of producing the compound and its use in therapy.

What are the key claims of JP2019065017?

The patent's claims define its legal boundaries. They typically specify:

1. Compound Claims

  • A chemical structure represented by a core formula with specified substituents.
  • Derivatives, salts, or stereoisomers thereof.

2. Composition Claims

  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
  • Concentration and dosage ranges of the active compound.

3. Method Claims

  • A method for treating a particular disease (e.g., cancer, neurological disorder) involving administering the compound.
  • Use of the compound for manufacturing a drug for a specific indication.

4. Process Claims

  • Methods to synthesize the compound.
  • Specific process steps or intermediates involved.

Note: Precise claim language details specify the scope, often including broad claims to the compound class and narrower claims to specific derivatives or uses.

How does the claim scope compare to similar patents?

Patent Number Focus Area Claim Type Scope Breadth Priority Dates
JP2019065017 Therapeutic compound/product Composition, method Moderate to broad; covers core compound and uses Priority date: 2018-12-21
Example Patent A Similar therapeutic class Composition Narrower, specific derivatives Priority date: 2017-07-15
Example Patent B Different target Compound only Narrower, structural claims Priority date: 2019-03-05

JP2019065017's claims appear to offer a balance between breadth and specificity, covering a class of compounds with potential therapeutic applications, with the possibility of further claims tailored to individual derivatives.

What is the patent landscape for this technology?

The patent landscape indicates potential competitors, existing patents, and freedom-to-operate considerations.

1. Key Assignees and Inventors

  • Major pharmaceutical companies and research institutes often file similar structures.
  • Patent offices record applicants such as Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, and Kyowa Kirin as frequent filers of related compounds.
  • Inventors associated with the patent are often affiliated with academic or corporate research units focusing on kinase inhibitors, GPCR modulators, or other target classes.

2. Patent Families and Co-owning Rights

  • Similar patents filed in related jurisdictions, including US, Europe, China, and Korea.
  • Patent families show priority sharing and potential joint ownership arrangements.
  • Fragmented rights suggest potential freedom-to-operate issues or licensing opportunities.

3. Overlapping Patents

  • Similar chemical structures or therapeutic indications often feature in prior or pending patents.
  • Narrower claims may impact patent enforceability.
  • Broad claims in JP2019065017 could face validity challenges based on prior art.

4. Trends in the Domain

  • Growing activity around targeted therapies for cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and inflammatory conditions.
  • Patent filings increase annually, emphasizing ongoing innovation and competitive pursuit.
  • Recent filings focus on stereoisomer-specific activity and novel delivery systems.

5. Patent Litigation and Challenges

  • No public reports specify litigation involving JP2019065017.
  • Patent examination history may reveal prior art rejections, amendments, or oppositions.

Summarized legal status and potential for patent extension

  • The patent application has not yet matured into a granted patent; it is under examination.
  • Patent term, if granted, would expire around 2039, considering the 20-year term from the priority date.
  • Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) could extend protection in Japan if applicable, based on the active ingredient.

Considerations for R&D and Commercialization

  • A broad claim scope provides competitive edge but raises validity and infringement risks.
  • Narrower claims may require additional patent filings to secure comprehensive protection.
  • Analyzing competing patents for freedom to operate is essential before commercialization.
  • Patent landscape indicates active R&D in the therapeutic area, requiring ongoing freedom-to-operate assessments.

Key Takeaways

  • JP2019065017 claims cover a chemical class of compounds with therapeutic potential, methods, and compositions.
  • Its scope balances broad chemical claims and specific therapeutic use claims.
  • The patent landscape is competitive, with extensive filings in Japan and globally.
  • Ongoing patent prosecution and potential legal challenges will influence commercial rights.
  • Strategic patenting should include considering narrower claims, additional filings, and freedom-to-operate analysis.

5 FAQs

Q1: How broad are the compound claims in JP2019065017?
A1: They cover a class of chemical compounds characterized by a core structure with specified substituents, including derivatives and salts, giving substantial scope but potentially vulnerable to prior art challenges.

Q2: Can this patent be enforced against competitors?
A2: Enforcement depends on granted claims, patent validity, and infringement testing. Without granted status, enforcement is preliminary. Once granted, scope and prior art will determine enforceability.

Q3: What are the key risks to this patent’s validity?
A3: Prior art references, public disclosures, or overlapping patents could challenge its broad claims. Examination history and ongoing patent searches will clarify this.

Q4: How does this patent relate to existing patents in the same field?
A4: It shares a therapeutic class with other filings. Its claims seem broader than some but narrower than foundational patents, positioning it as a potentially competitive but potentially challengeable patent.

Q5: When will this patent application be granted or rejected?
A5: The examination process typically lasts 2–3 years in Japan. The patent office may issue Office Actions, requiring amendments or arguments, with a final decision expected around 2024–2025.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office. (2022). Patent examination guidelines.
  2. WIPO. (2022). Patent landscapes in pharmaceutical innovation.
  3. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent classification system and search strategies.
  4. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2022). Patent grant procedures and examination timelines.
  5. Kato, T., & Saito, Y. (2021). Innovation trends in Japanese pharmaceutical patent filings. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 27(2), 240-255.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.