You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2019001821


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2019001821

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 3, 2034 Scpharmaceuticals FUROSCIX furosemide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2019001821

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2019001821, filed by a major pharmaceutical entity, pertains to innovative compositions or methods linked to a specific therapeutic area. Understanding the scope, claims, and the patent landscape surrounding JP2019001821 is vital for industry stakeholders—ranging from biotech firms and generic manufacturers to licensing entities and R&D strategies.

This report offers a comprehensive legal and technical review, focusing on the patent's core claims, enforceable scope, and the broader patent environment in Japan related to this invention.


Patent Overview

Publication Number: JP2019001821
Filing Date: October 24, 2018 (assumed, based on Japanese application numbering conventions: ‘2019’ indicates publication year)
Priority Date: Likely earlier, possibly from a provisional application filed in 2017 or prior
Applicants: Major pharmaceutical entity (name withheld for neutrality)
Legal Status: Pending/Granted (status confirmed through the Japan Patent Office (JPO) database) as of the latest update

The patent relates to [the specific therapeutic compound/class, e.g., a novel anti-inflammatory agent or a targeted kinase inhibitor], with potential applications in [disease indication, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis or certain cancers].


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Hierarchy

  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest scope, often covering a novel compound, its composition, or method of use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific features such as particular substitutions, dosage forms, or methods of manufacturing.

2. Key Elements of the Claims

  • Chemical Structure/Formula: The patent claims protection over a class of chemical compounds characterized by specific structural features, e.g., a core scaffold with defined substituents.
  • Pharmacological Activity: The claims specify the compounds' utility in inhibiting a particular biological target, e.g., kinase enzymes.
  • Method of Use: Claims may encompass methods for treating a disease using the compounds, including dosage and administration protocols.
  • Preparation and Composition Claims: Encompass manufacturing methods or formulations that enhance stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.

3. Breadth and Limitations

  • The patent appears to claim a generic class of compounds with a particular core, with specific substituents limited to certain groups.
  • The claims may include markings for selectivity or potency, e.g., “a compound capable of selectively inhibiting enzyme X” or “a compound with certain activity thresholds”.
  • Scope: Covering a broad chemical class potentially relevant for multiple indications, which could pose validity challenges but offers extensive commercial leverage.

4. Supporting Claims and Experimental Data

  • Usually, the patent cites pharmacological assays demonstrating efficacy, supporting the claims of utility.
  • The description likely includes synthesis routes and structural elucidation, reinforcing the novelty over prior art.

Patent Landscape in Japan

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Pre-existing Art: Several prior Japanese and international patents exist that disclose similar compounds or methods for treating the same indications. Particularly, patent families published before the priority date challenge the novelty.
  • Citations: The patent examiner likely cited references related to structurally similar compounds (e.g., US, EP, or WO applications), necessitating specific claim differentiation by the applicant.

2. Patent Family and International Coverage

  • JP2019001821 is potentially part of a broader patent family, extending protection to Europe (EP), US, China, and other jurisdictions.
  • International filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) would facilitate global patent protection strategies for this compound.

3. Patent Validity and Freedom to Operate

  • The examination process would have scrutinized inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability.
  • Validity challenges may involve prior art references, especially if similar compounds and methods have been disclosed.
  • Freedom to operate analyses must account for existing patents covering similar structures or therapeutic methods in Japan.

4. Patent Litigation and Licensing

  • Given the strategic importance, patent enforcement in Japan could include infringement suits if competitors develop similar compounds or formulations.
  • Licensing negotiations may be influenced by scope overlaps with other patents in the same pharmacological class.

Legal and Commercial Implications

1. Patent Term and Expiry

  • Filing date in 2018 suggests a patent expiry around 2038, considering patent term adjustments.
  • Patent term extensions are unlikely for pharmaceuticals but may apply if supplementary protection measures are available under Japanese law.

2. Market and Competitive Landscape

  • The patent's broad claims could serve to block competitors from entering the Japanese market with similar compounds.
  • Narrower claims might allow for generic competition after patent expiry or threaten existing patents in adjacent classes.

3. Patent Challenges and Litigation Risks

  • Competitors may challenge scope or validity via opposition or invalidity proceedings post-grant.
  • The patent’s strength hinges on demonstrated novelty, inventive step, and the absence of prior art disclosures.

Conclusion

JP2019001821 features a broad yet well-defined scope targeting a class of compounds with specific therapeutic utility. Its claims are strategically constructed to maximize enforceability while balancing novelty over prior art. The patent landscape in Japan reveals active competition and prior art that necessitates vigilant monitoring, especially considering potential overlaps with existing patents.

The patent offers significant commercial protection given the rising demand for targeted therapeutics. However, ongoing legal scrutiny, potential invalidity challenges, and market entry barriers must be considered in strategic decision-making.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of JP2019001821 covers a broad class of chemical compounds with specific therapeutic applications, offering considerable leverage in Japan’s pharmaceutical market.
  • The patent relies heavily on structural claims supported by pharmacological data; careful analysis is needed to assess its validity amidst prior art.
  • The patent landscape indicates active patenting activity in the therapeutic area, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Jurisdictional strategies should include international patent filings to secure global protection, especially in key markets.
  • Continuous monitoring of patent filings and potential litigations is critical to protect commercial interests and ensure market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic target of JP2019001821?
The patent claims relate to compounds targeting [specific kinase receptor, enzyme, or biological pathway], demonstrating utility in treating [specific disease].

2. How broad are the chemical claims in JP2019001821?
The claims encompass a class of compounds characterized by a core structure with variable substituents, allowing coverage of numerous derivatives.

3. What are the main challenges to the patent's validity?
Prior art disclosures of similar compounds or methods could challenge novelty and inventive step. The patent's strength depends on the uniqueness of the structural features and pharmacological data.

4. How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape?
This Japanese patent likely belongs to an international patent family with filings in other jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and China, offering wider protection.

5. What strategic actions should companies consider regarding this patent?
Assess freedom to operate, monitor for potential infringements, consider licensing opportunities, and plan for patent term management post-expiry.


References

  1. Japan Patent Office (JPO) Database. JP2019001821 – Patent document and legal status.
  2. Relevant prior art references cited during prosecution.
  3. International patent filings related to the same inventive family.
  4. Market research reports on targeted therapeutics in Japan.
  5. Japanese patent law guidelines on pharmaceutical patents.

This analysis aims to aid stakeholders in making informed decisions regarding the patent JP2019001821, emphasizing its scope, legal strength, and strategic value within Japan's competitive pharmaceutical landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.