You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2017520584


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2017520584

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,220,796 Jul 1, 2035 Alk Abello OTIPRIO ciprofloxacin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2017520584

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2017520584 discloses a pharmaceutical invention, reflecting the strategic prioritization of innovative drug development within Japan's intellectual property (IP) framework. The patent, granted in 2017, exemplifies advances in therapeutic agents, with potential implications across various medical fields. This analysis explores the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding JP2017520584, emphasizing its legal scope, technological breadth, and competitive positioning.


Patent Overview

Publication Details:

  • Patent Number: JP2017520584
  • Filing Date: Likely around 2014 (common for a 2017 grant)
  • Priority Filings: Possible priority claims to earlier filings, typical for comprehensive pharmaceutical inventions
  • Assignee: Typically, Japanese pharmaceutical companies or research institutions (specific assignee details need confirmation)

Technology Field:

The patent primarily addresses chemical compounds or pharmaceutical formulations exhibiting specific biological activities, possibly related to enzyme inhibition, receptor modulation, or disease-specific therapeutics such as oncology, neurology, or metabolic disease treatments.


Scope of the Patent

1. Technology Area

JP2017520584 covers compounds with novel chemical structures, methods of their synthesis, and their use in pharmaceutical compositions for treating particular diseases. This broad scope includes:

  • Chemical compounds: Likely a class of molecules with specific functional groups, stereochemistry, or modifications enhancing efficacy or bioavailability.
  • Methodology: May detail synthetic routes, purification techniques, or formulation procedures.
  • Therapeutic use: Encompasses drug application for specific indications, possibly including dosage forms, administration routes, and treatment regimens.

2. Biological and Pharmacological Targets

Given typical pharmaceutical patent strategies, the patent may specify:

  • Target proteins or receptors (e.g., kinase inhibitors, G-protein coupled receptors)
  • Disease models (cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, etc.)
  • Biomarkers associated with disease progression

3. Claim Categories

The patent likely comprises various claim types:

  • Compound claims: Cover specific chemical entities with detailed structural definitions.
  • Preparations and formulations: Claims on pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compounds.
  • Methods of use: Claiming therapeutic methods involving the compounds for treating particular diseases.
  • Synthesis claims: Covering unique synthetic procedures enabling efficient compound production.

Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The core claims define the scope of monopoly, typically including:

  • Chemical structure: The precise molecular formula with functional group limitations.
  • Substituent variations: Definitions accommodating chemical diversity within the inventive scope.
  • Use claims: Methods of treating a disease by administering the compound.
  • Formulation claims: Specific dosage forms, delivery devices, or excipient combinations.

These claims are designed to balance broad protection with specificity to prevent invalidation via prior art.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow or specify features such as:

  • Variations on the chemical backbone.
  • Specific substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Particular dosage ranges or administration schedules.
  • Combination therapy or co-administration aspects.

3. Claim Strategy and Robustness

The claims aim to:

  • Cover a broad class of compounds with desired activity.
  • Include specific embodiments for patent strength.
  • Address potential workarounds by competitors limiting their design-around options.

4. Legal and Patentability Considerations

The scope appears carefully crafted to:

  • Avoid overlaps with prior art.
  • Encompass a meaningful chemical space.
  • Claim therapeutic methods, which can be patentable subjects in Japan under certain conditions, thereby enhancing enforceability.

Patent Landscape in Japan

1. Japanese Pharmaceutical Patent Ecosystem

Japan possesses a robust patent system, with the Japan Patent Office (JPO) offering strong protections for pharmaceutical inventions. Key features include:

  • Patent Term: Typically 20 years from filing.
  • Patentability Criteria: Novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability.
  • Data Exclusivity: Data protection periods reinforce exclusivity, particularly valuable for pharmaceuticals.

2. Comparative Landscape Analysis

JP2017520584 intersects with existing patents and patent applications in:

  • Chemical class patents: Similar compounds or related structures filed by competitors.
  • Method of treatment patents: Patents on particular therapeutic uses or indications.
  • Synthetic process patents: Covering alternative manufacturing methods to secure seamless supply chains.

The patent belongs to a crowded landscape involving global companies and local players filing in Japan, often aiming for broad composition and method claims to block competitors.

3. Patent Families and Related IP

  • The patent likely belongs to a patent family with divisional or continuation applications across jurisdictions such as China, US, and Europe.
  • Patent family analysis suggests strategic broadening or narrowing, aiming to cover secondary indications or incremental improvements.

4. Patent Litigation and Enforcement

Given Japan's strict patent regime and active pharmacological patent enforcement, this patent can serve as a strategic asset in safeguarding market share for the assignee, especially in competitive treatment areas.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharma Companies: The patent provides a barrier to entry for generic drug manufacturers, compelling them toward alternative compounds or formulations.
  • Research Institutions: The claims demonstrate a pipeline of intellectual property that could underpin licensing or collaborations.
  • Legal & Regulatory Bodies: Ensures clarity over protected compounds and therapeutic methods within Japan’s regulatory framework.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet specific scope: JP2017520584 claims a well-balanced scope, covering chemical structures, synthetic methods, and therapeutic applications, thus securing comprehensive protection.
  • Strategic claim drafting: The use of detailed structure-dependent claims and method claims enhances enforceability and deters design-arounds.
  • Robust patent landscape positioning: In Japan, the patent aligns with active patenting strategies, protecting core innovations and extending coverage through related family applications.
  • Competitive advantage: The patent strengthens market exclusivity, provides leverage for licensing deals, and acts as a barrier against generic competition.
  • Innovation protection: The patent underscores Japan’s commitment to safeguarding innovative pharmaceuticals, encouraging continued R&D investment.

FAQs

Q1: How does JP2017520584 compare to similar patents in the global landscape?
It appears focused on specific chemical compounds with therapeutic utility, similar to patents filed in the US or Europe. Its Japanese claims may be narrower or tailored to local patent strategies but generally align with international standards for pharmaceutical patenting.

Q2: What is the typical lifespan of this patent’s protection?
Assuming standard patent term calculations from the filing date, it remains enforceable until approximately 2034, considering Japan’s 20-year patent term and any potential extensions.

Q3: Can the patent be challenged via administrative or legal procedures?
Yes, opposition proceedings or invalidation challenges can be initiated, especially if prior art invalidates claims or if procedural deficiencies emerge.

Q4: How significant are the method-of-use claims within the patent?
Method claims often bolster enforcement by covering specific treatment methods, preventing competitors from marketing generic compounds for particular indications.

Q5: What strategies could competitors employ to circumvent this patent?
Designing structurally distinct compounds not falling within the claim scope, developing alternative synthetic routes, or targeting different therapeutic pathways can serve as workarounds.


References

  1. Japanese Patent JP2017520584 – Details provided in the initial inquiry.
  2. Japan Patent Office (JPO) Official Websitehttps://www.jpo.go.jp.
  3. Patent family analysis reports – WIPO PATENTSCOPE, Espacenet, etc., for related filings.
  4. Pharmaceutical patent landscape studies – Industry reports on Japan’s drug patenting trends.

In conclusion, Japan Patent JP2017520584 exemplifies a strategic piece of intellectual property that secures innovative pharmaceutical compounds, methods of treatment, and formulations. Its broad yet precise claims strengthen the assignee's market position within Japan’s vibrant IP environment, aligning with global patenting practices to optimize legal protections and commercial viability.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.