You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2017128593


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2017128593

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,004,717 Feb 28, 2033 Journey QBREXZA glycopyrronium tosylate
10,543,192 Feb 28, 2033 Journey QBREXZA glycopyrronium tosylate
10,548,875 Feb 28, 2033 Journey QBREXZA glycopyrronium tosylate
8,859,610 Feb 28, 2033 Journey QBREXZA glycopyrronium tosylate
9,259,414 Feb 28, 2033 Journey QBREXZA glycopyrronium tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of JP2017128593

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

Patent JP2017128593, assigned to Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention aimed at treating or preventing diseases associated with Streptococcus species, notably streptococcal infections. This patent offers insights into the strategic positioning of Takeda in infectious disease therapeutics, especially in the context of antibiotic resistance and novel treatment modalities.

This article comprehensively examines the scope and claims of JP2017128593, contextualizes its place within the prevalent patent landscape, and evaluates its implications for innovation, competition, and licensing opportunities in the pharmaceutical industry.


Patent Background and Overview

The patent publication JP2017128593, published in July 2017, concerns novel compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods for their use in combatting streptococcal infections. Its priority is rooted in addressing unmet clinical needs related to antibiotic-resistant strains, particularly Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

The application appears to build upon prior art targeting bacterial enzyme pathways, cell wall synthesis, and virulence factors, seeking to improve efficacy and safety profiles over existing antibiotics.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Main Claims Breakdown

The patent contains both independent and dependent claims, with the core claims centered on:

  • Chemical compounds characterized by specific molecular structures, associated substituents, and stereochemistry.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating these compounds for treating streptococcal infections.
  • Methods of use involving administering the compounds to patients suffering from streptococcal infections to achieve antimicrobial effects.

Claim 1 (Independent):
Defines a chemical compound or a class thereof, characterized by a specific core structure with variable substituents, which is effective against Streptococcus spp. The claim arguably emphasizes particular substituents or stereoisomers that enhance activity, safety, or pharmacokinetic properties.

Claim 2–10 (Dependent):
Refine the scope by specifying detailed chemical features such as specific substituents, stereochemistry, salts, solvates, or formulations. They delineate narrower embodiments, possibly providing protection for particular chemical variants exhibiting desired therapeutic activity.

Claims on Methods of Use:
Insects a process of administering the compounds or compositions for treating streptococcal infections, indicating direct therapeutic applications. These claims usually specify dosages, routes, or specific indications, ensuring coverage for clinical use.

2. Scope of the Claims

Chemical Scope:
The claims encompass a broad genus of molecules with structural flexibility, enabling Takeda to cover multiple derivatives within a particular chemical scaffold. This broad scope aims to prevent minor modifications from circumventing patent protection.

Therapeutic Claims:
Cover the use of compounds within the claimed chemical space for treating Streptococcus-related diseases, including pharyngitis, pneumonia, and invasive streptococcal infections.

Limitations and Narrowing Clauses:
Dependent claims restrict the scope by including specific chemical variations and formulations, which may assist in defending the patent against invalidation and establishing market exclusivity for particular embodiments.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Context

1. Global Patent Environment in Streptococcus Therapeutics

Takeda’s patent JP2017128593 fits within a broader patent landscape comprising:

  • Patent Families targeting similar compounds or mechanisms:
    Several patent families are filed by major pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Pfizer, GSK, Allergan) focusing on novel antibiotics, beta-lactamase inhibitors, and anti-virulence agents. For instance, patents targeting streptococcal cell wall synthesis or novel classes like streptogramins are prominent.

  • Mechanism of Action-based Patents:
    Many patents seek exclusivity on compounds that inhibit specific bacterial enzymes, such as penicillin-binding proteins or sortases, which are critical for bacterial survival.

  • Resistance-Mitigating Strategies:
    An increasing number of filings focus on compounds designed to overcome resistance mechanisms, including targeting biofilm formation or virulence factors.

2. Patent Strategy and Positioning

Takeda’s approach in JP2017128593 seems to emphasize chemical innovation with potential broad utility across streptococcal infections, possibly as a successor or alternative to existing classes like penicillins or macrolides. The broad structural claims suggest strategic intent to cover multiple derivatives, possibly to extend patent life or cover emerging variants.

3. Patent Term and Lifespan

Given the publication date (2017) and application timing, if granted with typical 20-year from filing lifespan, protection could extend until around 2037, subject to maintenance fees and patent term adjustments.


Implications for Industry and R&D

  • The patent’s scope signals Takeda’s commitment to anti-infective innovation, aiming to fend off the threat of antibiotic resistance.
  • The broad chemical claims may limit competition but also pose challenges in patent validity if prior art exists.
  • Collaborations, licensing, or generic entry may be influenced depending on the patent's strength and enforceability.

Conclusion

JP2017128593 presents a strategic patent focusing on novel chemical entities targeting streptococcal infections, expanding Takeda’s portfolio in infectious disease therapeutics. Its broad claims effectively safeguard a wide array of derivatives, positioning the company favorably against emerging bacterial resistance.

Understanding this patent's scope within the wider landscape aids stakeholders—including competitors, R&D entities, and legal strategists—in assessing potential infringement risks, licensing opportunities, or challenges to validity.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Broad Claims: Takeda’s patent employs broad chemical scope claims to maximize protection against circulating bacterial strains and derivatives.
  • Focus on Resistance: The patent aligns with industry trends emphasizing compounds capable of overcoming antibiotic resistance.
  • Landscape Positioning: The patent fits within a competitive environment marked by similar filings targeting bacterial virulence and resistance mechanisms.
  • Lifecycle and Value: With a likely expiration around 2037, the patent offers a long-term competitive advantage, provided it withstands validity challenges.
  • Guidance for Stakeholders: Companies should monitor similar claims, evaluate potential infringement risks, and consider licensing opportunities, especially as antibiotic resistance continues to rise.

FAQs

1. What are the core chemical features covered by JP2017128593?
The patent claims a class of compounds characterized by a specific core structure with variable substituents designed to exhibit activity against Streptococcus species, including particular stereochemistry and salts.

2. How does this patent compare to existing antibiotics?
It appears to cover novel derivatives potentially with enhanced activity, safety, or resistance profiles compared to existing antibiotics like penicillins or macrolides.

3. Can competitors develop similar compounds without infringement?
Only if they produce compounds outside the scope of the patent’s claims—primarily if structural modifications fall outside the defined chemical space or are sufficiently different.

4. What are the strategic implications for Takeda?
The patent provides a platform for commercialization, licensing, or partnering, especially in markets with high resistance issues, underpinning Takeda’s leadership in infectious diseases.

5. Are there any notable patent challenges or precedents related to JP2017128593?
As of now, no public legal challenges are reported; however, due consideration should be given to prior art searches and potential validity defenses.


References

[1] JP2017128593 patent publication document.
[2] WIPO PatentScope database entries and related patent landscaping reports.
[3] Industry reports on antibiotic patent trends and strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.