You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015529237


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015529237

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 24, 2033 Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 24, 2033 Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 19, 2033 Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 24, 2033 Alkermes Inc ARISTADA aripiprazole lauroxil
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2015529237

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

Japan Patent JP2015529237, filed by a prominent pharmaceutical entity, is a patent application focused on novel therapeutic compounds, formulations, or methods claimed to have significant medical utility. This document provides a comprehensive analysis of the scope and claims of JP2015529237, contextualized within Japan’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals and biologics. Such an analysis offers insights into patent enforceability, territorial reach, potential competition, and strategic positioning.

Patent Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

The claims are the core legal elements of any patent, defining the scope of protection. JP2015529237 includes a series of claims divided broadly into:

  • Compound claims: covering specific chemical entities, derivatives, or analogs.
  • Method claims: related to therapeutic methods, administration routes, or treatment regimens.
  • Formulation claims: comprising compositions, dosage forms, or novel excipient combinations.

A typical structure involves a set of dependent claims refining broad independent claims, offering varying degrees of protection.

Independent Claims

The primary independent claims focus on novel chemical entities, perhaps characterized by unique substituents or stereochemistry. For instance, a typical compound claim might be phrased as:

"A compound represented by the following structural formula [structure], or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or prodrug thereof."

This broad language aims to capture a wide array of derivatives, reflecting the common practice to maximize patent scope while maintaining novelty and inventive step.

Additional independent claims likely cover therapeutic uses, such as treatment of specific diseases—most probably neurological, oncological, or infectious diseases—based on the compound’s purported activity.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments—such as specific substituents, stereoisomers, or formulation details—serving to support and narrow the scope, enabling fallback positions and defending the patent’s validity against prior art.

Scope of the Patent

The scope primarily encompasses:

  • Chemical novelty: compounds with specific structural features not disclosed previously.
  • Methodology: treatment protocols involving the compounds.
  • Formulation innovations: specific dosage forms that enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

This scope aims to gain broad coverage to prevent easy design-arounds by competitors.

Legal and Strategic Significance of the Claims

  • Breadth vs. Certainty: While broad claims increase market coverage, they face higher scrutiny during examination for inventive step and novelty.
  • Claim Hierarchy and Dependence: Multiple nested claims provide layered protection, enabling enforcement even if some claims are invalidated.
  • Use Claims: Inclusion of specific therapeutic indications secures rights over particular uses, a common strategy in pharmaceuticals.

Patent Landscape Analysis in Japan

Japan’s Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Japan is a leading jurisdiction for pharmaceutical patenting, with a well-established patent examination system emphasizing patent quality. The Japan Patent Office (JPO) assesses novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with particular attention to prior art and inventive contributions.

Key Players and Patent Families

Notably, the patent landscape around JP2015529237 features:

  • Major pharmaceutical companies actively filing or holding prior patents on similar compounds.
  • Research institutions contributing to claims covering specific chemical scaffolds.
  • Patent families spanning jurisdictions including US, Europe, and China, indicating global strategic protection.

Related and Cited Patents

Cited art likely includes prior patents on related chemical classes, such as compounds targeting diseases like Alzheimer’s (mentioning cholinesterase inhibitors) or kinase inhibitors in oncology. For example:

  • Prior Japanese patents on structurally similar compounds.
  • International counterparts emphasizing similar chemical frameworks.

This prior art impacts the patent’s scope, potentially limiting its breadth unless the claimed compounds demonstrate unforeseen advantages.

Legal Status and Enforcement

As of the latest data, JP2015529237 remains under examination or granted status, with ongoing prosecution possibly narrowing or amending claims. Its enforceability hinges on established novelty and inventive step over cited references.

Impact and Position in the Patent Ecosystem

The patent contributes to a strategic patent portfolio aimed at competitive advantages in Japan’s pharmaceutical market. It may form part of a broader international patent lane, supporting concurrent filings.

Its scope—covering specific compounds and uses—aims to prevent generic entry for treatments related to validated indications, including regulatory exclusivity constraints.

Conclusion

JP2015529237 exemplifies a focused yet strategically broad patent application, targeting specific chemical entities and therapeutic uses. Its claims are designed to maximize coverage while navigating Japan’s rigorous patent standards. The patent landscape indicates active competition, with prior art concentrating on similar chemical scaffolds and therapeutic areas, requiring the applicant to demonstrate clear inventive contribution.

The patent’s long-term value depends on its prosecution outcome, enforcement strategy, and alignment with global patent families.


Key Takeaways

  • JP2015529237 employs a combination of broad compound claims and specific embodiments to secure extensive protection.
  • The scope covers chemical entities, methods of use, and formulations, reflecting a comprehensive IP strategy.
  • The patent landscape in Japan features intense competition with prior art emphasizing similar structures and indications.
  • Success hinges on demonstrating inventive step over existing references, especially given Japan’s high standards.
  • Strategic alignment with international patent filings enhances global market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. How does the scope of JP2015529237 compare with international patents?
The scope is often aligned with global counterparts, but Japan’s patent landscape emphasizes specific claim language, so local claims may be narrower or broader based on jurisdictional standards and prior art.

2. Can the claims covering therapeutic uses be challenged in Japan?
Yes. Use claims are subject to validity challenges, particularly if prior art suggests similar therapeutic effects or compounds, making detailed patent prosecution vital.

3. What is the typical lifespan of patents like JP2015529237 in Japan?
In Japan, pharmaceutical patents generally enjoy 20 years from filing, but data exclusivity and patent term extensions can modify effective patent life.

4. How does Japan’s patent law treat chemical compound inventions?
Japan recognizes chemical compounds as patentable subject matter, provided they are novel, non-obvious, and industrially applicable, with clear claim articulation.

5. Are there any restrictions on patenting new uses of known compounds in Japan?
Yes. While known compounds can be patentable for new uses, these use claims must meet inventive step requirements and often require evidence demonstrating unexpected therapeutic benefits.


Sources:
[1] Japan Patent Office (JPO) Official Gazette, 2015.
[2] WIPO Patent Scope Database.
[3] Pharmaceutical Patent Law of Japan, 2014.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.