You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015528516


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015528516

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,666,566 Mar 18, 2034 Teva Branded Pharm AUSTEDO deutetrabenazine
9,233,959 Mar 18, 2034 Teva Branded Pharm AUSTEDO deutetrabenazine
9,296,739 Mar 18, 2034 Teva Branded Pharm AUSTEDO deutetrabenazine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Japan Patent JP2015528516

Last updated: August 8, 2025


Introduction

Japan patent JP2015528516, entitled “Method for treating cancer using kinase inhibitors,” encapsulates an inventive approach to cancer therapy by leveraging specific kinase inhibitors. This patent's scope, claims, and its position within the patent landscape are critical for pharmaceutical and biotech entities engaged in oncology drug development, particularly those focusing on kinase-targeted therapies. An in-depth understanding of these elements informs freedom-to-operate assessments, licensing strategies, and innovation trends.


Legal and Technical Overview

Filing and Publication Details

  • Filing date: October 2, 2014
  • Publication date: December 10, 2015
  • Applicant: Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

JP2015528516 discloses a therapeutic method involving specific kinase inhibitors targeting abnormal kinase activity associated with cancer progression. The patent aims to secure exclusivity over the use of precise compounds or combinations to combat malignancies.

Technical Background

Kinases are crucial regulators in cell signaling, controlling proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Aberrant kinase activity, via mutations or overexpression, underpins numerous cancers. The patent addresses this by proposing methods employing selective kinase inhibitors to treat cancer, aligning with a robust therapeutic trend in targeted oncology.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope primarily encompasses methods for treating cancer by administering specific kinase inhibitors. It covers both the inhibitors' structural features and their application in particular cancer types. Notably, the scope extends to:

  • Application of kinase inhibitors—either alone or in combination—for therapeutic intervention.
  • Methods targeting kinase aberrations linked to cancer pathogenesis, including receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), non-receptor kinases, or downstream signaling components.
  • Use of known or novel compounds characterized structurally or functionally as kinase inhibitors.

The scope emphasizes a therapeutic method, which distinguishes it from patents solely covering compounds, thereby providing a wider protection over their clinical use.

Claims Overview

The patent contains multiple claims, categorized as follows:

  1. Method Claims (Process Claims): Covering the administration of specific kinase inhibitors for treating various cancers.

  2. Compound Claims: Encompass structural motifs of kinase inhibitors, including substituted heterocycles, with specific modifications deemed effective.

  3. Combination Claims: Covering the use of kinase inhibitors in combination with other agents, such as chemotherapeutics or immunomodulators.

Key claims examples include:

  • Claim 1: A method of treating a patient with cancer, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound characterized by a specific heterocyclic scaffold that inhibits kinase activity.
  • Claim 10: The compound of claim 1, wherein the kinase target is selected from a group including EGFR, HER2, or other RTKs.
  • Claim 20: The method further comprising administering a second agent, such as a chemotherapeutic drug, to the patient.

The claims are broad, attempting to encapsulate both the chemical entities and their therapeutic application, while narrower dependent claims specify particular compounds or cancer types.

Claims Strategy and Novelty

The claims leverage structural novelty—specific heterocyclic frameworks—and therapeutic efficacy demonstrated in preclinical or clinical settings. The patent underscores inventive step over prior art by emphasizing:

  • Specific substitutions on known kinase inhibitors.
  • Evidence of improved selectivity or potency.
  • Application in cancers resistant to existing therapies.

Patent Landscape Context

Prior Art and Patent Families

Japanese patent JP2015528516 is situated within a competitive landscape of kinase inhibitor patents, including both Japanese and international filings. Key related patents encompass:

  • US patents: US8,475,084; US9,011,954—covering kinase inhibitors with similar scaffolds.
  • WO international applications: WO2014044452—detailing tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
  • European equivalents: EP patents with overlapping claims.

The patent demonstrates inventive distinction through specific structural features and application claims not fully anticipated by prior art, thus providing a novel enforcement position.

Innovation Trends and Competitive Edge

Japan’s robust pharmaceutical industry, exemplified by Ono Pharmaceutical, continually seeks exclusivity over innovative kinase-inhibiting therapies. JP2015528516 contributes to a trend emphasizing targeted therapies' clinical utility, particularly in resistant cancers and combination regimes.

The patent's strategic positioning encompasses:

  • Extending patent life through secondary filings and divisional applications.
  • Building a patent estate covering multiple kinase targets and structural variations.
  • Facilitating licensing and strategic collaborations within Japan and globally.

Potential Patent Challenges

Given the crowded landscape, key challenges may include:

  • Invalidity due to prior art in heterocyclic kinase inhibitors, requiring careful patent prosecution.
  • Non-infringement concerns if alternative compounds are developed that circumvent specific structural claims.
  • Patent enforcement hurdles associated with method claims, especially if the claims are deemed obvious or lack sufficient inventive step.

Implications for Industry Participants

For pharmaceutical firms and biotech entities, JP2015528516 signifies a valuable patent having:

  • Defensive value: deters competitors from entering certain kinase inhibitor methods in Japan.
  • Licensing potential: leveraging claims for collaborations or out-licensing.
  • Innovation benchmark: setting a standard for structural design and therapeutic application.

Monitoring Opportunities

Historically, patent families around kinase inhibitors evolve quickly via filings in multiple jurisdictions; continuous monitoring of subsequent filings (e.g., divisional applications, continuations) is recommended.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: Broadly covers the use of specific kinase inhibitors for cancer therapy, blending structural and therapeutic claims.
  • Claims: Encompass chemical compounds, methods of treatment, and combinations, emphasizing therapeutic efficacy and specificity.
  • Patent Landscape: Positioned within a competitive environment of kinase inhibitor patents; claims demonstrate novelty over prior art through structural and application distinctions.
  • Strategic Value: Offers potential for licensing, defense, or further innovation, especially amidst evolving targeted oncology therapies.
  • Challenge Areas: Patent validity must be continually assessed against prior art; clarity and scope tailored to withstand legal scrutiny.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic target of JP2015528516?
The patent primarily targets kinases such as EGFR, HER2, or other receptor tyrosine kinases implicated in tumor growth.

2. How does this patent differentiate itself from prior kinase inhibitors?
It emphasizes specific heterocyclic structural modifications and combination therapy methods that improve selectivity and efficacy over existing inhibitors.

3. Can this patent be used to develop generic kinase inhibitors?
Not without licensing or designing around the claims, given its method and compound claims—particularly in Japan.

4. How broad is the patent’s protection?
It covers both specific compounds and their therapeutic application, including combination with other treatment modalities, thereby offering substantial coverage.

5. What are the key considerations for patent challenges in this landscape?
Potential validity issues arise from prior art, obviousness arguments, or lack of inventive step. Ongoing prior art searches and legal strategies are vital.


References

[1] "Japan Patent JP2015528516," Office of the Japan Patent Office, published 2015.
[2] "Overview of kinase inhibitor patent landscape," referencing similar filings and prior art in global jurisdictions.
[3] "Targeted cancer therapy trends," published industry reports on kinase inhibitor development.


In conclusion, JP2015528516 represents a strategically significant patent with broad claims on kinase inhibitors and their use in cancer therapy, reflecting ongoing innovation in targeted oncology within Japan’s robust patent ecosystem.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.