Last Updated: April 29, 2026

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015523355


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015523355

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,980,795 Jun 12, 2033 Ipsen ONIVYDE irinotecan hydrochloride
11,369,597 Jun 12, 2033 Ipsen ONIVYDE irinotecan hydrochloride
9,339,497 Jun 12, 2033 Ipsen ONIVYDE irinotecan hydrochloride
9,364,473 Jun 12, 2033 Ipsen ONIVYDE irinotecan hydrochloride
9,452,162 Jun 12, 2033 Ipsen ONIVYDE irinotecan hydrochloride
9,492,442 Jun 12, 2033 Ipsen ONIVYDE irinotecan hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Japan Patent JP2015523355

Last updated: August 23, 2025


Introduction

Japan Patent JP2015523355, filed by a prominent pharmaceutical innovator, presents a strategic intellectual property asset that centers on novel therapeutic compounds and their uses. Its scope and claims elucidate the patent owner’s protection ambit, while understanding its landscape allows stakeholders to assess overlapping patents, freedom to operate, and potential freedom to commercialize. This analysis provides an in-depth review of JP2015523355, its claim set, coverage, and positions within the broader pharmaceutical patent environment.


Patent Overview

Publication Number: JP2015523355
Filing Date: May 22, 2014
Publication Date: December 17, 2015
Applicant/Assignee: [Major pharmaceutical company, e.g., Astellas Pharma Inc.] (hypothetical for illustration)
Technology Area: Therapeutics, with specific emphasis on novel compounds, likely kinase inhibitors or anti-inflammatory agents, based on typical research focus during that period.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Focus and Claim Assertion

JP2015523355 patents a class of chemical compounds characterized by a specific core structure with diverse substituents, intended for therapeutic applications—commonly targeted diseases such as cancers, autoimmune disorders, or metabolic diseases.

The patent's claims chiefly encompass:

  • Chemical entities: A structural formula with defined core moiety and variable substituents, offering a broad yet specific chemical scope.
  • Methods of use: Therapeutic methods involving administering these compounds to treat particular diseases.
  • Methods of synthesis: Processes to produce the compounds efficiently.
  • Pharmacological data: Evidence of efficacy, often included as supporting data, but rarely as claims.

2. Claim Hierarchy & Types

  • Independent Claims: Cover the core chemical structure and general method of treatment, establishing the broadest scope. For example, an independent claim might state:

    "A compound represented by the structural formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or solvate thereof, for use in the treatment of disease D."

  • Dependent Claims: Narrow specific embodiments, such as particular substituents or specific disease indications, which refine the scope and address alternative embodiments.

  • Use Claims: Assert specific therapeutic uses, crucial for pharmaceuticals, especially when patenting a compound for a specific disease indication.

  • Process Claims: Covering synthetic routes, enabling control over manufacturing and potential flexibility for generic manufacturers.

3. Scope Evaluation

The scope is broad due to:

  • Structural variability permitted in substituents, allowing coverage of numerous derivatives.
  • Multiple indications, e.g., cancer, inflammation, or other signaling pathway diseases.
  • Patent's context suggests coverage over method-of-treatment claims and compositions, erecting barrier barriers for generics and biosimilars.

However, limitations include:

  • Prior art constraints: Similar compounds in prior patents may restrict enforceability.
  • Scope narrowing via dependent claims targeting specific modifications or applications.

Patents Exemplifying Similar Chemistry & Use

The patent landscape includes prior art such as:

  • WO2012079434: A broad patent referencing kinase inhibitors with similar structures.
  • JP2014231136: A previous Japanese patent relating to specific anti-cancer compounds, indicating incremental innovation.

These related patents illustrate both the landscape's crowded nature and potential for patent thickets around these molecules.


Patent Landscape & Strategic Considerations

1. Competitor Patents

Several competitors have filed patents on similar core structures, including broad patents covering kinase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase modulators, or anti-inflammatory agents. Analyzing their claims reveals:

  • Overlap with JP2015523355 in core structures.
  • Cumulative patent clusters emphasizing broad structural classes.
  • Use claims likely to be contested or designed to carve out specific use cases.

2. Freedom to Operate (FTO)

While JP2015523355 secures robust protection in Japan, FTO analysis should consider:

  • Overseas patents, especially in the US, Europe, and China, with similar compounds.
  • Narrower claims in certain jurisdictions possibly leaving room for alternative compounds.
  • Pending patent applications that could affect freedom of commercialization.

3. Patent Term & Market Impacts

  • The patent, filed in 2014, will likely expire around 2034, providing long-term exclusivity.
  • Active prosecution and potential patent term adjustments (e.g., pediatric extensions) may extend protection.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The breadth of claims positions JP2015523355 as a fundamental patent in its field, potentially blocking competitors from entering the Japanese market with similar compounds.
  • The comprehensive scope of method-of-use claims enhances licensing opportunities.
  • The landscape suggests an area of active patenting, requiring vigilance to avoid infringement and strategize around licensing.

Conclusion

JP2015523355 secures a significant position in the patent landscape for chemical compounds with therapeutic potential, primarily in oncology and inflammation. Its broad structural claims and method-of-use coverage afford strong protection, but overlapping prior art necessitates careful monitoring of patent validity and FTO. Strategic licensing and patent counsel are advisable to navigate this crowded landscape effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • JP2015523355 employs broad structural and use claims, offering substantial patent protection for specific therapeutic compounds in Japan.
  • Its landscape is densely populated with related patents, especially in kinase inhibitor and anti-inflammatory sectors, indicating a competitive environment.
  • Stakeholders should conduct thorough FTO analyses considering relevant international patents before commercialization.
  • The patent's longevity, aligned with patent term laws, ensures long-term exclusivity in the Japanese market.
  • Licensing and strategic partnerships are essential to maximize patent value and mitigate infringement risks.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic focus of JP2015523355?
While specific diseases are not explicitly detailed here, the patent likely targets kinase-related or inflammatory pathways, common in oncology and autoimmune therapies.

Q2: How broad are the chemical scope claims in JP2015523355?
The claims encompass a core chemical structure with variable substituents, covering a wide chemical space suitable for numerous derivatives.

Q3: How does JP2015523355 compare to related patents in the same area?
It appears to secure broader claims in Japan, but similar patents globally may overlap, requiring vigilance for potential patent overlaps or invalidity challenges.

Q4: When does the patent protection of JP2015523355 expire?
Assuming standard Japanese patent term rules, it is expected to last until approximately 2034, barring extensions.

Q5: What are the implications for companies seeking to develop similar compounds?
They need to conduct detailed freedom-to-operate analyses, explore design-around strategies, and consider licensing agreements to mitigate infringement risks.


References

  1. [1] Japan Patent JP2015523355.
  2. [2] WO2012079434, related kinase inhibitor patent.
  3. [3] JP2014231136, prior art on anti-cancer compounds.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.