You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Japan Patent: 2015212291


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Japan Patent: 2015212291

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,888,547 Jan 31, 2031 Genzyme Corp CERDELGA eliglustat tartrate
11,458,119 Nov 24, 2030 Genzyme Corp CERDELGA eliglustat tartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Patent JP2015212291: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 10, 2025

Introduction

Patent JP2015212291 is a Japanese patent application related to a drug or pharmaceutical composition. To contextualize its significance, understanding the scope and claims, as well as its position within the overall patent landscape, is crucial for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and R&D strategists. This analysis offers an in-depth review of the patent's claims, its technical scope, preceding patent art, and its relevance within Japan’s pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.

Patent Overview

JP2015212291 was published on December 24, 2015, with priority claims dating back to 2014. The patent application focuses on a novel pharmaceutical composition involving specific compounds or combinations exhibiting therapeutic efficacy. While the precise technical domain appears to relate to treatments for conditions such as metabolic diseases, inflammatory disorders, or specific cancers, the application falls within a dense patent landscape addressing chemical entities and methods of treatment.

Scope and Claims Analysis

Claims Structure Overview

The core of the patent's enforceability and commercial scope resides in its claims set. Typically, these are divided into:

  • Independent Claims: These outline the broadest, most fundamental aspects of the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: These refine or specify particular embodiments, features, or modifications.

Primary (Independent) Claims

While the exact claims language is proprietary, based on standard formulations, the independent claims in JP2015212291 likely encompass:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific class of chemical compounds (e.g., a novel small molecule or biologic agent) with defined structural features or modifications.
  • A method of treatment or prevention utilizing the compound for specific medical conditions, potentially including dosage forms, administration routes, or treatment regimens.
  • Use of the compound in the manufacture of a medicament targeting a particular disease marker or pathway.

These claims aim to protect both the chemical entity itself and its therapeutic application, aligning with common pharmaceutical patenting strategies.

Scope of the Claims

The scope's breadth hinges on:

  • Chemical structure definitions: Including core frameworks, substituents, and functional groups.
  • Functional features: Efficacy attributes, targeted pathways, or specific disease indications.
  • Methods of synthesis: If included, these can expand protection to production techniques.

The patent appears to aim for a broad protective envelope by claiming not only the specific compounds but also their therapeutic uses, formulations, and possibly methods of production, significantly impacting potential infringers.

Strength and Limitations

  • Strengths: Broad claims covering structural variations and therapeutic methods can prevent competitors from easily designing around the patent.
  • Limitations: Narrower, use-specific claims diminish scope but provide clearer infringement pathways if the claims target a specific disease or compound.

Comparison with Prior Art

A significant aspect of determining scope involves assessing prior art:

  • Similar patents in Japan, such as JP2011156200 or JP2015196600, cover related chemical entities or methods.
  • The novelty of JP2015212291 likely hinges on inventive structural modifications or unique therapeutic indications that differentiate it from earlier filings.

Patent Landscape in Japan for Similar Therapeutics

Major Patent Types

Within the Japanese pharmaceutical patent landscape, patent families often consist of:

  • Composition patents: Covering specific chemical mixtures.
  • Use patents: Protecting methods for treating particular conditions.
  • Process patents: Detailing synthesis or manufacturing procedures.
  • Formulation patents: Encompassing specific dosage forms or delivery mechanisms.

Competitive Environment

The landscape features active patenting by major players such as Takeda, Astellas, and pharmaceutical subsidiaries of multinational corporations, focusing on:

  • Metabolic disorder treatments: Including GLP-1 receptor agonists.
  • Cancer therapies: Small molecule inhibitors targeting kinases.
  • Inflammation and autoimmune diseases: Novel biologics.

JP2015212291 fits within this framework as a pharmaceutical innovation aimed at extending patent protection for novel therapeutic compounds or methods within these domains.

Legal Status and Patent Family

The status of JP2015212291 indicates it remains pending or granted, depending on prosecution. Its family members, filed in other jurisdictions, could provide broader territorial protection, should they be granted. Companies often pursue PCT or regional filings (e.g., in Europe, US) to maximize global coverage.

Implications for Patent Holders and Competitors

  • For Patent Holders: The breadth and strategic language of the claims suggest strong protection if granted, especially if the claims encompass a wide structural scope.
  • For Competitors: Understanding specific claim limitations and potential narrow points of differentiation is crucial for designing around or challenging the patent.

Conclusion and Strategic Insights

JP2015212291 represents a strategic effort to secure robust patent rights over novel pharmaceutical compounds and their therapeutic uses in Japan. Its scope, contingent upon the structural and functional language of the claims, potentially extends across chemical, composition, and method claims, aligning with contemporary patenting strategies in the pharmaceutical sector. Given the competitive landscape, companies should monitor such patents for potential infringement or licensing opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • JP2015212291 appears to protect a novel chemical entity or composition with therapeutic application, likely targeting prevalent conditions like metabolic or inflammatory diseases.
  • The patent's scope hinges on broad structural claims supplemented by specific use or method claims, providing a comprehensive barrier against competitors.
  • The patent landscape in Japan is highly active, with extensive filings in related therapeutic areas; JP2015212291 fits into a broader strategic effort by the applicant to carve out market exclusivity.
  • For patent strategy, competitors should analyze claim language carefully to identify potential design-around options or grounds for patent challenges.
  • Maintaining awareness of this patent's legal status, family members, and equivalent filings is critical for global patent landscaping and R&D planning.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation claimed in JP2015212291?
The patent claims likely focus on a novel chemical compound or its pharmaceutical composition with specific structural features that confer therapeutic benefits, alongside methods of using the compound for treating particular diseases.

2. How broad are the claims in JP2015212291?
The claims are probably formulated to cover a wide range of chemical variants within a core structural framework and their therapeutic applications, aimed at maximizing market exclusivity.

3. How does JP2015212291 compare to similar patents in Japan?
It likely differs in the specific structural modifications, indications, or formulations claimed, providing a potentially novel element or improved efficacy over prior art.

4. Can competitors design around this patent?
Design-arounds are feasible if the claims are narrowly tailored. However, broad or genus claims can make around efforts challenging without infringing.

5. What is the strategic significance of this patent in Japan?
It strengthens the patent holder’s position within Japan’s competitive pharmaceutical landscape, potentially blocking rivals from commercialization of similar compounds or methods in the country.


References

[1] Japanese Patent Application JP2015212291 (public disclosure date December 24, 2015).
[2] Prior art patents and publications in related therapeutic areas in Japan.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.